Cargando…

High-Dose Verapamil in Episodic and Chronic Cluster Headaches and Cardiac Adverse Events: Is It as Safe as We Think?

Cluster headache (CH) is a primary headache disorder with relatively effective treatments. Although few sufficiently controlled trials are available, verapamil is recommended as the first-line prophylactic drug for CH by the French Headache Society (with a low level of evidence, level B) and by the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alexandre, Joachim, Humbert, Xavier, Sassier, Marion, Milliez, Paul, Coquerel, Antoine, Fedrizzi, Sophie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5005783/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27747725
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40800-015-0015-3
_version_ 1782450971755937792
author Alexandre, Joachim
Humbert, Xavier
Sassier, Marion
Milliez, Paul
Coquerel, Antoine
Fedrizzi, Sophie
author_facet Alexandre, Joachim
Humbert, Xavier
Sassier, Marion
Milliez, Paul
Coquerel, Antoine
Fedrizzi, Sophie
author_sort Alexandre, Joachim
collection PubMed
description Cluster headache (CH) is a primary headache disorder with relatively effective treatments. Although few sufficiently controlled trials are available, verapamil is recommended as the first-line prophylactic drug for CH by the French Headache Society (with a low level of evidence, level B) and by the EFNS (European Federation of Neurological Societies, level A). Daily doses of more than 480 mg (and up to 1200 mg daily) are frequently used off-label, while 360 mg daily is the only dosage to have demonstrated its effectiveness in a double-blind trial against placebo, and the usual label posology used by cardiologists is 240 mg daily in hypertension. We report the case of a 19-year-old man who was self-reported to our cardiology consultation for dyspnea and asthenia for 18 months. His medical history consisted of CH crisis for 4 years treated by verapamil 720 mg/day for 18 months with relatively good efficiency. His electrocardiogram (ECG) showed a sinus bradycardia at 40 bpm with a first-degree atrio-ventricular block. Evolution was favorable after progressive verapamil discontinuation. Analysis performed on the French Pharmacovigilance Database between July 1, 2000 and December 1, 2014 found four other cases of cardiac adverse events related to high-dose verapamil used in CH prevention (two cases of syncope with complete atrio-ventricular block with verapamil 1200 and 240 mg daily, respectively, one syncope related to sick sinus syndrome with verapamil 360 mg daily, and one case of sinus bradycardia with verapamil 720 mg daily). Although available studies seem to demonstrate an apparent good tolerance, this off-label practice should not be considered as standard of care and requires strict cardiac monitoring, as suggested by the Agence Nationale de Sécurité du Médicament (ANSM) in a recent re-evaluation of the benefit/risk ratio of high-dose verapamil used in CH prevention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5005783
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50057832016-08-31 High-Dose Verapamil in Episodic and Chronic Cluster Headaches and Cardiac Adverse Events: Is It as Safe as We Think? Alexandre, Joachim Humbert, Xavier Sassier, Marion Milliez, Paul Coquerel, Antoine Fedrizzi, Sophie Drug Saf Case Rep Case Report Cluster headache (CH) is a primary headache disorder with relatively effective treatments. Although few sufficiently controlled trials are available, verapamil is recommended as the first-line prophylactic drug for CH by the French Headache Society (with a low level of evidence, level B) and by the EFNS (European Federation of Neurological Societies, level A). Daily doses of more than 480 mg (and up to 1200 mg daily) are frequently used off-label, while 360 mg daily is the only dosage to have demonstrated its effectiveness in a double-blind trial against placebo, and the usual label posology used by cardiologists is 240 mg daily in hypertension. We report the case of a 19-year-old man who was self-reported to our cardiology consultation for dyspnea and asthenia for 18 months. His medical history consisted of CH crisis for 4 years treated by verapamil 720 mg/day for 18 months with relatively good efficiency. His electrocardiogram (ECG) showed a sinus bradycardia at 40 bpm with a first-degree atrio-ventricular block. Evolution was favorable after progressive verapamil discontinuation. Analysis performed on the French Pharmacovigilance Database between July 1, 2000 and December 1, 2014 found four other cases of cardiac adverse events related to high-dose verapamil used in CH prevention (two cases of syncope with complete atrio-ventricular block with verapamil 1200 and 240 mg daily, respectively, one syncope related to sick sinus syndrome with verapamil 360 mg daily, and one case of sinus bradycardia with verapamil 720 mg daily). Although available studies seem to demonstrate an apparent good tolerance, this off-label practice should not be considered as standard of care and requires strict cardiac monitoring, as suggested by the Agence Nationale de Sécurité du Médicament (ANSM) in a recent re-evaluation of the benefit/risk ratio of high-dose verapamil used in CH prevention. Springer International Publishing 2015-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5005783/ /pubmed/27747725 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40800-015-0015-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Case Report
Alexandre, Joachim
Humbert, Xavier
Sassier, Marion
Milliez, Paul
Coquerel, Antoine
Fedrizzi, Sophie
High-Dose Verapamil in Episodic and Chronic Cluster Headaches and Cardiac Adverse Events: Is It as Safe as We Think?
title High-Dose Verapamil in Episodic and Chronic Cluster Headaches and Cardiac Adverse Events: Is It as Safe as We Think?
title_full High-Dose Verapamil in Episodic and Chronic Cluster Headaches and Cardiac Adverse Events: Is It as Safe as We Think?
title_fullStr High-Dose Verapamil in Episodic and Chronic Cluster Headaches and Cardiac Adverse Events: Is It as Safe as We Think?
title_full_unstemmed High-Dose Verapamil in Episodic and Chronic Cluster Headaches and Cardiac Adverse Events: Is It as Safe as We Think?
title_short High-Dose Verapamil in Episodic and Chronic Cluster Headaches and Cardiac Adverse Events: Is It as Safe as We Think?
title_sort high-dose verapamil in episodic and chronic cluster headaches and cardiac adverse events: is it as safe as we think?
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5005783/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27747725
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40800-015-0015-3
work_keys_str_mv AT alexandrejoachim highdoseverapamilinepisodicandchronicclusterheadachesandcardiacadverseeventsisitassafeaswethink
AT humbertxavier highdoseverapamilinepisodicandchronicclusterheadachesandcardiacadverseeventsisitassafeaswethink
AT sassiermarion highdoseverapamilinepisodicandchronicclusterheadachesandcardiacadverseeventsisitassafeaswethink
AT milliezpaul highdoseverapamilinepisodicandchronicclusterheadachesandcardiacadverseeventsisitassafeaswethink
AT coquerelantoine highdoseverapamilinepisodicandchronicclusterheadachesandcardiacadverseeventsisitassafeaswethink
AT fedrizzisophie highdoseverapamilinepisodicandchronicclusterheadachesandcardiacadverseeventsisitassafeaswethink