Cargando…

Temperature rise during removal of fractured components out of the implant body: an in vitro study comparing two ultrasonic devices and five implant types

BACKGROUND: Ultrasonic instrumentation under magnification may facilitate mobilization of screw remnants but may induce heat trauma to surrounding bone. An increase of 5°C is considered detrimental to osseointegration. The objective of this investigation was to examine the rise in temperature of the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meisberger, Eric W, Bakker, Sjoerd J G, Cune, Marco S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5005689/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27747629
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-015-0008-0
_version_ 1782450958692777984
author Meisberger, Eric W
Bakker, Sjoerd J G
Cune, Marco S
author_facet Meisberger, Eric W
Bakker, Sjoerd J G
Cune, Marco S
author_sort Meisberger, Eric W
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ultrasonic instrumentation under magnification may facilitate mobilization of screw remnants but may induce heat trauma to surrounding bone. An increase of 5°C is considered detrimental to osseointegration. The objective of this investigation was to examine the rise in temperature of the outer implant body after 30 s of ultrasonic instrumentation to the inner part, in relation to implant type, type of ultrasonic equipment, and the use of coolants in vitro. METHODS: Two ultrasonic devices (Satelec Suprasson T Max and Electro Medical Systems (EMS) miniMaster) were used on five different implant types that were provided with a thermo couple (Astra 3.5 mm, bone level Regular CrossFit (RC) 4.1 mm, bone level Narrow CrossFit (NC) 3.3 mm, Straumann tissue level regular body regular neck 3.3 mm, and Straumann tissue level wide body regular neck 4.8 mm), either with or without cooling during 30 s. Temperature rise at this point in time is the primary outcome measure. In addition, the mean maximum rise in temperature (all implants combined) was assessed and statistically compared among devices, implant systems, and cooling mode (independent t-tests, ANOVA, and post hoc analysis). RESULTS: The Satelec device without cooling induces the highest temperature change of up to 13°C, particularly in both bone level implants (p < 0.05) but appears safe for approximately 10 s of continuous instrumentation, after which a cooling down period is rational. Cooling is effective for both devices. However, when the Satelec device is used with coolant for a longer period of time, a rise in temperature must be anticipated after cessation of instrumentation, and post-operational cooling is advised. CONCLUSIONS: The in vitro setup used in this experiment implies that care should be taken when translating the observations to clinical recommendations, but it is carefully suggested that the EMS device causes limited rise in temperature, even without coolant.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5005689
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50056892016-08-31 Temperature rise during removal of fractured components out of the implant body: an in vitro study comparing two ultrasonic devices and five implant types Meisberger, Eric W Bakker, Sjoerd J G Cune, Marco S Int J Implant Dent Research Article BACKGROUND: Ultrasonic instrumentation under magnification may facilitate mobilization of screw remnants but may induce heat trauma to surrounding bone. An increase of 5°C is considered detrimental to osseointegration. The objective of this investigation was to examine the rise in temperature of the outer implant body after 30 s of ultrasonic instrumentation to the inner part, in relation to implant type, type of ultrasonic equipment, and the use of coolants in vitro. METHODS: Two ultrasonic devices (Satelec Suprasson T Max and Electro Medical Systems (EMS) miniMaster) were used on five different implant types that were provided with a thermo couple (Astra 3.5 mm, bone level Regular CrossFit (RC) 4.1 mm, bone level Narrow CrossFit (NC) 3.3 mm, Straumann tissue level regular body regular neck 3.3 mm, and Straumann tissue level wide body regular neck 4.8 mm), either with or without cooling during 30 s. Temperature rise at this point in time is the primary outcome measure. In addition, the mean maximum rise in temperature (all implants combined) was assessed and statistically compared among devices, implant systems, and cooling mode (independent t-tests, ANOVA, and post hoc analysis). RESULTS: The Satelec device without cooling induces the highest temperature change of up to 13°C, particularly in both bone level implants (p < 0.05) but appears safe for approximately 10 s of continuous instrumentation, after which a cooling down period is rational. Cooling is effective for both devices. However, when the Satelec device is used with coolant for a longer period of time, a rise in temperature must be anticipated after cessation of instrumentation, and post-operational cooling is advised. CONCLUSIONS: The in vitro setup used in this experiment implies that care should be taken when translating the observations to clinical recommendations, but it is carefully suggested that the EMS device causes limited rise in temperature, even without coolant. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5005689/ /pubmed/27747629 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-015-0008-0 Text en © Meisberger et al; licensee Springer. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Meisberger, Eric W
Bakker, Sjoerd J G
Cune, Marco S
Temperature rise during removal of fractured components out of the implant body: an in vitro study comparing two ultrasonic devices and five implant types
title Temperature rise during removal of fractured components out of the implant body: an in vitro study comparing two ultrasonic devices and five implant types
title_full Temperature rise during removal of fractured components out of the implant body: an in vitro study comparing two ultrasonic devices and five implant types
title_fullStr Temperature rise during removal of fractured components out of the implant body: an in vitro study comparing two ultrasonic devices and five implant types
title_full_unstemmed Temperature rise during removal of fractured components out of the implant body: an in vitro study comparing two ultrasonic devices and five implant types
title_short Temperature rise during removal of fractured components out of the implant body: an in vitro study comparing two ultrasonic devices and five implant types
title_sort temperature rise during removal of fractured components out of the implant body: an in vitro study comparing two ultrasonic devices and five implant types
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5005689/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27747629
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-015-0008-0
work_keys_str_mv AT meisbergerericw temperatureriseduringremovaloffracturedcomponentsoutoftheimplantbodyaninvitrostudycomparingtwoultrasonicdevicesandfiveimplanttypes
AT bakkersjoerdjg temperatureriseduringremovaloffracturedcomponentsoutoftheimplantbodyaninvitrostudycomparingtwoultrasonicdevicesandfiveimplanttypes
AT cunemarcos temperatureriseduringremovaloffracturedcomponentsoutoftheimplantbodyaninvitrostudycomparingtwoultrasonicdevicesandfiveimplanttypes