Cargando…

Reliability and Validity of the Visual, Musculoskeletal, and Balance Complaints Questionnaire

PURPOSE: To evaluate the reliability and validity of the 15-item Visual, Musculoskeletal, and Balance Complaints Questionnaire (VMB) for people with visual impairments, using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and with Rasch analysis for use as an outcome measure. METHODS: Two studies evaluated the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lundqvist, Lars-Olov, Zetterlund, Christina, Richter, Hans O.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5006798/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27309524
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0000000000000902
_version_ 1782451126204891136
author Lundqvist, Lars-Olov
Zetterlund, Christina
Richter, Hans O.
author_facet Lundqvist, Lars-Olov
Zetterlund, Christina
Richter, Hans O.
author_sort Lundqvist, Lars-Olov
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate the reliability and validity of the 15-item Visual, Musculoskeletal, and Balance Complaints Questionnaire (VMB) for people with visual impairments, using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and with Rasch analysis for use as an outcome measure. METHODS: Two studies evaluated the VMB. In Study 1, VMB data were collected from 1249 out of 3063 individuals between 18 and 104 years old who were registered at a low vision center. CFA evaluated VMB factor structure and Rasch analysis evaluated VMB scale properties. In Study 2, a subsample of 52 individuals between 27 and 67 years old with visual impairments underwent further measurements. Visual clinical assessments, neck/scapular pain, and balance assessments were collected to evaluate the convergent validity of the VMB (i.e. the domain relationship with other, theoretically predicted measures). RESULTS: CFA supported the a priori three-factor structure of the VMB. The factor loadings of the items on their respective domains were all statistically significant. Rasch analysis indicated disordered categories and the original 10-point scale was subsequently replaced with a 5-point scale. Each VMB domain fitted the Rasch model, showing good metric properties, including unidimensionality (explained variances ≥66% and eigenvalues <1.9), person separation (1.86 to 2.29), reliability (0.87 to 0.94), item fit (infit MnSq’s >0.72 and outfit MnSq’s <1.47), targeting (0.30 to 0.50 logits), and insignificant differential item functioning (all DIFs but one <0.50 logits) from gender, age, and visual status. The three VMB domains correlated significantly with relevant visual, musculoskeletal, and balance assessments, demonstrating adequate convergent validity of the VMB. CONCLUSIONS: The VMB is a simple, inexpensive, and quick yet reliable and valid way to screen and evaluate concurrent visual, musculoskeletal, and balance complaints, with contribution to epidemiological and intervention research and potential clinical implications for the field of health services and low vision rehabilitation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5006798
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50067982016-09-06 Reliability and Validity of the Visual, Musculoskeletal, and Balance Complaints Questionnaire Lundqvist, Lars-Olov Zetterlund, Christina Richter, Hans O. Optom Vis Sci Original Articles PURPOSE: To evaluate the reliability and validity of the 15-item Visual, Musculoskeletal, and Balance Complaints Questionnaire (VMB) for people with visual impairments, using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and with Rasch analysis for use as an outcome measure. METHODS: Two studies evaluated the VMB. In Study 1, VMB data were collected from 1249 out of 3063 individuals between 18 and 104 years old who were registered at a low vision center. CFA evaluated VMB factor structure and Rasch analysis evaluated VMB scale properties. In Study 2, a subsample of 52 individuals between 27 and 67 years old with visual impairments underwent further measurements. Visual clinical assessments, neck/scapular pain, and balance assessments were collected to evaluate the convergent validity of the VMB (i.e. the domain relationship with other, theoretically predicted measures). RESULTS: CFA supported the a priori three-factor structure of the VMB. The factor loadings of the items on their respective domains were all statistically significant. Rasch analysis indicated disordered categories and the original 10-point scale was subsequently replaced with a 5-point scale. Each VMB domain fitted the Rasch model, showing good metric properties, including unidimensionality (explained variances ≥66% and eigenvalues <1.9), person separation (1.86 to 2.29), reliability (0.87 to 0.94), item fit (infit MnSq’s >0.72 and outfit MnSq’s <1.47), targeting (0.30 to 0.50 logits), and insignificant differential item functioning (all DIFs but one <0.50 logits) from gender, age, and visual status. The three VMB domains correlated significantly with relevant visual, musculoskeletal, and balance assessments, demonstrating adequate convergent validity of the VMB. CONCLUSIONS: The VMB is a simple, inexpensive, and quick yet reliable and valid way to screen and evaluate concurrent visual, musculoskeletal, and balance complaints, with contribution to epidemiological and intervention research and potential clinical implications for the field of health services and low vision rehabilitation. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2016-09 2016-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5006798/ /pubmed/27309524 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0000000000000902 Text en Copyright © 2016 American Academy of Optometry This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Lundqvist, Lars-Olov
Zetterlund, Christina
Richter, Hans O.
Reliability and Validity of the Visual, Musculoskeletal, and Balance Complaints Questionnaire
title Reliability and Validity of the Visual, Musculoskeletal, and Balance Complaints Questionnaire
title_full Reliability and Validity of the Visual, Musculoskeletal, and Balance Complaints Questionnaire
title_fullStr Reliability and Validity of the Visual, Musculoskeletal, and Balance Complaints Questionnaire
title_full_unstemmed Reliability and Validity of the Visual, Musculoskeletal, and Balance Complaints Questionnaire
title_short Reliability and Validity of the Visual, Musculoskeletal, and Balance Complaints Questionnaire
title_sort reliability and validity of the visual, musculoskeletal, and balance complaints questionnaire
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5006798/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27309524
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0000000000000902
work_keys_str_mv AT lundqvistlarsolov reliabilityandvalidityofthevisualmusculoskeletalandbalancecomplaintsquestionnaire
AT zetterlundchristina reliabilityandvalidityofthevisualmusculoskeletalandbalancecomplaintsquestionnaire
AT richterhanso reliabilityandvalidityofthevisualmusculoskeletalandbalancecomplaintsquestionnaire