Cargando…

A meta-analysis on the effect of implant characteristics on the survival of the wide-diameter implant

The purposes of the study are to study the implant survival of the wide-diameter implant and to analyze if the length, the implant surface, or the placement location has any effect on its survival. Electronic databases were searched from inception to Dec 2014. Studies included in the review had impl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ting, Miriam, Palermo, Matthew, Donatelli, David P., Gaughan, John P., Suzuki, Jon B., Jefferies, Steven R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5005654/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27747650
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-015-0030-2
_version_ 1782450954131472384
author Ting, Miriam
Palermo, Matthew
Donatelli, David P.
Gaughan, John P.
Suzuki, Jon B.
Jefferies, Steven R.
author_facet Ting, Miriam
Palermo, Matthew
Donatelli, David P.
Gaughan, John P.
Suzuki, Jon B.
Jefferies, Steven R.
author_sort Ting, Miriam
collection PubMed
description The purposes of the study are to study the implant survival of the wide-diameter implant and to analyze if the length, the implant surface, or the placement location has any effect on its survival. Electronic databases were searched from inception to Dec 2014. Studies included in the review had implants placed in areas of adequate bone width and had clear inclusion and exclusion criteria for patient selection. Immediately placed and immediately loaded implants were excluded. A meta-analysis was done using the “random effects” model on the included studies. And, a meta-regression was used to evaluate the effects of location, length, and surface on the implant survival. Of the six studies selected, three evaluated surface-treated implants and three machined implants. The overall pooled survival rate of the wide implant is 96.3 %. The meta-regression showed that when using a wide implant, neither its surface nor its length nor its position in the maxilla or mandible adversely affected its survival (P > 0.05). This meta-analysis concluded that the location, length, and surface of the wide-diameter implant did not affect its survival and therefore suggested that when the conditions of the implant site corresponded to the inclusion criteria of our meta-analysis, choosing a wide-diameter implant in the posterior mandible or maxilla, where implant length may be limited by the nerve or the sinus, the use of a short implant regardless of its surface would not affect its survival.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5005654
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50056542016-08-31 A meta-analysis on the effect of implant characteristics on the survival of the wide-diameter implant Ting, Miriam Palermo, Matthew Donatelli, David P. Gaughan, John P. Suzuki, Jon B. Jefferies, Steven R. Int J Implant Dent Review The purposes of the study are to study the implant survival of the wide-diameter implant and to analyze if the length, the implant surface, or the placement location has any effect on its survival. Electronic databases were searched from inception to Dec 2014. Studies included in the review had implants placed in areas of adequate bone width and had clear inclusion and exclusion criteria for patient selection. Immediately placed and immediately loaded implants were excluded. A meta-analysis was done using the “random effects” model on the included studies. And, a meta-regression was used to evaluate the effects of location, length, and surface on the implant survival. Of the six studies selected, three evaluated surface-treated implants and three machined implants. The overall pooled survival rate of the wide implant is 96.3 %. The meta-regression showed that when using a wide implant, neither its surface nor its length nor its position in the maxilla or mandible adversely affected its survival (P > 0.05). This meta-analysis concluded that the location, length, and surface of the wide-diameter implant did not affect its survival and therefore suggested that when the conditions of the implant site corresponded to the inclusion criteria of our meta-analysis, choosing a wide-diameter implant in the posterior mandible or maxilla, where implant length may be limited by the nerve or the sinus, the use of a short implant regardless of its surface would not affect its survival. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5005654/ /pubmed/27747650 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-015-0030-2 Text en © Ting et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Review
Ting, Miriam
Palermo, Matthew
Donatelli, David P.
Gaughan, John P.
Suzuki, Jon B.
Jefferies, Steven R.
A meta-analysis on the effect of implant characteristics on the survival of the wide-diameter implant
title A meta-analysis on the effect of implant characteristics on the survival of the wide-diameter implant
title_full A meta-analysis on the effect of implant characteristics on the survival of the wide-diameter implant
title_fullStr A meta-analysis on the effect of implant characteristics on the survival of the wide-diameter implant
title_full_unstemmed A meta-analysis on the effect of implant characteristics on the survival of the wide-diameter implant
title_short A meta-analysis on the effect of implant characteristics on the survival of the wide-diameter implant
title_sort meta-analysis on the effect of implant characteristics on the survival of the wide-diameter implant
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5005654/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27747650
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-015-0030-2
work_keys_str_mv AT tingmiriam ametaanalysisontheeffectofimplantcharacteristicsonthesurvivalofthewidediameterimplant
AT palermomatthew ametaanalysisontheeffectofimplantcharacteristicsonthesurvivalofthewidediameterimplant
AT donatellidavidp ametaanalysisontheeffectofimplantcharacteristicsonthesurvivalofthewidediameterimplant
AT gaughanjohnp ametaanalysisontheeffectofimplantcharacteristicsonthesurvivalofthewidediameterimplant
AT suzukijonb ametaanalysisontheeffectofimplantcharacteristicsonthesurvivalofthewidediameterimplant
AT jefferiesstevenr ametaanalysisontheeffectofimplantcharacteristicsonthesurvivalofthewidediameterimplant
AT tingmiriam metaanalysisontheeffectofimplantcharacteristicsonthesurvivalofthewidediameterimplant
AT palermomatthew metaanalysisontheeffectofimplantcharacteristicsonthesurvivalofthewidediameterimplant
AT donatellidavidp metaanalysisontheeffectofimplantcharacteristicsonthesurvivalofthewidediameterimplant
AT gaughanjohnp metaanalysisontheeffectofimplantcharacteristicsonthesurvivalofthewidediameterimplant
AT suzukijonb metaanalysisontheeffectofimplantcharacteristicsonthesurvivalofthewidediameterimplant
AT jefferiesstevenr metaanalysisontheeffectofimplantcharacteristicsonthesurvivalofthewidediameterimplant