Cargando…

Effectiveness and safety of dabigatran versus acenocoumarol in ‘real-world’ patients with atrial fibrillation

AIMS: Randomized trials showed non-inferior or superior results of the non-vitamin-K-antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) compared with warfarin. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of dabigatran (direct thrombin inhibitor) vs. acenocoumarol (vitamin K antagonist) in p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Korenstra, Jennie, Wijtvliet, E. Petra J., Veeger, Nic J.G.M., Geluk, Christiane A., Bartels, G. Louis, Posma, Jan L., Piersma-Wichers, Margriet, Van Gelder, Isabelle C., Rienstra, Michiel, Tieleman, Robert G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5006960/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26843571
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euv397
_version_ 1782451145247031296
author Korenstra, Jennie
Wijtvliet, E. Petra J.
Veeger, Nic J.G.M.
Geluk, Christiane A.
Bartels, G. Louis
Posma, Jan L.
Piersma-Wichers, Margriet
Van Gelder, Isabelle C.
Rienstra, Michiel
Tieleman, Robert G.
author_facet Korenstra, Jennie
Wijtvliet, E. Petra J.
Veeger, Nic J.G.M.
Geluk, Christiane A.
Bartels, G. Louis
Posma, Jan L.
Piersma-Wichers, Margriet
Van Gelder, Isabelle C.
Rienstra, Michiel
Tieleman, Robert G.
author_sort Korenstra, Jennie
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Randomized trials showed non-inferior or superior results of the non-vitamin-K-antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) compared with warfarin. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of dabigatran (direct thrombin inhibitor) vs. acenocoumarol (vitamin K antagonist) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) in daily clinical practice. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this observational study, we evaluated all consecutive patients who started anticoagulation because of AF in our outpatient clinic from 2010 to 2013. Data were collected from electronic patient charts. Primary outcomes were stroke or systemic embolism and major bleeding. Propensity score matching was applied to address the non-randomized design. In total, 920 consecutive AF patients were enrolled (442 dabigatran, 478 acenocoumarol), of which 2 × 383 were available for analysis after propensity score matching. Mean follow-up duration was 1.5 ± 0.56 year. The mean calculated stroke risk according to the CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc score was 3.5%/year in dabigatran vs. 3.7%/year acenocoumarol-treated patients. The actual incidence rate of stroke or systemic embolism was 0.8%/year [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.2–2.1] vs. 1.0%/year (95% CI: 0.4–2.1), respectively. Multivariable analysis confirmed this lower but non-significant risk in dabigatran vs. acenocoumarol after adjustment for the CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc score [hazard ratio (HR)(dabigatran) = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.20–2.63, P = 0.61]. According to the HAS-BLED score, the mean calculated bleeding risk was 1.7%/year in both groups. Actual incidence rate of major bleeding was 2.1%/year (95% CI: 1.0–3.8) in the dabigatran vs. 4.3%/year (95% CI: 2.9–6.2) in acenocoumarol. This over 50% reduction remained significant after adjustment for the HAS-BLED score (HR(dabigatran) = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.22–0.93, P = 0.031). CONCLUSION: In ‘real-world’ patients with AF, dabigatran appears to be as effective, but significantly safer than acenocoumarol.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5006960
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50069602016-09-01 Effectiveness and safety of dabigatran versus acenocoumarol in ‘real-world’ patients with atrial fibrillation Korenstra, Jennie Wijtvliet, E. Petra J. Veeger, Nic J.G.M. Geluk, Christiane A. Bartels, G. Louis Posma, Jan L. Piersma-Wichers, Margriet Van Gelder, Isabelle C. Rienstra, Michiel Tieleman, Robert G. Europace Clinical Research AIMS: Randomized trials showed non-inferior or superior results of the non-vitamin-K-antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) compared with warfarin. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of dabigatran (direct thrombin inhibitor) vs. acenocoumarol (vitamin K antagonist) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) in daily clinical practice. