Cargando…

Type I IFN Signaling Is Dispensable during Secondary Viral Infection

Innate immune responses in general, and type I interferons (T1IFNs) in particular, play an important and often essential role during primary viral infections, by directly combatting the virus and by maximizing the primary adaptive immune response. Several studies have suggested that T1IFNs also cont...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hosking, Martin P., Flynn, Claudia T., Whitton, J. Lindsay
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5006979/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27580079
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1005861
_version_ 1782451149370032128
author Hosking, Martin P.
Flynn, Claudia T.
Whitton, J. Lindsay
author_facet Hosking, Martin P.
Flynn, Claudia T.
Whitton, J. Lindsay
author_sort Hosking, Martin P.
collection PubMed
description Innate immune responses in general, and type I interferons (T1IFNs) in particular, play an important and often essential role during primary viral infections, by directly combatting the virus and by maximizing the primary adaptive immune response. Several studies have suggested that T1IFNs also contribute very substantially to the secondary (recall) response; they are thought (i) to be required to drive the early attrition of memory T cells, (ii) to support the subsequent expansion of surviving virus-specific memory cells, and (iii) to assist in the suppression and clearance of the infectious agent. However, many of these observations were predicated upon models in which T1IFN signaling was interrupted prior to a primary immune response, raising the possibility that the resulting memory cells might be intrinsically abnormal. We have directly addressed this by using an inducible-Cre model system in which the host remains genetically-intact during the primary response to infection, and in which T1IFN signaling can be effectively ablated prior to secondary viral challenge. We report that, in stark contrast to primary infection, T1IFN signaling is not required during the recall response. IFNαβR-deficient memory CD8(+) and CD4(+) memory T cells undergo attrition and expansion with kinetics that are indistinguishable from those of receptor-sufficient cells. Moreover, even in the absence of functional T1IFN signaling, the host’s immune capacity to rapidly suppress, and then to eradicate, a secondary infection remains intact. Thus, this study shows that T1IFN signaling is dispensable during the recall response to a virus infection. Moreover, two broader implications may be drawn. First, a T cell’s requirement for a cytokine is highly dependent on the cell’s maturation / differentiation status. Consequently, second, these data underscore the importance of evaluating a gene’s impact by modulating its expression or function in a temporally-controllable manner.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5006979
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50069792016-09-27 Type I IFN Signaling Is Dispensable during Secondary Viral Infection Hosking, Martin P. Flynn, Claudia T. Whitton, J. Lindsay PLoS Pathog Research Article Innate immune responses in general, and type I interferons (T1IFNs) in particular, play an important and often essential role during primary viral infections, by directly combatting the virus and by maximizing the primary adaptive immune response. Several studies have suggested that T1IFNs also contribute very substantially to the secondary (recall) response; they are thought (i) to be required to drive the early attrition of memory T cells, (ii) to support the subsequent expansion of surviving virus-specific memory cells, and (iii) to assist in the suppression and clearance of the infectious agent. However, many of these observations were predicated upon models in which T1IFN signaling was interrupted prior to a primary immune response, raising the possibility that the resulting memory cells might be intrinsically abnormal. We have directly addressed this by using an inducible-Cre model system in which the host remains genetically-intact during the primary response to infection, and in which T1IFN signaling can be effectively ablated prior to secondary viral challenge. We report that, in stark contrast to primary infection, T1IFN signaling is not required during the recall response. IFNαβR-deficient memory CD8(+) and CD4(+) memory T cells undergo attrition and expansion with kinetics that are indistinguishable from those of receptor-sufficient cells. Moreover, even in the absence of functional T1IFN signaling, the host’s immune capacity to rapidly suppress, and then to eradicate, a secondary infection remains intact. Thus, this study shows that T1IFN signaling is dispensable during the recall response to a virus infection. Moreover, two broader implications may be drawn. First, a T cell’s requirement for a cytokine is highly dependent on the cell’s maturation / differentiation status. Consequently, second, these data underscore the importance of evaluating a gene’s impact by modulating its expression or function in a temporally-controllable manner. Public Library of Science 2016-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5006979/ /pubmed/27580079 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1005861 Text en © 2016 Hosking et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hosking, Martin P.
Flynn, Claudia T.
Whitton, J. Lindsay
Type I IFN Signaling Is Dispensable during Secondary Viral Infection
title Type I IFN Signaling Is Dispensable during Secondary Viral Infection
title_full Type I IFN Signaling Is Dispensable during Secondary Viral Infection
title_fullStr Type I IFN Signaling Is Dispensable during Secondary Viral Infection
title_full_unstemmed Type I IFN Signaling Is Dispensable during Secondary Viral Infection
title_short Type I IFN Signaling Is Dispensable during Secondary Viral Infection
title_sort type i ifn signaling is dispensable during secondary viral infection
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5006979/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27580079
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1005861
work_keys_str_mv AT hoskingmartinp typeiifnsignalingisdispensableduringsecondaryviralinfection
AT flynnclaudiat typeiifnsignalingisdispensableduringsecondaryviralinfection
AT whittonjlindsay typeiifnsignalingisdispensableduringsecondaryviralinfection