Cargando…

Solid organ fabrication: comparison of decellularization to 3D bioprinting

Solid organ fabrication is an ultimate goal of Regenerative Medicine. Since the introduction of Tissue Engineering in 1993, functional biomaterials, stem cells, tunable microenvironments, and high-resolution imaging technologies have significantly advanced efforts to regenerate in vitro culture or t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jung, Jangwook P., Bhuiyan, Didarul B., Ogle, Brenda M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5006370/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27583168
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40824-016-0074-2
_version_ 1782451050731536384
author Jung, Jangwook P.
Bhuiyan, Didarul B.
Ogle, Brenda M.
author_facet Jung, Jangwook P.
Bhuiyan, Didarul B.
Ogle, Brenda M.
author_sort Jung, Jangwook P.
collection PubMed
description Solid organ fabrication is an ultimate goal of Regenerative Medicine. Since the introduction of Tissue Engineering in 1993, functional biomaterials, stem cells, tunable microenvironments, and high-resolution imaging technologies have significantly advanced efforts to regenerate in vitro culture or tissue platforms. Relatively simple flat or tubular organs are already in (pre)clinical trials and a few commercial products are in market. The road to more complex, high demand, solid organs including heart, kidney and lung will require substantive technical advancement. Here, we consider two emerging technologies for solid organ fabrication. One is decellularization of cadaveric organs followed by repopulation with terminally differentiated or progenitor cells. The other is 3D bioprinting to deposit cell-laden bio-inks to attain complex tissue architecture. We reviewed the development and evolution of the two technologies and evaluated relative strengths needed to produce solid organs, with special emphasis on the heart and other tissues of the cardiovascular system.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5006370
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50063702016-09-01 Solid organ fabrication: comparison of decellularization to 3D bioprinting Jung, Jangwook P. Bhuiyan, Didarul B. Ogle, Brenda M. Biomater Res Review Solid organ fabrication is an ultimate goal of Regenerative Medicine. Since the introduction of Tissue Engineering in 1993, functional biomaterials, stem cells, tunable microenvironments, and high-resolution imaging technologies have significantly advanced efforts to regenerate in vitro culture or tissue platforms. Relatively simple flat or tubular organs are already in (pre)clinical trials and a few commercial products are in market. The road to more complex, high demand, solid organs including heart, kidney and lung will require substantive technical advancement. Here, we consider two emerging technologies for solid organ fabrication. One is decellularization of cadaveric organs followed by repopulation with terminally differentiated or progenitor cells. The other is 3D bioprinting to deposit cell-laden bio-inks to attain complex tissue architecture. We reviewed the development and evolution of the two technologies and evaluated relative strengths needed to produce solid organs, with special emphasis on the heart and other tissues of the cardiovascular system. BioMed Central 2016-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5006370/ /pubmed/27583168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40824-016-0074-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Jung, Jangwook P.
Bhuiyan, Didarul B.
Ogle, Brenda M.
Solid organ fabrication: comparison of decellularization to 3D bioprinting
title Solid organ fabrication: comparison of decellularization to 3D bioprinting
title_full Solid organ fabrication: comparison of decellularization to 3D bioprinting
title_fullStr Solid organ fabrication: comparison of decellularization to 3D bioprinting
title_full_unstemmed Solid organ fabrication: comparison of decellularization to 3D bioprinting
title_short Solid organ fabrication: comparison of decellularization to 3D bioprinting
title_sort solid organ fabrication: comparison of decellularization to 3d bioprinting
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5006370/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27583168
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40824-016-0074-2
work_keys_str_mv AT jungjangwookp solidorganfabricationcomparisonofdecellularizationto3dbioprinting
AT bhuiyandidarulb solidorganfabricationcomparisonofdecellularizationto3dbioprinting
AT oglebrendam solidorganfabricationcomparisonofdecellularizationto3dbioprinting