Cargando…
Effectiveness and safety of dabigatran versus acenocoumarol in ‘real-world’ patients with atrial fibrillation
AIMS: Randomized trials showed non-inferior or superior results of the non-vitamin-K-antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) compared with warfarin. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of dabigatran (direct thrombin inhibitor) vs. acenocoumarol (vitamin K antagonist) in p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5006960/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26843571 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euv397 |
_version_ | 1782451145247031296 |
---|---|
author | Korenstra, Jennie Wijtvliet, E. Petra J. Veeger, Nic J.G.M. Geluk, Christiane A. Bartels, G. Louis Posma, Jan L. Piersma-Wichers, Margriet Van Gelder, Isabelle C. Rienstra, Michiel Tieleman, Robert G. |
author_facet | Korenstra, Jennie Wijtvliet, E. Petra J. Veeger, Nic J.G.M. Geluk, Christiane A. Bartels, G. Louis Posma, Jan L. Piersma-Wichers, Margriet Van Gelder, Isabelle C. Rienstra, Michiel Tieleman, Robert G. |
author_sort | Korenstra, Jennie |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: Randomized trials showed non-inferior or superior results of the non-vitamin-K-antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) compared with warfarin. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of dabigatran (direct thrombin inhibitor) vs. acenocoumarol (vitamin K antagonist) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) in daily clinical practice. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this observational study, we evaluated all consecutive patients who started anticoagulation because of AF in our outpatient clinic from 2010 to 2013. Data were collected from electronic patient charts. Primary outcomes were stroke or systemic embolism and major bleeding. Propensity score matching was applied to address the non-randomized design. In total, 920 consecutive AF patients were enrolled (442 dabigatran, 478 acenocoumarol), of which 2 × 383 were available for analysis after propensity score matching. Mean follow-up duration was 1.5 ± 0.56 year. The mean calculated stroke risk according to the CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc score was 3.5%/year in dabigatran vs. 3.7%/year acenocoumarol-treated patients. The actual incidence rate of stroke or systemic embolism was 0.8%/year [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.2–2.1] vs. 1.0%/year (95% CI: 0.4–2.1), respectively. Multivariable analysis confirmed this lower but non-significant risk in dabigatran vs. acenocoumarol after adjustment for the CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc score [hazard ratio (HR)(dabigatran) = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.20–2.63, P = 0.61]. According to the HAS-BLED score, the mean calculated bleeding risk was 1.7%/year in both groups. Actual incidence rate of major bleeding was 2.1%/year (95% CI: 1.0–3.8) in the dabigatran vs. 4.3%/year (95% CI: 2.9–6.2) in acenocoumarol. This over 50% reduction remained significant after adjustment for the HAS-BLED score (HR(dabigatran) = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.22–0.93, P = 0.031). CONCLUSION: In ‘real-world’ patients with AF, dabigatran appears to be as effective, but significantly safer than acenocoumarol. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5006960 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50069602016-09-01 Effectiveness and safety of dabigatran versus acenocoumarol in ‘real-world’ patients with atrial fibrillation Korenstra, Jennie Wijtvliet, E. Petra J. Veeger, Nic J.G.M. Geluk, Christiane A. Bartels, G. Louis Posma, Jan L. Piersma-Wichers, Margriet Van Gelder, Isabelle C. Rienstra, Michiel Tieleman, Robert G. Europace Clinical Research AIMS: Randomized trials showed non-inferior or superior results of the non-vitamin-K-antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) compared with warfarin. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of dabigatran (direct thrombin inhibitor) vs. acenocoumarol (vitamin K antagonist) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) in daily clinical practice. