Cargando…

Measuring progress in maternal and newborn health care in Mexico: validating indicators of health system contact and quality of care

BACKGROUND: The majority of births in Mexico take place in a health facility and are attended by a skilled birth attendant, yet maternal mortality has not declined to anticipated levels. Coverage estimates of skilled attendance and other maternal and newborn interventions often rely on women’s self-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Blanc, Ann K., Diaz, Claudia, McCarthy, Katharine J., Berdichevsky, Karla
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5006493/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27577266
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-1047-0
_version_ 1782451073417478144
author Blanc, Ann K.
Diaz, Claudia
McCarthy, Katharine J.
Berdichevsky, Karla
author_facet Blanc, Ann K.
Diaz, Claudia
McCarthy, Katharine J.
Berdichevsky, Karla
author_sort Blanc, Ann K.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The majority of births in Mexico take place in a health facility and are attended by a skilled birth attendant, yet maternal mortality has not declined to anticipated levels. Coverage estimates of skilled attendance and other maternal and newborn interventions often rely on women’s self-report through a population-based survey, the accuracy of which is not well established. METHODS: We used a facility-based design to validate women’s report of skilled birth attendance, as well as other key elements of maternal, newborn intrapartum, and immediate postnatal care. Women’s reports of labor and delivery care were collected by exit interview prior to hospital discharge and were compared against direct observation by a trained third party in a Mexican public hospital (n = 597). For each indicator, validity was assessed at the individual level using the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) and at the population level using the inflation factor (IF). RESULTS: Five of 47 indicators met both validation criteria (AUC > 0.60 and 0.75 < IF < 1.25): urine sample screen, injection or IV medication received during labor, before the birth of the baby (i.e., uterotonic for either induction or augmentation of labor), episiotomy, excessive bleeding, and receipt of blood products. An additional 9 indicators met criteria for the AUC and 18 met criteria for the IF. A skilled attendant indicator had high sensitivity (90.1 %: 95 % CI: 87.1–92.5 %), low specificity (14.0 %: 95 % CI: 5.8–26.7 %) and was suitable for population-level estimation only. CONCLUSION: Women are able to give valid reports on some aspects of the content of care, although questions regarding the indication for interventions are less likely to be known. Questions that include technical terms or refer to specific time periods tended to have lower response levels. A key aspect of efforts to improve maternal and newborn health requires valid measurement of women’s access to maternal and newborn health interventions and the quality of such services. Additional work on improving measurement of population coverage indicators is warranted. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12884-016-1047-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5006493
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50064932016-09-01 Measuring progress in maternal and newborn health care in Mexico: validating indicators of health system contact and quality of care Blanc, Ann K. Diaz, Claudia McCarthy, Katharine J. Berdichevsky, Karla BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: The majority of births in Mexico take place in a health facility and are attended by a skilled birth attendant, yet maternal mortality has not declined to anticipated levels. Coverage estimates of skilled attendance and other maternal and newborn interventions often rely on women’s self-report through a population-based survey, the accuracy of which is not well established. METHODS: We used a facility-based design to validate women’s report of skilled birth attendance, as well as other key elements of maternal, newborn intrapartum, and immediate postnatal care. Women’s reports of labor and delivery care were collected by exit interview prior to hospital discharge and were compared against direct observation by a trained third party in a Mexican public hospital (n = 597). For each indicator, validity was assessed at the individual level using the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) and at the population level using the inflation factor (IF). RESULTS: Five of 47 indicators met both validation criteria (AUC > 0.60 and 0.75 < IF < 1.25): urine sample screen, injection or IV medication received during labor, before the birth of the baby (i.e., uterotonic for either induction or augmentation of labor), episiotomy, excessive bleeding, and receipt of blood products. An additional 9 indicators met criteria for the AUC and 18 met criteria for the IF. A skilled attendant indicator had high sensitivity (90.1 %: 95 % CI: 87.1–92.5 %), low specificity (14.0 %: 95 % CI: 5.8–26.7 %) and was suitable for population-level estimation only. CONCLUSION: Women are able to give valid reports on some aspects of the content of care, although questions regarding the indication for interventions are less likely to be known. Questions that include technical terms or refer to specific time periods tended to have lower response levels. A key aspect of efforts to improve maternal and newborn health requires valid measurement of women’s access to maternal and newborn health interventions and the quality of such services. Additional work on improving measurement of population coverage indicators is warranted. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12884-016-1047-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5006493/ /pubmed/27577266 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-1047-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Blanc, Ann K.
Diaz, Claudia
McCarthy, Katharine J.
Berdichevsky, Karla
Measuring progress in maternal and newborn health care in Mexico: validating indicators of health system contact and quality of care
title Measuring progress in maternal and newborn health care in Mexico: validating indicators of health system contact and quality of care
title_full Measuring progress in maternal and newborn health care in Mexico: validating indicators of health system contact and quality of care
title_fullStr Measuring progress in maternal and newborn health care in Mexico: validating indicators of health system contact and quality of care
title_full_unstemmed Measuring progress in maternal and newborn health care in Mexico: validating indicators of health system contact and quality of care
title_short Measuring progress in maternal and newborn health care in Mexico: validating indicators of health system contact and quality of care
title_sort measuring progress in maternal and newborn health care in mexico: validating indicators of health system contact and quality of care
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5006493/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27577266
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-1047-0
work_keys_str_mv AT blancannk measuringprogressinmaternalandnewbornhealthcareinmexicovalidatingindicatorsofhealthsystemcontactandqualityofcare
AT diazclaudia measuringprogressinmaternalandnewbornhealthcareinmexicovalidatingindicatorsofhealthsystemcontactandqualityofcare
AT mccarthykatharinej measuringprogressinmaternalandnewbornhealthcareinmexicovalidatingindicatorsofhealthsystemcontactandqualityofcare
AT berdichevskykarla measuringprogressinmaternalandnewbornhealthcareinmexicovalidatingindicatorsofhealthsystemcontactandqualityofcare