Cargando…

Clinical re-evaluation of removing blood stasis therapy in treating acute intracerebral hemorrhage safety and efficacy: a protocol for a randomized, controlled, multicenter study (CRRICH Trial)

BACKGROUND: Hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage (HICH) is one of the most devastating forms of stroke. Currently, no specific therapies for HICH except general medical care. However, in China, medicine of promoting blood circulation (PBC) and removing blood stasis (RBS) are widely and efficiently...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zeng, Liling, Guo, Jianwen, Wang, Jing, Zhang, Qixin, Li, Haijun, Lin, Rongming
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5007233/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27652041
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-3136-y
_version_ 1782451172841357312
author Zeng, Liling
Guo, Jianwen
Wang, Jing
Zhang, Qixin
Li, Haijun
Lin, Rongming
author_facet Zeng, Liling
Guo, Jianwen
Wang, Jing
Zhang, Qixin
Li, Haijun
Lin, Rongming
author_sort Zeng, Liling
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage (HICH) is one of the most devastating forms of stroke. Currently, no specific therapies for HICH except general medical care. However, in China, medicine of promoting blood circulation (PBC) and removing blood stasis (RBS) are widely and efficiently used to treat HICH and become a potentially effective treatment for the secondary effects of HICH to alleviate brain injury, accelerate neuronal recovery, and improve the prognosis. In order to evaluate the safety and effect of PBC and RBS herbal drugs, we design a prospective, randomized, open, double-blind controlled clinical trial on the hematoma enlargement in HICH patients treating with PBC and RBS herbal medicine within 6 h time window from the symptom onset. METHODS/DESIGN: A multicenter, three-group, prospective, randomized, double-blinded and placebo-controlled clinical trial. Patients aged 18 or older with HICH confirmed by CT scan within 6 h from the onset are included. 360 patients will be randomized to 3 groups (PBC & RBS & Placebo) within 6 h of ictus. Stratified block randomization is undertaken using a sequentially numbered and opaque envelope. All subjects must take medicine within 6 h of ictus and have another CT scan at about 24 h to confirm hematoma expansion. A postal questionnaire to the patients to evaluate their recorvery at 3 months. Primary outcome is the percent change in the volume of hematoma at 24 h. Secondary outcomes include: mortality, disability, serious adverse events, etc. CONCLUSIONS: The CRRICH Trial is expected to confirm the safety and effect of acute intracerebral hemorrhage treated within 6 h of ictus with “RBS” therapy and to determine whether the traditional therapy can cause hematoma growth after intracerebral hemorrhage. DISCUSSIONS: This is the first  prospective, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial to investigate herbal medicine whether can induce the incidence of hematoma enlargement of AICH patient within the 6 h time window from onset. We need the data to keep the herbal clinical usage safety. Trial registration clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01918722
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5007233
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50072332016-09-20 Clinical re-evaluation of removing blood stasis therapy in treating acute intracerebral hemorrhage safety and efficacy: a protocol for a randomized, controlled, multicenter study (CRRICH Trial) Zeng, Liling Guo, Jianwen Wang, Jing Zhang, Qixin Li, Haijun Lin, Rongming Springerplus Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage (HICH) is one of the most devastating forms of stroke. Currently, no specific therapies for HICH except general medical care. However, in China, medicine of promoting blood circulation (PBC) and removing blood stasis (RBS) are widely and efficiently used to treat HICH and become a potentially effective treatment for the secondary effects of HICH to alleviate brain injury, accelerate neuronal recovery, and improve the prognosis. In order to evaluate the safety and effect of PBC and RBS herbal drugs, we design a prospective, randomized, open, double-blind controlled clinical trial on the hematoma enlargement in HICH patients treating with PBC and RBS herbal medicine within 6 h time window from the symptom onset. METHODS/DESIGN: A multicenter, three-group, prospective, randomized, double-blinded and placebo-controlled clinical trial. Patients aged 18 or older with HICH confirmed by CT scan within 6 h from the onset are included. 