Cargando…

Evaluation of the maxillary sinus in panoramic radiography—a comparative study

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity and the inter- and intra-examiner reliability of panoramic-radiograph-driven findings of different maxillary sinus anatomic variations and pathologies, which had initially been prediagnosed by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). METHOD...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Malina-Altzinger, Johann, Damerau, Georg, Grätz, Klaus W, Stadlinger, PD Bernd
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5005697/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27747639
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-015-0015-1
_version_ 1782450960328556544
author Malina-Altzinger, Johann
Damerau, Georg
Grätz, Klaus W
Stadlinger, PD Bernd
author_facet Malina-Altzinger, Johann
Damerau, Georg
Grätz, Klaus W
Stadlinger, PD Bernd
author_sort Malina-Altzinger, Johann
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity and the inter- and intra-examiner reliability of panoramic-radiograph-driven findings of different maxillary sinus anatomic variations and pathologies, which had initially been prediagnosed by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). METHODS: After pairs of two-dimensional (2D) panoramic and three-dimensional (3D) CBCT images of patients having received treatment at the outpatient department had been screened, the predefinition of 54 selected maxillary sinus conditions was initially performed on CBCT images by two blinded consultants individually using a questionnaire that defined ten different clinically relevant findings. Using the identic questionnaire, these consultants performed the evaluation of the panoramic radiographs at a later time point. The results were analyzed for inter-imaging differences in the evaluation of the maxillary sinus between 2D and 3D imaging methods. Additionally, two resident groups (first year and last year of training) performed two diagnostic runs of the panoramic radiographs and results were analyzed for inter- and intra-observer reliability. RESULTS: There is a moderate risk for false diagnosis of findings of the maxillary sinus if only panoramic radiography is used. Based on the ten predefined conditions, solely maxillary bone cysts penetrating into the sinus were frequently detected differently comparing 2D to 3D diagnostics. Additionally, on panoramic radiographs, the inter-observer comparison demonstrated that basal septa were significantly often rated differently and the intra-observer comparison showed a significant lack in reliability in detecting maxillary bone cysts penetrating into the sinus. CONCLUSIONS: Panoramic radiography provides the most information on the maxillary sinus, and it may be an adequate imaging method. However, particular findings of the maxillary sinus in panoramic imaging may be based on a rather examiner-dependent assessment. Therefore, a persistent and precise evaluation of specific conditions of the maxillary sinus may only be possible using CBCT because it provides additional information compared to panoramic radiography. This might be relevant for consecutive surgical procedures; consequently, we recommend CBCT if a precise preoperative evaluation is mandatory. However, higher radiation dose and costs of 3D imaging need to be considered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5005697
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50056972016-08-31 Evaluation of the maxillary sinus in panoramic radiography—a comparative study Malina-Altzinger, Johann Damerau, Georg Grätz, Klaus W Stadlinger, PD Bernd Int J Implant Dent Research BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity and the inter- and intra-examiner reliability of panoramic-radiograph-driven findings of different maxillary sinus anatomic variations and pathologies, which had initially been prediagnosed by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). METHODS: After pairs of two-dimensional (2D) panoramic and three-dimensional (3D) CBCT images of patients having received treatment at the outpatient department had been screened, the predefinition of 54 selected maxillary sinus conditions was initially performed on CBCT images by two blinded consultants individually using a questionnaire that defined ten different clinically relevant findings. Using the identic questionnaire, these consultants performed the evaluation of the panoramic radiographs at a later time point. The results were analyzed for inter-imaging differences in the evaluation of the maxillary sinus between 2D and 3D imaging methods. Additionally, two resident groups (first year and last year of training) performed two diagnostic runs of the panoramic radiographs and results were analyzed for inter- and intra-observer reliability. RESULTS: There is a moderate risk for false diagnosis of findings of the maxillary sinus if only panoramic radiography is used. Based on the ten predefined conditions, solely maxillary bone cysts penetrating into the sinus were frequently detected differently comparing 2D to 3D diagnostics. Additionally, on panoramic radiographs, the inter-observer comparison demonstrated that basal septa were significantly often rated differently and the intra-observer comparison showed a significant lack in reliability in detecting maxillary bone cysts penetrating into the sinus. CONCLUSIONS: Panoramic radiography provides the most information on the maxillary sinus, and it may be an adequate imaging method. However, particular findings of the maxillary sinus in panoramic imaging may be based on a rather examiner-dependent assessment. Therefore, a persistent and precise evaluation of specific conditions of the maxillary sinus may only be possible using CBCT because it provides additional information compared to panoramic radiography. This might be relevant for consecutive surgical procedures; consequently, we recommend CBCT if a precise preoperative evaluation is mandatory. However, higher radiation dose and costs of 3D imaging need to be considered. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5005697/ /pubmed/27747639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-015-0015-1 Text en © Malina-Altzinger et al. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
spellingShingle Research
Malina-Altzinger, Johann
Damerau, Georg
Grätz, Klaus W
Stadlinger, PD Bernd
Evaluation of the maxillary sinus in panoramic radiography—a comparative study
title Evaluation of the maxillary sinus in panoramic radiography—a comparative study
title_full Evaluation of the maxillary sinus in panoramic radiography—a comparative study
title_fullStr Evaluation of the maxillary sinus in panoramic radiography—a comparative study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the maxillary sinus in panoramic radiography—a comparative study
title_short Evaluation of the maxillary sinus in panoramic radiography—a comparative study
title_sort evaluation of the maxillary sinus in panoramic radiography—a comparative study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5005697/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27747639
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-015-0015-1
work_keys_str_mv AT malinaaltzingerjohann evaluationofthemaxillarysinusinpanoramicradiographyacomparativestudy
AT dameraugeorg evaluationofthemaxillarysinusinpanoramicradiographyacomparativestudy
AT gratzklausw evaluationofthemaxillarysinusinpanoramicradiographyacomparativestudy
AT stadlingerpdbernd evaluationofthemaxillarysinusinpanoramicradiographyacomparativestudy