Cargando…
Uterine preservation for advanced pelvic organ prolapse repair: Anatomical results and patient satisfaction
OBJECTIVE: The aims of the current study were to evaluate outcomes and patient satisfaction in cases of uterine prolapse treated with vaginal mesh, while preserving the uterus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study that included all patients operated for prolapse repair with tr...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5006774/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27564289 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.0656 |
_version_ | 1782451120726081536 |
---|---|
author | Fink, Keshet Shachar, Inbar Ben Braun, Naama Marcus |
author_facet | Fink, Keshet Shachar, Inbar Ben Braun, Naama Marcus |
author_sort | Fink, Keshet |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The aims of the current study were to evaluate outcomes and patient satisfaction in cases of uterine prolapse treated with vaginal mesh, while preserving the uterus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study that included all patients operated for prolapse repair with trocar-less vaginal mesh while preserving the uterus between October 2010 and March 2013. Data included: patients pre-and post-operative symptoms, POP-Q and operative complications. Success was defined as prolapse < than stage 2. A telephone survey questionnaire was used to evaluate patient's satisfaction. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients with pelvic organ prolapse stage 3, including uterine pro-lapse of at least stage 2 (mean point C at+1.4 (range+8-(-1)) were included. Mean follow-up was 22 months. Success rate of the vaginal mesh procedure aimed to repair uterine prolapse was 92% (61/66), with mean point C at −6.7 (range (-1) - (-9)). No major intra-or post-operative complication occurred. A telephone survey questionnaire was conducted post-operatively 28 months on average. Ninety-eight percent of women were satisfied with the decision to preserve their uterus. Eighteen patients (34%) received prior consultation elsewhere for hysterectomy due to their prolapse, and decided to have the operation at our center in order to preserve the uterus. CONCLUSIONS: Uterine preservation with vaginal mesh was found to be a safe and effective treatment, even in cases with advanced uterine prolapse. Most patients prefer to keep their uterus. Uterus preservation options should be discussed with every patient before surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5006774 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50067742016-09-06 Uterine preservation for advanced pelvic organ prolapse repair: Anatomical results and patient satisfaction Fink, Keshet Shachar, Inbar Ben Braun, Naama Marcus Int Braz J Urol Original Article OBJECTIVE: The aims of the current study were to evaluate outcomes and patient satisfaction in cases of uterine prolapse treated with vaginal mesh, while preserving the uterus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study that included all patients operated for prolapse repair with trocar-less vaginal mesh while preserving the uterus between October 2010 and March 2013. Data included: patients pre-and post-operative symptoms, POP-Q and operative complications. Success was defined as prolapse < than stage 2. A telephone survey questionnaire was used to evaluate patient's satisfaction. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients with pelvic organ prolapse stage 3, including uterine pro-lapse of at least stage 2 (mean point C at+1.4 (range+8-(-1)) were included. Mean follow-up was 22 months. Success rate of the vaginal mesh procedure aimed to repair uterine prolapse was 92% (61/66), with mean point C at −6.7 (range (-1) - (-9)). No major intra-or post-operative complication occurred. A telephone survey questionnaire was conducted post-operatively 28 months on average. Ninety-eight percent of women were satisfied with the decision to preserve their uterus. Eighteen patients (34%) received prior consultation elsewhere for hysterectomy due to their prolapse, and decided to have the operation at our center in order to preserve the uterus. CONCLUSIONS: Uterine preservation with vaginal mesh was found to be a safe and effective treatment, even in cases with advanced uterine prolapse. Most patients prefer to keep their uterus. Uterus preservation options should be discussed with every patient before surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5006774/ /pubmed/27564289 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.0656 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Fink, Keshet Shachar, Inbar Ben Braun, Naama Marcus Uterine preservation for advanced pelvic organ prolapse repair: Anatomical results and patient satisfaction |
title | Uterine preservation for advanced pelvic organ prolapse repair: Anatomical results and patient satisfaction |
title_full | Uterine preservation for advanced pelvic organ prolapse repair: Anatomical results and patient satisfaction |
title_fullStr | Uterine preservation for advanced pelvic organ prolapse repair: Anatomical results and patient satisfaction |
title_full_unstemmed | Uterine preservation for advanced pelvic organ prolapse repair: Anatomical results and patient satisfaction |
title_short | Uterine preservation for advanced pelvic organ prolapse repair: Anatomical results and patient satisfaction |
title_sort | uterine preservation for advanced pelvic organ prolapse repair: anatomical results and patient satisfaction |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5006774/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27564289 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.0656 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT finkkeshet uterinepreservationforadvancedpelvicorganprolapserepairanatomicalresultsandpatientsatisfaction AT shacharinbarben uterinepreservationforadvancedpelvicorganprolapserepairanatomicalresultsandpatientsatisfaction AT braunnaamamarcus uterinepreservationforadvancedpelvicorganprolapserepairanatomicalresultsandpatientsatisfaction |