360 patients will be randomized to 3 groups (PBC & RBS & Placebo) within 6 h of ictus. Stratified block randomization is undertaken using a sequentially numbered and opaque envelope. All subjects must take medicine within 6 h of ictus and have another CT scan at about 24 h to confirm hematoma expansion. A postal questionnaire to the patients to evaluate their recorvery at 3 months. Primary outcome is the percent change in the volume of hematoma at 24 h. Secondary outcomes include: mortality, disability, serious adverse events, etc. CONCLUSIONS: The CRRICH Trial is expected to confirm the safety and effect of acute intracerebral hemorrhage treated within 6 h of ictus with “RBS” therapy and to determine whether the traditional therapy can cause hematoma growth after intracerebral hemorrhage. DISCUSSIONS: This is the first  prospective, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial to investigate herbal medicine whether can induce the incidence of hematoma enlargement of AICH patient within the 6 h time window from onset. We need the data to keep the herbal clinical usage safety. Trial registration clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01918722 Springer International Publishing 2016-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5007233/ /pubmed/27652041 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-3136-y Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Zeng, Liling
Guo, Jianwen
Wang, Jing
Zhang, Qixin
Li, Haijun
Lin, Rongming
Clinical re-evaluation of removing blood stasis therapy in treating acute intracerebral hemorrhage safety and efficacy: a protocol for a randomized, controlled, multicenter study (CRRICH Trial)
title Clinical re-evaluation of removing blood stasis therapy in treating acute intracerebral hemorrhage safety and efficacy: a protocol for a randomized, controlled, multicenter study (CRRICH Trial)
title_full Clinical re-evaluation of removing blood stasis therapy in treating acute intracerebral hemorrhage safety and efficacy: a protocol for a randomized, controlled, multicenter study (CRRICH Trial)
title_fullStr Clinical re-evaluation of removing blood stasis therapy in treating acute intracerebral hemorrhage safety and efficacy: a protocol for a randomized, controlled, multicenter study (CRRICH Trial)
title_full_unstemmed Clinical re-evaluation of removing blood stasis therapy in treating acute intracerebral hemorrhage safety and efficacy: a protocol for a randomized, controlled, multicenter study (CRRICH Trial)
title_short Clinical re-evaluation of removing blood stasis therapy in treating acute intracerebral hemorrhage safety and efficacy: a protocol for a randomized, controlled, multicenter study (CRRICH Trial)
title_sort clinical re-evaluation of removing blood stasis therapy in treating acute intracerebral hemorrhage safety and efficacy: a protocol for a randomized, controlled, multicenter study (crrich trial)
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5007233/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27652041
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-3136-y
work_keys_str_mv AT zengliling clinicalreevaluationofremovingbloodstasistherapyintreatingacuteintracerebralhemorrhagesafetyandefficacyaprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledmulticenterstudycrrichtrial
AT guojianwen clinicalreevaluationofremovingbloodstasistherapyintreatingacuteintracerebralhemorrhagesafetyandefficacyaprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledmulticenterstudycrrichtrial
AT wangjing clinicalreevaluationofremovingbloodstasistherapyintreatingacuteintracerebralhemorrhagesafetyandefficacyaprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledmulticenterstudycrrichtrial
AT zhangqixin clinicalreevaluationofremovingbloodstasistherapyintreatingacuteintracerebralhemorrhagesafetyandefficacyaprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledmulticenterstudycrrichtrial
AT lihaijun clinicalreevaluationofremovingbloodstasistherapyintreatingacuteintracerebralhemorrhagesafetyandefficacyaprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledmulticenterstudycrrichtrial
AT linrongming clinicalreevaluationofremovingbloodstasistherapyintreatingacuteintracerebralhemorrhagesafetyandefficacyaprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledmulticenterstudycrrichtrial