Cargando…

Evolutionary pathways to convergence in plumage patterns

BACKGROUND: Avian plumage is ideal for investigating phenotypic convergence because of repeated evolution of the same within-feather patterns. In birds, there are three major types of regular patterns within feathers: scales, bars and spots. Existing models of within-feather pattern development sugg...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gluckman, Thanh-Lan, Mundy, Nicholas I.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5006497/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27582082
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12862-016-0741-x
_version_ 1782451074318204928
author Gluckman, Thanh-Lan
Mundy, Nicholas I.
author_facet Gluckman, Thanh-Lan
Mundy, Nicholas I.
author_sort Gluckman, Thanh-Lan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Avian plumage is ideal for investigating phenotypic convergence because of repeated evolution of the same within-feather patterns. In birds, there are three major types of regular patterns within feathers: scales, bars and spots. Existing models of within-feather pattern development suggest that scales have the simplest developmental mechanism, bars require more stringent regulation than scales, and spots have the strictest developmental parameters. We hypothesized that increasing stringency in the mechanism of pattern formation predicts the evolutionary trajectory of patterns, and hence scales should evolve first, followed by bars and finally spots. Here, using Bayesian phylogenetic modeling we reconstructed pattern evolution in the most spectacularly patterned avian clades – aquatic waterfowl (Anseriformes) and terrestrial gamebirds (Galliformes). RESULTS: Our analyses suggest that the ancestral state of plumage is an absence of patterns, but with some variability. Independent analyses of seven feather patches reveal that spots evolve after bars and scales. However, both scales and bars evolve frequently from an absence of patterns, contradicting our predictions. Over the whole body, many constraints are conserved from the level of patches, for example the largest number of steps from the ancestral state was required for spots to evolve. CONCLUSIONS: Overall there was remarkable similarity in the inferred evolutionary trajectories of plumage pattern evolution in Galliformes and Anseriformes, suggesting that developmental constraint is similar in these two orders, despite large ecological differences. These evolutionary transitions are largely congruent with a reaction–diffusion based model of pattern formation, but the evolution of bars from an unpatterned ancestor is more common than expected. Our study highlights the promise of testing models of development using comparative methods. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12862-016-0741-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5006497
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50064972016-09-01 Evolutionary pathways to convergence in plumage patterns Gluckman, Thanh-Lan Mundy, Nicholas I. BMC Evol Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: Avian plumage is ideal for investigating phenotypic convergence because of repeated evolution of the same within-feather patterns. In birds, there are three major types of regular patterns within feathers: scales, bars and spots. Existing models of within-feather pattern development suggest that scales have the simplest developmental mechanism, bars require more stringent regulation than scales, and spots have the strictest developmental parameters. We hypothesized that increasing stringency in the mechanism of pattern formation predicts the evolutionary trajectory of patterns, and hence scales should evolve first, followed by bars and finally spots. Here, using Bayesian phylogenetic modeling we reconstructed pattern evolution in the most spectacularly patterned avian clades – aquatic waterfowl (Anseriformes) and terrestrial gamebirds (Galliformes). RESULTS: Our analyses suggest that the ancestral state of plumage is an absence of patterns, but with some variability. Independent analyses of seven feather patches reveal that spots evolve after bars and scales. However, both scales and bars evolve frequently from an absence of patterns, contradicting our predictions. Over the whole body, many constraints are conserved from the level of patches, for example the largest number of steps from the ancestral state was required for spots to evolve. CONCLUSIONS: Overall there was remarkable similarity in the inferred evolutionary trajectories of plumage pattern evolution in Galliformes and Anseriformes, suggesting that developmental constraint is similar in these two orders, despite large ecological differences. These evolutionary transitions are largely congruent with a reaction–diffusion based model of pattern formation, but the evolution of bars from an unpatterned ancestor is more common than expected. Our study highlights the promise of testing models of development using comparative methods. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12862-016-0741-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5006497/ /pubmed/27582082 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12862-016-0741-x Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gluckman, Thanh-Lan
Mundy, Nicholas I.
Evolutionary pathways to convergence in plumage patterns
title Evolutionary pathways to convergence in plumage patterns
title_full Evolutionary pathways to convergence in plumage patterns
title_fullStr Evolutionary pathways to convergence in plumage patterns
title_full_unstemmed Evolutionary pathways to convergence in plumage patterns
title_short Evolutionary pathways to convergence in plumage patterns
title_sort evolutionary pathways to convergence in plumage patterns
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5006497/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27582082
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12862-016-0741-x
work_keys_str_mv AT gluckmanthanhlan evolutionarypathwaystoconvergenceinplumagepatterns
AT mundynicholasi evolutionarypathwaystoconvergenceinplumagepatterns