Cargando…
Validation of the flemish CARES, a quality of life and needs assessment tool for cancer care
BACKGROUND: The Cancer Rehabilitation Evaluation System (CARES) is a quality of life (QOL) and needs assessment instrument of US origin that was developed in the 90’s. Since November 2012 the copyright and user fee were abolished and the instrument became publicly available the present study aims to...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5006609/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27576341 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2728-9 |
_version_ | 1782451099449425920 |
---|---|
author | Schouten, Bojoura Hellings, Johan Van Hoof, Elke Vankrunkelsven, Patrick Bulens, Paul Buntinx, Frank Mebis, Jeroen Vandijck, Dominique Schrooten, Ward |
author_facet | Schouten, Bojoura Hellings, Johan Van Hoof, Elke Vankrunkelsven, Patrick Bulens, Paul Buntinx, Frank Mebis, Jeroen Vandijck, Dominique Schrooten, Ward |
author_sort | Schouten, Bojoura |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Cancer Rehabilitation Evaluation System (CARES) is a quality of life (QOL) and needs assessment instrument of US origin that was developed in the 90’s. Since November 2012 the copyright and user fee were abolished and the instrument became publicly available the present study aims to reinvestigate the psychometric properties of the CARES for the Flemish population in Belgium. METHODS: The CARES was translated into Flemish following a translation-back translation process. A sample of 192 cancer patients completed the CARES, concurrent measures, and questions on socio-demographic and medical data. Participants were asked to complete the CARES a second time 1 week later, followed by some questions on their experiences with the instrument. Internal consistency, test-retest reliability, content validity, construct validity, concurrent validity and feasibility of the CARES were subsequently assessed. RESULTS: The Flemish CARES version demonstrated excellent reliability with high internal consistency (range .87–.96) and test-retest ratings (range .70–.91) for all summary scales. Factor analysis replicated the original factor solution of five higher order factors with factor loadings of .325–.851. Correlations with other instruments ranging from |.43|–|.75| confirmed concurrent validity. Feasibility was indicated by the low number of missing items (mean 2.3; SD 5.0) and positive feedback of participants on the instrument. CONCLUSIONS: The Flemish CARES has strong psychometric properties and can as such be a valid tool to assess cancer patients’ QOL and needs in research, for example in international comparisons. The positive feedback of participants on the CARES support the usefulness of this tool for systematic assessment of cancer patients’ well-being and care needs in clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02282696 (July 16, 2014). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12885-016-2728-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5006609 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50066092016-09-01 Validation of the flemish CARES, a quality of life and needs assessment tool for cancer care Schouten, Bojoura Hellings, Johan Van Hoof, Elke Vankrunkelsven, Patrick Bulens, Paul Buntinx, Frank Mebis, Jeroen Vandijck, Dominique Schrooten, Ward BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: The Cancer Rehabilitation Evaluation System (CARES) is a quality of life (QOL) and needs assessment instrument of US origin that was developed in the 90’s. Since November 2012 the copyright and user fee were abolished and the instrument became publicly available the present study aims to reinvestigate the psychometric properties of the CARES for the Flemish population in Belgium. METHODS: The CARES was translated into Flemish following a translation-back translation process. A sample of 192 cancer patients completed the CARES, concurrent measures, and questions on socio-demographic and medical data. Participants were asked to complete the CARES a second time 1 week later, followed by some questions on their experiences with the instrument. Internal consistency, test-retest reliability, content validity, construct validity, concurrent validity and feasibility of the CARES were subsequently assessed. RESULTS: The Flemish CARES version demonstrated excellent reliability with high internal consistency (range .87–.96) and test-retest ratings (range .70–.91) for all summary scales. Factor analysis replicated the original factor solution of five higher order factors with factor loadings of .325–.851. Correlations with other instruments ranging from |.43|–|.75| confirmed concurrent validity. Feasibility was indicated by the low number of missing items (mean 2.3; SD 5.0) and positive feedback of participants on the instrument. CONCLUSIONS: The Flemish CARES has strong psychometric properties and can as such be a valid tool to assess cancer patients’ QOL and needs in research, for example in international comparisons. The positive feedback of participants on the CARES support the usefulness of this tool for systematic assessment of cancer patients’ well-being and care needs in clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02282696 (July 16, 2014). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12885-016-2728-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5006609/ /pubmed/27576341 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2728-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Schouten, Bojoura Hellings, Johan Van Hoof, Elke Vankrunkelsven, Patrick Bulens, Paul Buntinx, Frank Mebis, Jeroen Vandijck, Dominique Schrooten, Ward Validation of the flemish CARES, a quality of life and needs assessment tool for cancer care |
title | Validation of the flemish CARES, a quality of life and needs assessment tool for cancer care |
title_full | Validation of the flemish CARES, a quality of life and needs assessment tool for cancer care |
title_fullStr | Validation of the flemish CARES, a quality of life and needs assessment tool for cancer care |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of the flemish CARES, a quality of life and needs assessment tool for cancer care |
title_short | Validation of the flemish CARES, a quality of life and needs assessment tool for cancer care |
title_sort | validation of the flemish cares, a quality of life and needs assessment tool for cancer care |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5006609/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27576341 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2728-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schoutenbojoura validationoftheflemishcaresaqualityoflifeandneedsassessmenttoolforcancercare AT hellingsjohan validationoftheflemishcaresaqualityoflifeandneedsassessmenttoolforcancercare AT vanhoofelke validationoftheflemishcaresaqualityoflifeandneedsassessmenttoolforcancercare AT vankrunkelsvenpatrick validationoftheflemishcaresaqualityoflifeandneedsassessmenttoolforcancercare AT bulenspaul validationoftheflemishcaresaqualityoflifeandneedsassessmenttoolforcancercare AT buntinxfrank validationoftheflemishcaresaqualityoflifeandneedsassessmenttoolforcancercare AT mebisjeroen validationoftheflemishcaresaqualityoflifeandneedsassessmenttoolforcancercare AT vandijckdominique validationoftheflemishcaresaqualityoflifeandneedsassessmenttoolforcancercare AT schrootenward validationoftheflemishcaresaqualityoflifeandneedsassessmenttoolforcancercare |