Cargando…
Comparison of left ventricular ejection fraction values obtained using invasive contrast left ventriculography, two-dimensional echocardiography, and gated single-photon emission computed tomography
OBJECTIVES: Left ventricular ejection fraction can be measured by a variety of invasive and non-invasive cardiac techniques. This study assesses the relation of three diagnostic modalities to each other in the measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction: invasive contrast left ventriculography...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5006806/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27621804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2050312116655940 |
_version_ | 1782451127809212416 |
---|---|
author | Garg, Nadish Dresser, Thomas Aggarwal, Kul Gupta, Vishal Mittal, Mayank K Alpert, Martin A |
author_facet | Garg, Nadish Dresser, Thomas Aggarwal, Kul Gupta, Vishal Mittal, Mayank K Alpert, Martin A |
author_sort | Garg, Nadish |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Left ventricular ejection fraction can be measured by a variety of invasive and non-invasive cardiac techniques. This study assesses the relation of three diagnostic modalities to each other in the measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction: invasive contrast left ventriculography, two-dimensional echocardiography, and quantitative gated single-photon emission computed tomography. METHODS: Retrospective chart review was conducted on 58 patients hospitalized with chest pain, who underwent left ventricular ejection fraction evaluation using each of the aforementioned modalities within a 3-month period not interrupted by myocardial infarction or revascularization. RESULTS: The mean left ventricular ejection fraction values were as follows: invasive contrast left ventriculography (0.44±0.15), two-dimensional echocardiography (0.46±0.13), and gated single-photon emission computed tomography (0.37±0.10). Correlations coefficients and associated p values were as follows: invasive contrast left ventriculography versus two-dimensional echocardiography (r=0.69, p<0.001), invasive contrast left ventriculography versus gated single-photon emission computed tomography (r=0.80, p<0.0001), and gated single-photon emission computed tomography versus two-dimensional echocardiography (r=0.69, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that strong positive correlations exist among the three techniques studied. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5006806 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50068062016-09-12 Comparison of left ventricular ejection fraction values obtained using invasive contrast left ventriculography, two-dimensional echocardiography, and gated single-photon emission computed tomography Garg, Nadish Dresser, Thomas Aggarwal, Kul Gupta, Vishal Mittal, Mayank K Alpert, Martin A SAGE Open Med Original Article OBJECTIVES: Left ventricular ejection fraction can be measured by a variety of invasive and non-invasive cardiac techniques. This study assesses the relation of three diagnostic modalities to each other in the measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction: invasive contrast left ventriculography, two-dimensional echocardiography, and quantitative gated single-photon emission computed tomography. METHODS: Retrospective chart review was conducted on 58 patients hospitalized with chest pain, who underwent left ventricular ejection fraction evaluation using each of the aforementioned modalities within a 3-month period not interrupted by myocardial infarction or revascularization. RESULTS: The mean left ventricular ejection fraction values were as follows: invasive contrast left ventriculography (0.44±0.15), two-dimensional echocardiography (0.46±0.13), and gated single-photon emission computed tomography (0.37±0.10). Correlations coefficients and associated p values were as follows: invasive contrast left ventriculography versus two-dimensional echocardiography (r=0.69, p<0.001), invasive contrast left ventriculography versus gated single-photon emission computed tomography (r=0.80, p<0.0001), and gated single-photon emission computed tomography versus two-dimensional echocardiography (r=0.69, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that strong positive correlations exist among the three techniques studied. SAGE Publications 2016-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5006806/ /pubmed/27621804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2050312116655940 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page(https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Garg, Nadish Dresser, Thomas Aggarwal, Kul Gupta, Vishal Mittal, Mayank K Alpert, Martin A Comparison of left ventricular ejection fraction values obtained using invasive contrast left ventriculography, two-dimensional echocardiography, and gated single-photon emission computed tomography |
title | Comparison of left ventricular ejection fraction values obtained using invasive contrast left ventriculography, two-dimensional echocardiography, and gated single-photon emission computed tomography |
title_full | Comparison of left ventricular ejection fraction values obtained using invasive contrast left ventriculography, two-dimensional echocardiography, and gated single-photon emission computed tomography |
title_fullStr | Comparison of left ventricular ejection fraction values obtained using invasive contrast left ventriculography, two-dimensional echocardiography, and gated single-photon emission computed tomography |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of left ventricular ejection fraction values obtained using invasive contrast left ventriculography, two-dimensional echocardiography, and gated single-photon emission computed tomography |
title_short | Comparison of left ventricular ejection fraction values obtained using invasive contrast left ventriculography, two-dimensional echocardiography, and gated single-photon emission computed tomography |
title_sort | comparison of left ventricular ejection fraction values obtained using invasive contrast left ventriculography, two-dimensional echocardiography, and gated single-photon emission computed tomography |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5006806/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27621804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2050312116655940 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gargnadish comparisonofleftventricularejectionfractionvaluesobtainedusinginvasivecontrastleftventriculographytwodimensionalechocardiographyandgatedsinglephotonemissioncomputedtomography AT dresserthomas comparisonofleftventricularejectionfractionvaluesobtainedusinginvasivecontrastleftventriculographytwodimensionalechocardiographyandgatedsinglephotonemissioncomputedtomography AT aggarwalkul comparisonofleftventricularejectionfractionvaluesobtainedusinginvasivecontrastleftventriculographytwodimensionalechocardiographyandgatedsinglephotonemissioncomputedtomography AT guptavishal comparisonofleftventricularejectionfractionvaluesobtainedusinginvasivecontrastleftventriculographytwodimensionalechocardiographyandgatedsinglephotonemissioncomputedtomography AT mittalmayankk comparisonofleftventricularejectionfractionvaluesobtainedusinginvasivecontrastleftventriculographytwodimensionalechocardiographyandgatedsinglephotonemissioncomputedtomography AT alpertmartina comparisonofleftventricularejectionfractionvaluesobtainedusinginvasivecontrastleftventriculographytwodimensionalechocardiographyandgatedsinglephotonemissioncomputedtomography |