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this observational study, we evaluated all consecutive patients who started anticoagulation because of AF in our outpatient clinic from 2010 to 2013. Data were collected from electronic patient charts. Primary outcomes were stroke or systemic embolism and major bleeding. Propensity score matching was applied to address the non-randomized design. In total, 920 consecutive AF patients were enrolled (442 dabigatran, 478 acenocoumarol), of which 2 × 383 were available for analysis after propensity score matching. Mean follow-up duration was 1.5 ± 0.56 year. The mean calculated stroke risk according to the CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc score was 3.5%/year in dabigatran vs. 3.7%/year acenocoumarol-treated patients. The actual incidence rate of stroke or systemic embolism was 0.8%/year [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.2–2.1] vs. 1.0%/year (95% CI: 0.4–2.1), respectively. Multivariable analysis confirmed this lower but non-significant risk in dabigatran vs. acenocoumarol after adjustment for the CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc score [hazard ratio (HR)(dabigatran) = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.20–2.63, P = 0.61]. According to the HAS-BLED score, the mean calculated bleeding risk was 1.7%/year in both groups. Actual incidence rate of major bleeding was 2.1%/year (95% CI: 1.0–3.8) in the dabigatran vs. 4.3%/year (95% CI: 2.9–6.2) in acenocoumarol. This over 50% reduction remained significant after adjustment for the HAS-BLED score (HR(dabigatran) = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.22–0.93, P = 0.031). CONCLUSION: In ‘real-world’ patients with AF, dabigatran appears to be as effective, but significantly safer than acenocoumarol. Oxford University Press 2016-09 2016-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5006960/ /pubmed/26843571 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euv397 Text en © The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Clinical Research
Korenstra, Jennie
Wijtvliet, E. Petra J.
Veeger, Nic J.G.M.
Geluk, Christiane A.
Bartels, G. Louis
Posma, Jan L.
Piersma-Wichers, Margriet
Van Gelder, Isabelle C.
Rienstra, Michiel
Tieleman, Robert G.
Effectiveness and safety of dabigatran versus acenocoumarol in ‘real-world’ patients with atrial fibrillation
title Effectiveness and safety of dabigatran versus acenocoumarol in ‘real-world’ patients with atrial fibrillation
title_full Effectiveness and safety of dabigatran versus acenocoumarol in ‘real-world’ patients with atrial fibrillation
title_fullStr Effectiveness and safety of dabigatran versus acenocoumarol in ‘real-world’ patients with atrial fibrillation
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness and safety of dabigatran versus acenocoumarol in ‘real-world’ patients with atrial fibrillation
title_short Effectiveness and safety of dabigatran versus acenocoumarol in ‘real-world’ patients with atrial fibrillation
title_sort effectiveness and safety of dabigatran versus acenocoumarol in ‘real-world’ patients with atrial fibrillation
topic Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5006960/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26843571
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euv397
work_keys_str_mv AT korenstrajennie effectivenessandsafetyofdabigatranversusacenocoumarolinrealworldpatientswithatrialfibrillation
AT wijtvlietepetraj effectivenessandsafetyofdabigatranversusacenocoumarolinrealworldpatientswithatrialfibrillation
AT veegernicjgm effectivenessandsafetyofdabigatranversusacenocoumarolinrealworldpatientswithatrialfibrillation
AT gelukchristianea effectivenessandsafetyofdabigatranversusacenocoumarolinrealworldpatientswithatrialfibrillation
AT bartelsglouis effectivenessandsafetyofdabigatranversusacenocoumarolinrealworldpatientswithatrialfibrillation
AT posmajanl effectivenessandsafetyofdabigatranversusacenocoumarolinrealworldpatientswithatrialfibrillation
AT piersmawichersmargriet effectivenessandsafetyofdabigatranversusacenocoumarolinrealworldpatientswithatrialfibrillation
AT vangelderisabellec effectivenessandsafetyofdabigatranversusacenocoumarolinrealworldpatientswithatrialfibrillation
AT rienstramichiel effectivenessandsafetyofdabigatranversusacenocoumarolinrealworldpatientswithatrialfibrillation
AT tielemanrobertg effectivenessandsafetyofdabigatranversusacenocoumarolinrealworldpatientswithatrialfibrillation