Cargando…

Comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hybrid instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery

INTRODUCTION: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis is the most common type of scoliosis. A Cobb angle of 50° will progress beyond the age of spinal maturity. Surgery over bracing is advised at a Cobb angle above or equal to 50°. The aim of surgery is to bring the Cobb angle down below 50° to prevent repr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rafi, Sohail, Munshi, Naseem, Abbas, Asad, Shaikh, Rabia Hassan, Hashmi, Imtiaz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5006467/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27695235
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-3147.185510
_version_ 1782451067653455872
author Rafi, Sohail
Munshi, Naseem
Abbas, Asad
Shaikh, Rabia Hassan
Hashmi, Imtiaz
author_facet Rafi, Sohail
Munshi, Naseem
Abbas, Asad
Shaikh, Rabia Hassan
Hashmi, Imtiaz
author_sort Rafi, Sohail
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis is the most common type of scoliosis. A Cobb angle of 50° will progress beyond the age of spinal maturity. Surgery over bracing is advised at a Cobb angle above or equal to 50°. The aim of surgery is to bring the Cobb angle down below 50° to prevent reprogression as well as improve the quality of life. The objective of the study is to analyze the efficacy and significance in lifestyle improvement of pedicle screw-only fixation system versus the more common hybrid instrumentation system used for the surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted involving two groups of patients were included in the study. One group was operated with pedicle screw-only method while the other with hybrid instrumentation system. The pre- and post-operative Cobb's angles were taken across a follow-up of 4 years. An SRS-30 questionnaire was given in a yearly follow-up to assess the lifestyle improvement of the patient. RESULTS: Pedicle screw-only method was significantly more effective in reducing Cobb's angle (P = 0.0487). It was showed less loss of correction (P = 0.009) pedicle screw-only surgery was also better at reducing thoracic curves (P = 0.001). There seemed a better recovery time with pedicle screw surgery (P = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Pedicle screws are more effective and durable than hybrid systems at when treating adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5006467
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50064672016-10-01 Comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hybrid instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery Rafi, Sohail Munshi, Naseem Abbas, Asad Shaikh, Rabia Hassan Hashmi, Imtiaz J Neurosci Rural Pract Original Article INTRODUCTION: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis is the most common type of scoliosis. A Cobb angle of 50° will progress beyond the age of spinal maturity. Surgery over bracing is advised at a Cobb angle above or equal to 50°. The aim of surgery is to bring the Cobb angle down below 50° to prevent reprogression as well as improve the quality of life. The objective of the study is to analyze the efficacy and significance in lifestyle improvement of pedicle screw-only fixation system versus the more common hybrid instrumentation system used for the surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted involving two groups of patients were included in the study. One group was operated with pedicle screw-only method while the other with hybrid instrumentation system. The pre- and post-operative Cobb's angles were taken across a follow-up of 4 years. An SRS-30 questionnaire was given in a yearly follow-up to assess the lifestyle improvement of the patient. RESULTS: Pedicle screw-only method was significantly more effective in reducing Cobb's angle (P = 0.0487). It was showed less loss of correction (P = 0.009) pedicle screw-only surgery was also better at reducing thoracic curves (P = 0.001). There seemed a better recovery time with pedicle screw surgery (P = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Pedicle screws are more effective and durable than hybrid systems at when treating adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5006467/ /pubmed/27695235 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-3147.185510 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Neurosciences in Rural Practice http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Rafi, Sohail
Munshi, Naseem
Abbas, Asad
Shaikh, Rabia Hassan
Hashmi, Imtiaz
Comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hybrid instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery
title Comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hybrid instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery
title_full Comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hybrid instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery
title_fullStr Comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hybrid instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hybrid instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery
title_short Comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hybrid instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery
title_sort comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hybrid instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5006467/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27695235
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-3147.185510
work_keys_str_mv AT rafisohail comparativeanalysisofpediclescrewversushybridinstrumentationinadolescentidiopathicscoliosissurgery
AT munshinaseem comparativeanalysisofpediclescrewversushybridinstrumentationinadolescentidiopathicscoliosissurgery
AT abbasasad comparativeanalysisofpediclescrewversushybridinstrumentationinadolescentidiopathicscoliosissurgery
AT shaikhrabiahassan comparativeanalysisofpediclescrewversushybridinstrumentationinadolescentidiopathicscoliosissurgery
AT hashmiimtiaz comparativeanalysisofpediclescrewversushybridinstrumentationinadolescentidiopathicscoliosissurgery