Cargando…
Comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hybrid instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery
INTRODUCTION: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis is the most common type of scoliosis. A Cobb angle of 50° will progress beyond the age of spinal maturity. Surgery over bracing is advised at a Cobb angle above or equal to 50°. The aim of surgery is to bring the Cobb angle down below 50° to prevent repr...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5006467/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27695235 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-3147.185510 |
_version_ | 1782451067653455872 |
---|---|
author | Rafi, Sohail Munshi, Naseem Abbas, Asad Shaikh, Rabia Hassan Hashmi, Imtiaz |
author_facet | Rafi, Sohail Munshi, Naseem Abbas, Asad Shaikh, Rabia Hassan Hashmi, Imtiaz |
author_sort | Rafi, Sohail |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis is the most common type of scoliosis. A Cobb angle of 50° will progress beyond the age of spinal maturity. Surgery over bracing is advised at a Cobb angle above or equal to 50°. The aim of surgery is to bring the Cobb angle down below 50° to prevent reprogression as well as improve the quality of life. The objective of the study is to analyze the efficacy and significance in lifestyle improvement of pedicle screw-only fixation system versus the more common hybrid instrumentation system used for the surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted involving two groups of patients were included in the study. One group was operated with pedicle screw-only method while the other with hybrid instrumentation system. The pre- and post-operative Cobb's angles were taken across a follow-up of 4 years. An SRS-30 questionnaire was given in a yearly follow-up to assess the lifestyle improvement of the patient. RESULTS: Pedicle screw-only method was significantly more effective in reducing Cobb's angle (P = 0.0487). It was showed less loss of correction (P = 0.009) pedicle screw-only surgery was also better at reducing thoracic curves (P = 0.001). There seemed a better recovery time with pedicle screw surgery (P = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Pedicle screws are more effective and durable than hybrid systems at when treating adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5006467 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50064672016-10-01 Comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hybrid instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery Rafi, Sohail Munshi, Naseem Abbas, Asad Shaikh, Rabia Hassan Hashmi, Imtiaz J Neurosci Rural Pract Original Article INTRODUCTION: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis is the most common type of scoliosis. A Cobb angle of 50° will progress beyond the age of spinal maturity. Surgery over bracing is advised at a Cobb angle above or equal to 50°. The aim of surgery is to bring the Cobb angle down below 50° to prevent reprogression as well as improve the quality of life. The objective of the study is to analyze the efficacy and significance in lifestyle improvement of pedicle screw-only fixation system versus the more common hybrid instrumentation system used for the surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted involving two groups of patients were included in the study. One group was operated with pedicle screw-only method while the other with hybrid instrumentation system. The pre- and post-operative Cobb's angles were taken across a follow-up of 4 years. An SRS-30 questionnaire was given in a yearly follow-up to assess the lifestyle improvement of the patient. RESULTS: Pedicle screw-only method was significantly more effective in reducing Cobb's angle (P = 0.0487). It was showed less loss of correction (P = 0.009) pedicle screw-only surgery was also better at reducing thoracic curves (P = 0.001). There seemed a better recovery time with pedicle screw surgery (P = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Pedicle screws are more effective and durable than hybrid systems at when treating adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5006467/ /pubmed/27695235 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-3147.185510 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Neurosciences in Rural Practice http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Rafi, Sohail Munshi, Naseem Abbas, Asad Shaikh, Rabia Hassan Hashmi, Imtiaz Comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hybrid instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery |
title | Comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hybrid instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery |
title_full | Comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hybrid instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery |
title_fullStr | Comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hybrid instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hybrid instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery |
title_short | Comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hybrid instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery |
title_sort | comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hybrid instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5006467/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27695235 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-3147.185510 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rafisohail comparativeanalysisofpediclescrewversushybridinstrumentationinadolescentidiopathicscoliosissurgery AT munshinaseem comparativeanalysisofpediclescrewversushybridinstrumentationinadolescentidiopathicscoliosissurgery AT abbasasad comparativeanalysisofpediclescrewversushybridinstrumentationinadolescentidiopathicscoliosissurgery AT shaikhrabiahassan comparativeanalysisofpediclescrewversushybridinstrumentationinadolescentidiopathicscoliosissurgery AT hashmiimtiaz comparativeanalysisofpediclescrewversushybridinstrumentationinadolescentidiopathicscoliosissurgery |