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this observational study, we evaluated all consecutive patients who started anticoagulation because of AF in our outpatient clinic from 2010 to 2013. Data were collected from electronic patient charts. Primary outcomes were stroke or systemic embolism and major bleeding. Propensity score matching was applied to address the non-randomized design. In total, 920 consecutive AF patients were enrolled (442 dabigatran, 478 acenocoumarol), of which 2 × 383 were available for analysis after propensity score matching. Mean follow-up duration was 1.5 ± 0.56 year. The mean calculated stroke risk according to the CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc score was 3.5%/year in dabigatran vs. 3.7%/year acenocoumarol-treated patients. The actual incidence rate of stroke or systemic embolism was 0.8%/year [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.2–2.1] vs. 1.0%/year (95% CI: 0.4–2.1), respectively. Multivariable analysis confirmed this lower but non-significant risk in dabigatran vs. acenocoumarol after adjustment for the CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc score [hazard ratio (HR)(dabigatran) = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.20–2.63, P = 0.61]. According to the HAS-BLED score, the mean calculated bleeding risk was 1.7%/year in both groups. Actual incidence rate of major bleeding was 2.1%/year (95% CI: 1.0–3.8) in the dabigatran vs. 4.3%/year (95% CI: 2.9–6.2) in acenocoumarol. This over 50% reduction remained significant after adjustment for the HAS-BLED score (HR(dabigatran) = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.22–0.93, P = 0.031). CONCLUSION: In ‘real-world’ patients with AF, dabigatran appears to be as effective, but significantly safer than acenocoumarol. Oxford University Press 2016-09 2016-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5006960/ /pubmed/26843571 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euv397 Text en © The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Clinical Research Korenstra, Jennie Wijtvliet, E. Petra J. Veeger, Nic J.G.M. Geluk, Christiane A. Bartels, G. Louis Posma, Jan L. Piersma-Wichers, Margriet Van Gelder, Isabelle C. Rienstra, Michiel Tieleman, Robert G. Effectiveness and safety of dabigatran versus acenocoumarol in ‘real-world’ patients with atrial fibrillation |
title | Effectiveness and safety of dabigatran versus acenocoumarol in ‘real-world’ patients with atrial fibrillation |
title_full | Effectiveness and safety of dabigatran versus acenocoumarol in ‘real-world’ patients with atrial fibrillation |
title_fullStr | Effectiveness and safety of dabigatran versus acenocoumarol in ‘real-world’ patients with atrial fibrillation |
title_full_unstemmed | Effectiveness and safety of dabigatran versus acenocoumarol in ‘real-world’ patients with atrial fibrillation |
title_short | Effectiveness and safety of dabigatran versus acenocoumarol in ‘real-world’ patients with atrial fibrillation |
title_sort | effectiveness and safety of dabigatran versus acenocoumarol in ‘real-world’ patients with atrial fibrillation |
topic | Clinical Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5006960/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26843571 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euv397 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT korenstrajennie effectivenessandsafetyofdabigatranversusacenocoumarolinrealworldpatientswithatrialfibrillation AT wijtvlietepetraj effectivenessandsafetyofdabigatranversusacenocoumarolinrealworldpatientswithatrialfibrillation AT veegernicjgm effectivenessandsafetyofdabigatranversusacenocoumarolinrealworldpatientswithatrialfibrillation AT gelukchristianea effectivenessandsafetyofdabigatranversusacenocoumarolinrealworldpatientswithatrialfibrillation AT bartelsglouis effectivenessandsafetyofdabigatranversusacenocoumarolinrealworldpatientswithatrialfibrillation AT posmajanl effectivenessandsafetyofdabigatranversusacenocoumarolinrealworldpatientswithatrialfibrillation AT piersmawichersmargriet effectivenessandsafetyofdabigatranversusacenocoumarolinrealworldpatientswithatrialfibrillation AT vangelderisabellec effectivenessandsafetyofdabigatranversusacenocoumarolinrealworldpatientswithatrialfibrillation AT rienstramichiel effectivenessandsafetyofdabigatranversusacenocoumarolinrealworldpatientswithatrialfibrillation AT tielemanrobertg effectivenessandsafetyofdabigatranversusacenocoumarolinrealworldpatientswithatrialfibrillation |