Cargando…

Case presentation of two patients using diagonal platform-switched double implants for maxillary single-first-molar replacement as the alternative of a single-tooth implant

A single-tooth implant restoration is generally performed for maxillary single-first-molar replacement. If the interdental space between the second premolar and the second molar is large enough, a double-implant placement can be performed to avoid creating mesiodistal cantilever and to distribute oc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hotta, Yasunori, Ito, Koji, Komatsu, Shinichi, Saito, Takashi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5005747/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27747651
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-015-0031-1
_version_ 1782450965102723072
author Hotta, Yasunori
Ito, Koji
Komatsu, Shinichi
Saito, Takashi
author_facet Hotta, Yasunori
Ito, Koji
Komatsu, Shinichi
Saito, Takashi
author_sort Hotta, Yasunori
collection PubMed
description A single-tooth implant restoration is generally performed for maxillary single-first-molar replacement. If the interdental space between the second premolar and the second molar is large enough, a double-implant placement can be performed to avoid creating mesiodistal cantilever and to distribute occlusal loading forces. If there is not adequate space for a double-implant placement to be performed mesiodistally along the crest of the alveolar ridge line, they should be placed along a diagonal line offset lingually to increase the space. This procedure has two primary advantages. First, greater stability is provided by a double-implant placement. Resistance to lateral forces (palatal-buccal) is much stronger than two implants placed along the alveolar crest ridge line. Residual palatal and buccal bone can provide support against occlusal forces, provided that there is adequate residual bone in these regions. If anatomical conditions are favorable, the placement of two diagonal implants in the palatal and buccal residual bones can be a rational procedure. We report on two typical patients. The progress of these patients was followed using computed tomography for 7 and 6 years, respectively.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5005747
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50057472016-08-31 Case presentation of two patients using diagonal platform-switched double implants for maxillary single-first-molar replacement as the alternative of a single-tooth implant Hotta, Yasunori Ito, Koji Komatsu, Shinichi Saito, Takashi Int J Implant Dent Case Report A single-tooth implant restoration is generally performed for maxillary single-first-molar replacement. If the interdental space between the second premolar and the second molar is large enough, a double-implant placement can be performed to avoid creating mesiodistal cantilever and to distribute occlusal loading forces. If there is not adequate space for a double-implant placement to be performed mesiodistally along the crest of the alveolar ridge line, they should be placed along a diagonal line offset lingually to increase the space. This procedure has two primary advantages. First, greater stability is provided by a double-implant placement. Resistance to lateral forces (palatal-buccal) is much stronger than two implants placed along the alveolar crest ridge line. Residual palatal and buccal bone can provide support against occlusal forces, provided that there is adequate residual bone in these regions. If anatomical conditions are favorable, the placement of two diagonal implants in the palatal and buccal residual bones can be a rational procedure. We report on two typical patients. The progress of these patients was followed using computed tomography for 7 and 6 years, respectively. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5005747/ /pubmed/27747651 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-015-0031-1 Text en © Hotta et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Case Report
Hotta, Yasunori
Ito, Koji
Komatsu, Shinichi
Saito, Takashi
Case presentation of two patients using diagonal platform-switched double implants for maxillary single-first-molar replacement as the alternative of a single-tooth implant
title Case presentation of two patients using diagonal platform-switched double implants for maxillary single-first-molar replacement as the alternative of a single-tooth implant
title_full Case presentation of two patients using diagonal platform-switched double implants for maxillary single-first-molar replacement as the alternative of a single-tooth implant
title_fullStr Case presentation of two patients using diagonal platform-switched double implants for maxillary single-first-molar replacement as the alternative of a single-tooth implant
title_full_unstemmed Case presentation of two patients using diagonal platform-switched double implants for maxillary single-first-molar replacement as the alternative of a single-tooth implant
title_short Case presentation of two patients using diagonal platform-switched double implants for maxillary single-first-molar replacement as the alternative of a single-tooth implant
title_sort case presentation of two patients using diagonal platform-switched double implants for maxillary single-first-molar replacement as the alternative of a single-tooth implant
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5005747/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27747651
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-015-0031-1
work_keys_str_mv AT hottayasunori casepresentationoftwopatientsusingdiagonalplatformswitcheddoubleimplantsformaxillarysinglefirstmolarreplacementasthealternativeofasingletoothimplant
AT itokoji casepresentationoftwopatientsusingdiagonalplatformswitcheddoubleimplantsformaxillarysinglefirstmolarreplacementasthealternativeofasingletoothimplant
AT komatsushinichi casepresentationoftwopatientsusingdiagonalplatformswitcheddoubleimplantsformaxillarysinglefirstmolarreplacementasthealternativeofasingletoothimplant
AT saitotakashi casepresentationoftwopatientsusingdiagonalplatformswitcheddoubleimplantsformaxillarysinglefirstmolarreplacementasthealternativeofasingletoothimplant