Cargando…

Extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal laparoscopic radical cystectomy for selected elderly bladder cancer patients: a single center experience

OBJECTIVE: This study reports the initial experience of extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical cystectomy (ELRC) and compared with transperitoneal laparoscopic radical cystectomy (TLRC) in the treatment of selected elderly bladder cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of forty male bladder ca...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Feng, Lang, Song, Jian, Wu, Menghua, Tian, Ye, Zhang, Daoxin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5006759/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27564274
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.0608
_version_ 1782451117307723776
author Feng, Lang
Song, Jian
Wu, Menghua
Tian, Ye
Zhang, Daoxin
author_facet Feng, Lang
Song, Jian
Wu, Menghua
Tian, Ye
Zhang, Daoxin
author_sort Feng, Lang
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study reports the initial experience of extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical cystectomy (ELRC) and compared with transperitoneal laparoscopic radical cystectomy (TLRC) in the treatment of selected elderly bladder cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of forty male bladder cancer patients who underwent ELRC (n=19) or TLRC (n=21) with ureterocutaneostomy were investigated. Demographic parameters, perioperative variables, oncological outcomes and follow-up data were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: A significantly shorter time to exsufflation (1.5±0.7 vs 2.1±1.1 d; p=0.026) and liquid intake (1.8±0.9 vs 2.8±1.9 d; p=0.035) were observed in the ELRC group compared with the TLRC group. The incidence of postoperative ileus in the ELRC group was lower than the TLRC group (0 vs 9.5%). However, the difference had no statistical significance (p>0.05). The removed lymph node number in the ELRC group was significantly lower than the TLRC group (p<0.001). No significant differences were observed between the two groups in the overall and cancer-free survival rates (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: ELRC seems to be a safe and feasible surgical strategy for the selected elderly bladder cancer patients with ≤ T2 disease. The surgical and oncological efficacy of the ELRC is similar to that of the TLRC, but with faster intestinal function recovery. Further studies with a large series including different urinary diversions are needed to confirm our results and to better evaluate the benefit of ELRC in bladder cancer patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5006759
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50067592016-09-06 Extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal laparoscopic radical cystectomy for selected elderly bladder cancer patients: a single center experience Feng, Lang Song, Jian Wu, Menghua Tian, Ye Zhang, Daoxin Int Braz J Urol Original Article OBJECTIVE: This study reports the initial experience of extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical cystectomy (ELRC) and compared with transperitoneal laparoscopic radical cystectomy (TLRC) in the treatment of selected elderly bladder cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of forty male bladder cancer patients who underwent ELRC (n=19) or TLRC (n=21) with ureterocutaneostomy were investigated. Demographic parameters, perioperative variables, oncological outcomes and follow-up data were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: A significantly shorter time to exsufflation (1.5±0.7 vs 2.1±1.1 d; p=0.026) and liquid intake (1.8±0.9 vs 2.8±1.9 d; p=0.035) were observed in the ELRC group compared with the TLRC group. The incidence of postoperative ileus in the ELRC group was lower than the TLRC group (0 vs 9.5%). However, the difference had no statistical significance (p>0.05). The removed lymph node number in the ELRC group was significantly lower than the TLRC group (p<0.001). No significant differences were observed between the two groups in the overall and cancer-free survival rates (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: ELRC seems to be a safe and feasible surgical strategy for the selected elderly bladder cancer patients with ≤ T2 disease. The surgical and oncological efficacy of the ELRC is similar to that of the TLRC, but with faster intestinal function recovery. Further studies with a large series including different urinary diversions are needed to confirm our results and to better evaluate the benefit of ELRC in bladder cancer patients. Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5006759/ /pubmed/27564274 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.0608 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Feng, Lang
Song, Jian
Wu, Menghua
Tian, Ye
Zhang, Daoxin
Extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal laparoscopic radical cystectomy for selected elderly bladder cancer patients: a single center experience
title Extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal laparoscopic radical cystectomy for selected elderly bladder cancer patients: a single center experience
title_full Extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal laparoscopic radical cystectomy for selected elderly bladder cancer patients: a single center experience
title_fullStr Extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal laparoscopic radical cystectomy for selected elderly bladder cancer patients: a single center experience
title_full_unstemmed Extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal laparoscopic radical cystectomy for selected elderly bladder cancer patients: a single center experience
title_short Extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal laparoscopic radical cystectomy for selected elderly bladder cancer patients: a single center experience
title_sort extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal laparoscopic radical cystectomy for selected elderly bladder cancer patients: a single center experience
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5006759/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27564274
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.0608
work_keys_str_mv AT fenglang extraperitonealversustransperitoneallaparoscopicradicalcystectomyforselectedelderlybladdercancerpatientsasinglecenterexperience
AT songjian extraperitonealversustransperitoneallaparoscopicradicalcystectomyforselectedelderlybladdercancerpatientsasinglecenterexperience
AT wumenghua extraperitonealversustransperitoneallaparoscopicradicalcystectomyforselectedelderlybladdercancerpatientsasinglecenterexperience
AT tianye extraperitonealversustransperitoneallaparoscopicradicalcystectomyforselectedelderlybladdercancerpatientsasinglecenterexperience
AT zhangdaoxin extraperitonealversustransperitoneallaparoscopicradicalcystectomyforselectedelderlybladdercancerpatientsasinglecenterexperience