Cargando…

Comparison of left ventricular ejection fraction values obtained using invasive contrast left ventriculography, two-dimensional echocardiography, and gated single-photon emission computed tomography

OBJECTIVES: Left ventricular ejection fraction can be measured by a variety of invasive and non-invasive cardiac techniques. This study assesses the relation of three diagnostic modalities to each other in the measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction: invasive contrast left ventriculography...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Garg, Nadish, Dresser, Thomas, Aggarwal, Kul, Gupta, Vishal, Mittal, Mayank K, Alpert, Martin A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5006806/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27621804
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2050312116655940
_version_ 1782451127809212416
author Garg, Nadish
Dresser, Thomas
Aggarwal, Kul
Gupta, Vishal
Mittal, Mayank K
Alpert, Martin A
author_facet Garg, Nadish
Dresser, Thomas
Aggarwal, Kul
Gupta, Vishal
Mittal, Mayank K
Alpert, Martin A
author_sort Garg, Nadish
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Left ventricular ejection fraction can be measured by a variety of invasive and non-invasive cardiac techniques. This study assesses the relation of three diagnostic modalities to each other in the measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction: invasive contrast left ventriculography, two-dimensional echocardiography, and quantitative gated single-photon emission computed tomography. METHODS: Retrospective chart review was conducted on 58 patients hospitalized with chest pain, who underwent left ventricular ejection fraction evaluation using each of the aforementioned modalities within a 3-month period not interrupted by myocardial infarction or revascularization. RESULTS: The mean left ventricular ejection fraction values were as follows: invasive contrast left ventriculography (0.44±0.15), two-dimensional echocardiography (0.46±0.13), and gated single-photon emission computed tomography (0.37±0.10). Correlations coefficients and associated p values were as follows: invasive contrast left ventriculography versus two-dimensional echocardiography (r=0.69, p<0.001), invasive contrast left ventriculography versus gated single-photon emission computed tomography (r=0.80, p<0.0001), and gated single-photon emission computed tomography versus two-dimensional echocardiography (r=0.69, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that strong positive correlations exist among the three techniques studied.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5006806
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50068062016-09-12 Comparison of left ventricular ejection fraction values obtained using invasive contrast left ventriculography, two-dimensional echocardiography, and gated single-photon emission computed tomography Garg, Nadish Dresser, Thomas Aggarwal, Kul Gupta, Vishal Mittal, Mayank K Alpert, Martin A SAGE Open Med Original Article OBJECTIVES: Left ventricular ejection fraction can be measured by a variety of invasive and non-invasive cardiac techniques. This study assesses the relation of three diagnostic modalities to each other in the measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction: invasive contrast left ventriculography, two-dimensional echocardiography, and quantitative gated single-photon emission computed tomography. METHODS: Retrospective chart review was conducted on 58 patients hospitalized with chest pain, who underwent left ventricular ejection fraction evaluation using each of the aforementioned modalities within a 3-month period not interrupted by myocardial infarction or revascularization. RESULTS: The mean left ventricular ejection fraction values were as follows: invasive contrast left ventriculography (0.44±0.15), two-dimensional echocardiography (0.46±0.13), and gated single-photon emission computed tomography (0.37±0.10). Correlations coefficients and associated p values were as follows: invasive contrast left ventriculography versus two-dimensional echocardiography (r=0.69, p<0.001), invasive contrast left ventriculography versus gated single-photon emission computed tomography (r=0.80, p<0.0001), and gated single-photon emission computed tomography versus two-dimensional echocardiography (r=0.69, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that strong positive correlations exist among the three techniques studied. SAGE Publications 2016-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5006806/ /pubmed/27621804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2050312116655940 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page(https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Article
Garg, Nadish
Dresser, Thomas
Aggarwal, Kul
Gupta, Vishal
Mittal, Mayank K
Alpert, Martin A
Comparison of left ventricular ejection fraction values obtained using invasive contrast left ventriculography, two-dimensional echocardiography, and gated single-photon emission computed tomography
title Comparison of left ventricular ejection fraction values obtained using invasive contrast left ventriculography, two-dimensional echocardiography, and gated single-photon emission computed tomography
title_full Comparison of left ventricular ejection fraction values obtained using invasive contrast left ventriculography, two-dimensional echocardiography, and gated single-photon emission computed tomography
title_fullStr Comparison of left ventricular ejection fraction values obtained using invasive contrast left ventriculography, two-dimensional echocardiography, and gated single-photon emission computed tomography
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of left ventricular ejection fraction values obtained using invasive contrast left ventriculography, two-dimensional echocardiography, and gated single-photon emission computed tomography
title_short Comparison of left ventricular ejection fraction values obtained using invasive contrast left ventriculography, two-dimensional echocardiography, and gated single-photon emission computed tomography
title_sort comparison of left ventricular ejection fraction values obtained using invasive contrast left ventriculography, two-dimensional echocardiography, and gated single-photon emission computed tomography
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5006806/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27621804
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2050312116655940
work_keys_str_mv AT gargnadish comparisonofleftventricularejectionfractionvaluesobtainedusinginvasivecontrastleftventriculographytwodimensionalechocardiographyandgatedsinglephotonemissioncomputedtomography
AT dresserthomas comparisonofleftventricularejectionfractionvaluesobtainedusinginvasivecontrastleftventriculographytwodimensionalechocardiographyandgatedsinglephotonemissioncomputedtomography
AT aggarwalkul comparisonofleftventricularejectionfractionvaluesobtainedusinginvasivecontrastleftventriculographytwodimensionalechocardiographyandgatedsinglephotonemissioncomputedtomography
AT guptavishal comparisonofleftventricularejectionfractionvaluesobtainedusinginvasivecontrastleftventriculographytwodimensionalechocardiographyandgatedsinglephotonemissioncomputedtomography
AT mittalmayankk comparisonofleftventricularejectionfractionvaluesobtainedusinginvasivecontrastleftventriculographytwodimensionalechocardiographyandgatedsinglephotonemissioncomputedtomography
AT alpertmartina comparisonofleftventricularejectionfractionvaluesobtainedusinginvasivecontrastleftventriculographytwodimensionalechocardiographyandgatedsinglephotonemissioncomputedtomography