Cargando…

An exploratory study on equity in funding allocation for essential medicines and health supplies in Uganda’s public sector

BACKGROUND: To ascertain equity in financing for essential medicines and health supplies (EMHS) in Uganda, this paper explores the relationships among government funding allocations for EMHS, patient load, and medicines availability across facilities at different levels of care. METHODS: We collecte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kusemererwa, Donna, Alban, Anita, Obua, Ocwa Thomas, Trap, Birna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5006492/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27577997
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1698-6
_version_ 1782451073187840000
author Kusemererwa, Donna
Alban, Anita
Obua, Ocwa Thomas
Trap, Birna
author_facet Kusemererwa, Donna
Alban, Anita
Obua, Ocwa Thomas
Trap, Birna
author_sort Kusemererwa, Donna
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To ascertain equity in financing for essential medicines and health supplies (EMHS) in Uganda, this paper explores the relationships among government funding allocations for EMHS, patient load, and medicines availability across facilities at different levels of care. METHODS: We collected data on EMHS allocations and availability of selected vital medicines from 43 purposively sampled hospitals and the highest level health centers (HC IV), 44 randomly selected lower-level health facilities (HC II, III), and from over 400 facility health information system records and National Medical Stores records. The data were analyzed to determine allocations per patient within and across levels of care and the effects of allocations on product availability. RESULTS: EMHS funding allocations per patient varied widely within facilities at the same level, and allocations per patient between levels overlapped considerably. For example, HC IV allocations per patient ranged from US$0.25 to US$2.14 (1:9 ratio of lowest to highest allocation), and over 75 % of HC IV facilities had the same or lower average allocation per patient than HC III facilities. Overall, 43 % of all the facilities had optimal stock levels, 27 % were understocked, and 30 % were overstocked. Using simulations, we reduced the ratio between the highest and lowest allocations per patient within a level of care to less than two and eliminated the overlap in allocation per patient between levels. CONCLUSIONS: Inequity in EMHS allocation is demonstrated by the wide range of funding allocations per patient and the corresponding disparities in medicines availability. We show that using patient load to calculate EMHS allocations has the potential to improve equity significantly. However, more research in this area is urgently needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The article does not report any results of human participants. It is implemented in collaboration with the Uganda’s Ministry of Health, Pharmacy Division. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-016-1698-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5006492
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50064922016-09-01 An exploratory study on equity in funding allocation for essential medicines and health supplies in Uganda’s public sector Kusemererwa, Donna Alban, Anita Obua, Ocwa Thomas Trap, Birna BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: To ascertain equity in financing for essential medicines and health supplies (EMHS) in Uganda, this paper explores the relationships among government funding allocations for EMHS, patient load, and medicines availability across facilities at different levels of care. METHODS: We collected data on EMHS allocations and availability of selected vital medicines from 43 purposively sampled hospitals and the highest level health centers (HC IV), 44 randomly selected lower-level health facilities (HC II, III), and from over 400 facility health information system records and National Medical Stores records. The data were analyzed to determine allocations per patient within and across levels of care and the effects of allocations on product availability. RESULTS: EMHS funding allocations per patient varied widely within facilities at the same level, and allocations per patient between levels overlapped considerably. For example, HC IV allocations per patient ranged from US$0.25 to US$2.14 (1:9 ratio of lowest to highest allocation), and over 75 % of HC IV facilities had the same or lower average allocation per patient than HC III facilities. Overall, 43 % of all the facilities had optimal stock levels, 27 % were understocked, and 30 % were overstocked. Using simulations, we reduced the ratio between the highest and lowest allocations per patient within a level of care to less than two and eliminated the overlap in allocation per patient between levels. CONCLUSIONS: Inequity in EMHS allocation is demonstrated by the wide range of funding allocations per patient and the corresponding disparities in medicines availability. We show that using patient load to calculate EMHS allocations has the potential to improve equity significantly. However, more research in this area is urgently needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The article does not report any results of human participants. It is implemented in collaboration with the Uganda’s Ministry of Health, Pharmacy Division. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-016-1698-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5006492/ /pubmed/27577997 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1698-6 Text en © Kusemererwa et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kusemererwa, Donna
Alban, Anita
Obua, Ocwa Thomas
Trap, Birna
An exploratory study on equity in funding allocation for essential medicines and health supplies in Uganda’s public sector
title An exploratory study on equity in funding allocation for essential medicines and health supplies in Uganda’s public sector
title_full An exploratory study on equity in funding allocation for essential medicines and health supplies in Uganda’s public sector
title_fullStr An exploratory study on equity in funding allocation for essential medicines and health supplies in Uganda’s public sector
title_full_unstemmed An exploratory study on equity in funding allocation for essential medicines and health supplies in Uganda’s public sector
title_short An exploratory study on equity in funding allocation for essential medicines and health supplies in Uganda’s public sector
title_sort exploratory study on equity in funding allocation for essential medicines and health supplies in uganda’s public sector
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5006492/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27577997
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1698-6
work_keys_str_mv AT kusemererwadonna anexploratorystudyonequityinfundingallocationforessentialmedicinesandhealthsuppliesinugandaspublicsector
AT albananita anexploratorystudyonequityinfundingallocationforessentialmedicinesandhealthsuppliesinugandaspublicsector
AT obuaocwathomas anexploratorystudyonequityinfundingallocationforessentialmedicinesandhealthsuppliesinugandaspublicsector
AT trapbirna anexploratorystudyonequityinfundingallocationforessentialmedicinesandhealthsuppliesinugandaspublicsector
AT kusemererwadonna exploratorystudyonequityinfundingallocationforessentialmedicinesandhealthsuppliesinugandaspublicsector
AT albananita exploratorystudyonequityinfundingallocationforessentialmedicinesandhealthsuppliesinugandaspublicsector
AT obuaocwathomas exploratorystudyonequityinfundingallocationforessentialmedicinesandhealthsuppliesinugandaspublicsector
AT trapbirna exploratorystudyonequityinfundingallocationforessentialmedicinesandhealthsuppliesinugandaspublicsector