Cargando…

Safety and efficacy of vismodegib in patients with basal cell carcinoma nevus syndrome: pooled analysis of two trials

BACKGROUND: Aberrant activation of the Hedgehog (Hh) pathway is a key driver in the pathogenesis of basal cell carcinomas (BCCs), including patients with BCC nevus syndrome (BCCNS). It is unclear whether BCCs arising in patients with BCCNS respond differently to vismodegib than in patients without B...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chang, Anne Lynn S., Arron, Sarah T., Migden, Michael R., Solomon, James A., Yoo, Simon, Day, Bann-Mo, McKenna, Edward F., Sekulic, Aleksandar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5007799/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27581207
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13023-016-0506-z
_version_ 1782451269060788224
author Chang, Anne Lynn S.
Arron, Sarah T.
Migden, Michael R.
Solomon, James A.
Yoo, Simon
Day, Bann-Mo
McKenna, Edward F.
Sekulic, Aleksandar
author_facet Chang, Anne Lynn S.
Arron, Sarah T.
Migden, Michael R.
Solomon, James A.
Yoo, Simon
Day, Bann-Mo
McKenna, Edward F.
Sekulic, Aleksandar
author_sort Chang, Anne Lynn S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Aberrant activation of the Hedgehog (Hh) pathway is a key driver in the pathogenesis of basal cell carcinomas (BCCs), including patients with BCC nevus syndrome (BCCNS). It is unclear whether BCCs arising in patients with BCCNS respond differently to vismodegib than in patients without BCCNS. We examined the best overall response rate (BORR) and adverse events (AEs) of vismodegib in patients with advanced BCC (aBCC) with and without BCCNS. METHODS: Patients were treated with vismodegib 150 mg/day in the ERIVANCE BCC trial (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00833417) and the expanded access study (EAS; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01160250). BCCNS diagnosis was based on medical history at the time of enrollment. Metastatic BCC response was evaluated using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors, version 1.0 (RECIST v1.0) in both studies. Locally advanced BCC was evaluated by a novel composite end point in ERIVANCE BCC and by RECIST v1.0 in the EAS. Response assessments were performed every 8 weeks in ERIVANCE BCC and every 8–16 weeks in the EAS. Safety assessments (National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 3.0) were performed monthly in both trials. Because of described differences in response assessment/schedule, patients with BCCNS were not pooled across trials. Analytic cohorts for BCCNS and sporadic aBCC were created within each trial for comparison using descriptive statistical methods. RESULTS: Forty-one patients with BCCNS were included in the study: 22 from ERIVANCE BCC and 19 from the EAS. Investigator-assessed BORR in BCCNS groups ranged from 31 to 81 % in patients with locally advanced BCC (n = 33) and was 50 % in patients with metastatic BCC (n = 6). These results were comparable with the non-BCCNS groups. Incidence and severity of AEs were also comparable between the BCCNS and non-BCCNS groups. Amenorrhea was observed in both patient cohorts and was reversible in two patients who discontinued treatment. CONCLUSION: Vismodegib demonstrated comparable efficacy and safety against aBCC in patients with and without BCCNS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5007799
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50077992016-09-02 Safety and efficacy of vismodegib in patients with basal cell carcinoma nevus syndrome: pooled analysis of two trials Chang, Anne Lynn S. Arron, Sarah T. Migden, Michael R. Solomon, James A. Yoo, Simon Day, Bann-Mo McKenna, Edward F. Sekulic, Aleksandar Orphanet J Rare Dis Research BACKGROUND: Aberrant activation of the Hedgehog (Hh) pathway is a key driver in the pathogenesis of basal cell carcinomas (BCCs), including patients with BCC nevus syndrome (BCCNS). It is unclear whether BCCs arising in patients with BCCNS respond differently to vismodegib than in patients without BCCNS. We examined the best overall response rate (BORR) and adverse events (AEs) of