Cargando…

In the loop: Practices of self-monitoring from accounts by trial participants

Self-monitoring, by which individuals record and appraise ongoing information about the status of their body in order to improve their health, has been a key element in the personal management of conditions such as diabetes, but it is now also increasingly used in relation to health-associated behav...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lynch, Rebecca, Cohn, Simon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5007662/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26466601
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1363459315611939
_version_ 1782451247829221376
author Lynch, Rebecca
Cohn, Simon
author_facet Lynch, Rebecca
Cohn, Simon
author_sort Lynch, Rebecca
collection PubMed
description Self-monitoring, by which individuals record and appraise ongoing information about the status of their body in order to improve their health, has been a key element in the personal management of conditions such as diabetes, but it is now also increasingly used in relation to health-associated behaviours. The introduction of self-monitoring as an intervention to change behaviour is intended to provide feedback that can be used by individuals to both assess their status and provide ongoing support towards a goal that may be formally set or remains implicit. However, little attention has been paid to how individuals actually engage in the process or act upon the information they receive. This article addresses this by exploring how participants in a particular trial (‘Get Moving’) experienced the process and nature of feedback. Although the trial aimed to compare the potential efficacy of three different monitoring activities designed to encourage greater physical activity, participants did not present distinctly different accounts of each intervention and the specifics of the feedback provided. Instead, their accounts took the form of much more extended and personal narratives that included other people and features of the environment. We draw on these broader descriptions to problematise the notion of self-monitoring and conclude that self-monitoring is neither solely about ‘self’ nor is it exclusively about ‘monitoring’. We suggest that a more expansive social and material understanding of feedback can give insight into the ways information is made active and meaningful for individuals in their everyday contexts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5007662
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50076622016-09-09 In the loop: Practices of self-monitoring from accounts by trial participants Lynch, Rebecca Cohn, Simon Health (London) Articles Self-monitoring, by which individuals record and appraise ongoing information about the status of their body in order to improve their health, has been a key element in the personal management of conditions such as diabetes, but it is now also increasingly used in relation to health-associated behaviours. The introduction of self-monitoring as an intervention to change behaviour is intended to provide feedback that can be used by individuals to both assess their status and provide ongoing support towards a goal that may be formally set or remains implicit. However, little attention has been paid to how individuals actually engage in the process or act upon the information they receive. This article addresses this by exploring how participants in a particular trial (‘Get Moving’) experienced the process and nature of feedback. Although the trial aimed to compare the potential efficacy of three different monitoring activities designed to encourage greater physical activity, participants did not present distinctly different accounts of each intervention and the specifics of the feedback provided. Instead, their accounts took the form of much more extended and personal narratives that included other people and features of the environment. We draw on these broader descriptions to problematise the notion of self-monitoring and conclude that self-monitoring is neither solely about ‘self’ nor is it exclusively about ‘monitoring’. We suggest that a more expansive social and material understanding of feedback can give insight into the ways information is made active and meaningful for individuals in their everyday contexts. SAGE Publications 2015-10-13 2016-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5007662/ /pubmed/26466601 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1363459315611939 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Articles
Lynch, Rebecca
Cohn, Simon
In the loop: Practices of self-monitoring from accounts by trial participants
title In the loop: Practices of self-monitoring from accounts by trial participants
title_full In the loop: Practices of self-monitoring from accounts by trial participants
title_fullStr In the loop: Practices of self-monitoring from accounts by trial participants
title_full_unstemmed In the loop: Practices of self-monitoring from accounts by trial participants
title_short In the loop: Practices of self-monitoring from accounts by trial participants
title_sort in the loop: practices of self-monitoring from accounts by trial participants
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5007662/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26466601
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1363459315611939
work_keys_str_mv AT lynchrebecca inthelooppracticesofselfmonitoringfromaccountsbytrialparticipants
AT cohnsimon inthelooppracticesofselfmonitoringfromaccountsbytrialparticipants