Cargando…
The Danish Neuro-Oncology Registry: establishment, completeness and validity
BACKGROUND: The Danish Neuro-Oncology Registry (DNOR) is a nationwide clinical cancer database that has prospectively registered data on patients with gliomas since January 2009. The purpose of this study was to describe the establishment of the DNOR and further to evaluate the database completeness...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5006621/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27576510 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-016-2233-x |
_version_ | 1782451101971251200 |
---|---|
author | Hansen, Steinbjørn Nielsen, Jan Laursen, René J. Rasmussen, Birthe Krogh Nørgård, Bente Mertz Gradel, Kim Oren Guldberg, Rikke |
author_facet | Hansen, Steinbjørn Nielsen, Jan Laursen, René J. Rasmussen, Birthe Krogh Nørgård, Bente Mertz Gradel, Kim Oren Guldberg, Rikke |
author_sort | Hansen, Steinbjørn |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Danish Neuro-Oncology Registry (DNOR) is a nationwide clinical cancer database that has prospectively registered data on patients with gliomas since January 2009. The purpose of this study was to describe the establishment of the DNOR and further to evaluate the database completeness of patient registration and validity of data. METHODS: The completeness of the number of patients registered in the database was evaluated in the study period from January 2009 through December 2014 by comparing cases reported to the DNOR with the Danish National Patient Registry and the Danish Pathology Registry. The data validity of important clinical variables was evaluated by a random sample of 100 patients from the DNOR using the medical records as reference. RESULTS: A total of 2241 patients were registered in the DNOR by December 2014 with an overall patient completeness of 92 %, which increased during the study period (from 78 % in 2009 to 96 % in 2014). Medical records were available for all patients in the validity analyses. Most variables showed a high agreement proportion (56–100 %), with a fair to good chance-corrected agreement (k = 0.43–1.0). CONCLUSIONS: The completeness of patient registration was very high (92 %) and the validity of the most important patient data was good. The DNOR is a newly established national database, which is a reliable source for future scientific studies and clinical quality assessments among patients with gliomas. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5006621 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50066212016-09-01 The Danish Neuro-Oncology Registry: establishment, completeness and validity Hansen, Steinbjørn Nielsen, Jan Laursen, René J. Rasmussen, Birthe Krogh Nørgård, Bente Mertz Gradel, Kim Oren Guldberg, Rikke BMC Res Notes Research Article BACKGROUND: The Danish Neuro-Oncology Registry (DNOR) is a nationwide clinical cancer database that has prospectively registered data on patients with gliomas since January 2009. The purpose of this study was to describe the establishment of the DNOR and further to evaluate the database completeness of patient registration and validity of data. METHODS: The completeness of the number of patients registered in the database was evaluated in the study period from January 2009 through December 2014 by comparing cases reported to the DNOR with the Danish National Patient Registry and the Danish Pathology Registry. The data validity of important clinical variables was evaluated by a random sample of 100 patients from the DNOR using the medical records as reference. RESULTS: A total of 2241 patients were registered in the DNOR by December 2014 with an overall patient completeness of 92 %, which increased during the study period (from 78 % in 2009 to 96 % in 2014). Medical records were available for all patients in the validity analyses. Most variables showed a high agreement proportion (56–100 %), with a fair to good chance-corrected agreement (k = 0.43–1.0). CONCLUSIONS: The completeness of patient registration was very high (92 %) and the validity of the most important patient data was good. The DNOR is a newly established national database, which is a reliable source for future scientific studies and clinical quality assessments among patients with gliomas. BioMed Central 2016-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5006621/ /pubmed/27576510 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-016-2233-x Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Hansen, Steinbjørn Nielsen, Jan Laursen, René J. Rasmussen, Birthe Krogh Nørgård, Bente Mertz Gradel, Kim Oren Guldberg, Rikke The Danish Neuro-Oncology Registry: establishment, completeness and validity |
title | The Danish Neuro-Oncology Registry: establishment, completeness and validity |
title_full | The Danish Neuro-Oncology Registry: establishment, completeness and validity |
title_fullStr | The Danish Neuro-Oncology Registry: establishment, completeness and validity |
title_full_unstemmed | The Danish Neuro-Oncology Registry: establishment, completeness and validity |
title_short | The Danish Neuro-Oncology Registry: establishment, completeness and validity |
title_sort | danish neuro-oncology registry: establishment, completeness and validity |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5006621/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27576510 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-016-2233-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hansensteinbjørn thedanishneurooncologyregistryestablishmentcompletenessandvalidity AT nielsenjan thedanishneurooncologyregistryestablishmentcompletenessandvalidity AT laursenrenej thedanishneurooncologyregistryestablishmentcompletenessandvalidity AT rasmussenbirthekrogh thedanishneurooncologyregistryestablishmentcompletenessandvalidity AT nørgardbentemertz thedanishneurooncologyregistryestablishmentcompletenessandvalidity AT gradelkimoren thedanishneurooncologyregistryestablishmentcompletenessandvalidity AT guldbergrikke thedanishneurooncologyregistryestablishmentcompletenessandvalidity AT hansensteinbjørn danishneurooncologyregistryestablishmentcompletenessandvalidity AT nielsenjan danishneurooncologyregistryestablishmentcompletenessandvalidity AT laursenrenej danishneurooncologyregistryestablishmentcompletenessandvalidity AT rasmussenbirthekrogh danishneurooncologyregistryestablishmentcompletenessandvalidity AT nørgardbentemertz danishneurooncologyregistryestablishmentcompletenessandvalidity AT gradelkimoren danishneurooncologyregistryestablishmentcompletenessandvalidity AT guldbergrikke danishneurooncologyregistryestablishmentcompletenessandvalidity |