Cargando…
A meta-analysis on the effect of implant characteristics on the survival of the wide-diameter implant
The purposes of the study are to study the implant survival of the wide-diameter implant and to analyze if the length, the implant surface, or the placement location has any effect on its survival. Electronic databases were searched from inception to Dec 2014. Studies included in the review had impl...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5005654/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27747650 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-015-0030-2 |
_version_ | 1782450954131472384 |
---|---|
author | Ting, Miriam Palermo, Matthew Donatelli, David P. Gaughan, John P. Suzuki, Jon B. Jefferies, Steven R. |
author_facet | Ting, Miriam Palermo, Matthew Donatelli, David P. Gaughan, John P. Suzuki, Jon B. Jefferies, Steven R. |
author_sort | Ting, Miriam |
collection | PubMed |
description | The purposes of the study are to study the implant survival of the wide-diameter implant and to analyze if the length, the implant surface, or the placement location has any effect on its survival. Electronic databases were searched from inception to Dec 2014. Studies included in the review had implants placed in areas of adequate bone width and had clear inclusion and exclusion criteria for patient selection. Immediately placed and immediately loaded implants were excluded. A meta-analysis was done using the “random effects” model on the included studies. And, a meta-regression was used to evaluate the effects of location, length, and surface on the implant survival. Of the six studies selected, three evaluated surface-treated implants and three machined implants. The overall pooled survival rate of the wide implant is 96.3 %. The meta-regression showed that when using a wide implant, neither its surface nor its length nor its position in the maxilla or mandible adversely affected its survival (P > 0.05). This meta-analysis concluded that the location, length, and surface of the wide-diameter implant did not affect its survival and therefore suggested that when the conditions of the implant site corresponded to the inclusion criteria of our meta-analysis, choosing a wide-diameter implant in the posterior mandible or maxilla, where implant length may be limited by the nerve or the sinus, the use of a short implant regardless of its surface would not affect its survival. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5005654 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50056542016-08-31 A meta-analysis on the effect of implant characteristics on the survival of the wide-diameter implant Ting, Miriam Palermo, Matthew Donatelli, David P. Gaughan, John P. Suzuki, Jon B. Jefferies, Steven R. Int J Implant Dent Review The purposes of the study are to study the implant survival of the wide-diameter implant and to analyze if the length, the implant surface, or the placement location has any effect on its survival. Electronic databases were searched from inception to Dec 2014. Studies included in the review had implants placed in areas of adequate bone width and had clear inclusion and exclusion criteria for patient selection. Immediately placed and immediately loaded implants were excluded. A meta-analysis was done using the “random effects” model on the included studies. And, a meta-regression was used to evaluate the effects of location, length, and surface on the implant survival. Of the six studies selected, three evaluated surface-treated implants and three machined implants. The overall pooled survival rate of the wide implant is 96.3 %. The meta-regression showed that when using a wide implant, neither its surface nor its length nor its position in the maxilla or mandible adversely affected its survival (P > 0.05). This meta-analysis concluded that the location, length, and surface of the wide-diameter implant did not affect its survival and therefore suggested that when the conditions of the implant site corresponded to the inclusion criteria of our meta-analysis, choosing a wide-diameter implant in the posterior mandible or maxilla, where implant length may be limited by the nerve or the sinus, the use of a short implant regardless of its surface would not affect its survival. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5005654/ /pubmed/27747650 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-015-0030-2 Text en © Ting et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Review Ting, Miriam Palermo, Matthew Donatelli, David P. Gaughan, John P. Suzuki, Jon B. Jefferies, Steven R. A meta-analysis on the effect of implant characteristics on the survival of the wide-diameter implant |
title | A meta-analysis on the effect of implant characteristics on the survival of the wide-diameter implant |
title_full | A meta-analysis on the effect of implant characteristics on the survival of the wide-diameter implant |
title_fullStr | A meta-analysis on the effect of implant characteristics on the survival of the wide-diameter implant |
title_full_unstemmed | A meta-analysis on the effect of implant characteristics on the survival of the wide-diameter implant |
title_short | A meta-analysis on the effect of implant characteristics on the survival of the wide-diameter implant |
title_sort | meta-analysis on the effect of implant characteristics on the survival of the wide-diameter implant |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5005654/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27747650 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-015-0030-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tingmiriam ametaanalysisontheeffectofimplantcharacteristicsonthesurvivalofthewidediameterimplant AT palermomatthew ametaanalysisontheeffectofimplantcharacteristicsonthesurvivalofthewidediameterimplant AT donatellidavidp ametaanalysisontheeffectofimplantcharacteristicsonthesurvivalofthewidediameterimplant AT gaughanjohnp ametaanalysisontheeffectofimplantcharacteristicsonthesurvivalofthewidediameterimplant AT suzukijonb ametaanalysisontheeffectofimplantcharacteristicsonthesurvivalofthewidediameterimplant AT jefferiesstevenr ametaanalysisontheeffectofimplantcharacteristicsonthesurvivalofthewidediameterimplant AT tingmiriam metaanalysisontheeffectofimplantcharacteristicsonthesurvivalofthewidediameterimplant AT palermomatthew metaanalysisontheeffectofimplantcharacteristicsonthesurvivalofthewidediameterimplant AT donatellidavidp metaanalysisontheeffectofimplantcharacteristicsonthesurvivalofthewidediameterimplant AT gaughanjohnp metaanalysisontheeffectofimplantcharacteristicsonthesurvivalofthewidediameterimplant AT suzukijonb metaanalysisontheeffectofimplantcharacteristicsonthesurvivalofthewidediameterimplant AT jefferiesstevenr metaanalysisontheeffectofimplantcharacteristicsonthesurvivalofthewidediameterimplant |