vismodegib in patients with advanced BCC (aBCC) with and without BCCNS. METHODS: Patients were treated with vismodegib 150 mg/day in the ERIVANCE BCC trial (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00833417) and the expanded access study (EAS; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01160250). BCCNS diagnosis was based on medical history at the time of enrollment. Metastatic BCC response was evaluated using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors, version 1.0 (RECIST v1.0) in both studies. Locally advanced BCC was evaluated by a novel composite end point in ERIVANCE BCC and by RECIST v1.0 in the EAS. Response assessments were performed every 8 weeks in ERIVANCE BCC and every 8–16 weeks in the EAS. Safety assessments (National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 3.0) were performed monthly in both trials. Because of described differences in response assessment/schedule, patients with BCCNS were not pooled across trials. Analytic cohorts for BCCNS and sporadic aBCC were created within each trial for comparison using descriptive statistical methods. RESULTS: Forty-one patients with BCCNS were included in the study: 22 from ERIVANCE BCC and 19 from the EAS. Investigator-assessed BORR in BCCNS groups ranged from 31 to 81 % in patients with locally advanced BCC (n = 33) and was 50 % in patients with metastatic BCC (n = 6). These results were comparable with the non-BCCNS groups. Incidence and severity of AEs were also comparable between the BCCNS and non-BCCNS groups. Amenorrhea was observed in both patient cohorts and was reversible in two patients who discontinued treatment. CONCLUSION: Vismodegib demonstrated comparable efficacy and safety against aBCC in patients with and without BCCNS. BioMed Central 2016-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5007799/ /pubmed/27581207 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13023-016-0506-z Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Chang, Anne Lynn S.
Arron, Sarah T.
Migden, Michael R.
Solomon, James A.
Yoo, Simon
Day, Bann-Mo
McKenna, Edward F.
Sekulic, Aleksandar
Safety and efficacy of vismodegib in patients with basal cell carcinoma nevus syndrome: pooled analysis of two trials
title Safety and efficacy of vismodegib in patients with basal cell carcinoma nevus syndrome: pooled analysis of two trials
title_full Safety and efficacy of vismodegib in patients with basal cell carcinoma nevus syndrome: pooled analysis of two trials
title_fullStr Safety and efficacy of vismodegib in patients with basal cell carcinoma nevus syndrome: pooled analysis of two trials
title_full_unstemmed Safety and efficacy of vismodegib in patients with basal cell carcinoma nevus syndrome: pooled analysis of two trials
title_short Safety and efficacy of vismodegib in patients with basal cell carcinoma nevus syndrome: pooled analysis of two trials
title_sort safety and efficacy of vismodegib in patients with basal cell carcinoma nevus syndrome: pooled analysis of two trials
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5007799/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27581207
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13023-016-0506-z
work_keys_str_mv AT changannelynns safetyandefficacyofvismodegibinpatientswithbasalcellcarcinomanevussyndromepooledanalysisoftwotrials
AT arronsaraht safetyandefficacyofvismodegibinpatientswithbasalcellcarcinomanevussyndromepooledanalysisoftwotrials
AT migdenmichaelr safetyandefficacyofvismodegibinpatientswithbasalcellcarcinomanevussyndromepooledanalysisoftwotrials
AT solomonjamesa safetyandefficacyofvismodegibinpatientswithbasalcellcarcinomanevussyndromepooledanalysisoftwotrials
AT yoosimon safetyandefficacyofvismodegibinpatientswithbasalcellcarcinomanevussyndromepooledanalysisoftwotrials
AT daybannmo safetyandefficacyofvismodegibinpatientswithbasalcellcarcinomanevussyndromepooledanalysisoftwotrials
AT mckennaedwardf safetyandefficacyofvismodegibinpatientswithbasalcellcarcinomanevussyndromepooledanalysisoftwotrials
AT sekulicaleksandar safetyandefficacyofvismodegibinpatientswithbasalcellcarcinomanevussyndromepooledanalysisoftwotrials