Cargando…
Cost-effectiveness analysis of left atrial appendage occlusion compared with pharmacological strategies for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation
BACKGROUND: Transcatheter left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is a promising therapy for stroke prophylaxis in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) but its cost-effectiveness remains understudied. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of LAAO for stroke prophylaxis in NVAF. METHODS: A Ma...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5007846/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27581874 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-016-0351-y |
_version_ | 1782451279841198080 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Vivian Wing-Yan Tsai, Ronald Bing-Ching Chow, Ines Hang-Iao Yan, Bryan Ping-Yen Kaya, Mehmet Gungor Park, Jai-Wun Lam, Yat-Yin |
author_facet | Lee, Vivian Wing-Yan Tsai, Ronald Bing-Ching Chow, Ines Hang-Iao Yan, Bryan Ping-Yen Kaya, Mehmet Gungor Park, Jai-Wun Lam, Yat-Yin |
author_sort | Lee, Vivian Wing-Yan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Transcatheter left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is a promising therapy for stroke prophylaxis in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) but its cost-effectiveness remains understudied. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of LAAO for stroke prophylaxis in NVAF. METHODS: A Markov decision analytic model was used to compare the cost-effectiveness of LAAO with 7 pharmacological strategies: aspirin alone, clopidogrel plus aspirin, warfarin, dabigatran 110 mg, dabigatran 150 mg, apixaban, and rivaroxaban. Outcome measures included quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), lifetime costs and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). Base-case data were derived from ACTIVE, RE-LY, ARISTOTLE, ROCKET-AF, PROTECT-AF and PREVAIL trials. One-way sensitivity analysis varied by CHADS(2) score, HAS-BLED score, time horizons, and LAAO costs; and probabilistic sensitivity analysis using 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations was conducted to assess parameter uncertainty. RESULTS: LAAO was considered cost-effective compared with aspirin, clopidogrel plus aspirin, and warfarin, with ICER of US$5,115, $2,447, and $6,298 per QALY gained, respectively. LAAO was dominant (i.e. less costly but more effective) compared to other strategies. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated favorable ICERs of LAAO against other strategies in varied CHADS(2) score, HAS-BLED score, time horizons (5 to 15 years) and LAAO costs. LAAO was cost-effective in 86.24 % of 10,000 simulations using a threshold of US$50,000/QALY. CONCLUSIONS: Transcatheter LAAO is cost-effective for prevention of stroke in NVAF compared with 7 pharmacological strategies. CONDENSED ABSTRACT: The transcatheter left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is considered cost-effective against the standard 7 oral pharmacological strategies including acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) alone, clopidogrel plus ASA, warfarin, dabigatran 110 mg, dabigatran 150 mg, apixaban, and rivaroxaban for stroke prophylaxis in non-valvular atrial fibrillation management. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5007846 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50078462016-09-02 Cost-effectiveness analysis of left atrial appendage occlusion compared with pharmacological strategies for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation Lee, Vivian Wing-Yan Tsai, Ronald Bing-Ching Chow, Ines Hang-Iao Yan, Bryan Ping-Yen Kaya, Mehmet Gungor Park, Jai-Wun Lam, Yat-Yin BMC Cardiovasc Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Transcatheter left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is a promising therapy for stroke prophylaxis in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) but its cost-effectiveness remains understudied. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of LAAO for stroke prophylaxis in NVAF. METHODS: A Markov decision analytic model was used to compare the cost-effectiveness of LAAO with 7 pharmacological strategies: aspirin alone, clopidogrel plus aspirin, warfarin, dabigatran 110 mg, dabigatran 150 mg, apixaban, and rivaroxaban. Outcome measures included quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), lifetime costs and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). Base-case data were derived from ACTIVE, RE-LY, ARISTOTLE, ROCKET-AF, PROTECT-AF and PREVAIL trials. One-way sensitivity analysis varied by CHADS(2) score, HAS-BLED score, time horizons, and LAAO costs; and probabilistic sensitivity analysis using 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations was conducted to assess parameter uncertainty. RESULTS: LAAO was considered cost-effective compared with aspirin, clopidogrel plus aspirin, and warfarin, with ICER of US$5,115, $2,447, and $6,298 per QALY gained, respectively. LAAO was dominant (i.e. less costly but more effective) compared to other strategies. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated favorable ICERs of LAAO against other strategies in varied CHADS(2) score, HAS-BLED score, time horizons (5 to 15 years) and LAAO costs. LAAO was cost-effective in 86.24 % of 10,000 simulations using a threshold of US$50,000/QALY. CONCLUSIONS: Transcatheter LAAO is cost-effective for prevention of stroke in NVAF compared with 7 pharmacological strategies. CONDENSED ABSTRACT: The transcatheter left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is considered cost-effective against the standard 7 oral pharmacological strategies including acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) alone, clopidogrel plus ASA, warfarin, dabigatran 110 mg, dabigatran 150 mg, apixaban, and rivaroxaban for stroke prophylaxis in non-valvular atrial fibrillation management. BioMed Central 2016-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5007846/ /pubmed/27581874 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-016-0351-y Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lee, Vivian Wing-Yan Tsai, Ronald Bing-Ching Chow, Ines Hang-Iao Yan, Bryan Ping-Yen Kaya, Mehmet Gungor Park, Jai-Wun Lam, Yat-Yin Cost-effectiveness analysis of left atrial appendage occlusion compared with pharmacological strategies for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation |
title | Cost-effectiveness analysis of left atrial appendage occlusion compared with pharmacological strategies for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation |
title_full | Cost-effectiveness analysis of left atrial appendage occlusion compared with pharmacological strategies for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation |
title_fullStr | Cost-effectiveness analysis of left atrial appendage occlusion compared with pharmacological strategies for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation |
title_full_unstemmed | Cost-effectiveness analysis of left atrial appendage occlusion compared with pharmacological strategies for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation |
title_short | Cost-effectiveness analysis of left atrial appendage occlusion compared with pharmacological strategies for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation |
title_sort | cost-effectiveness analysis of left atrial appendage occlusion compared with pharmacological strategies for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5007846/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27581874 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-016-0351-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leevivianwingyan costeffectivenessanalysisofleftatrialappendageocclusioncomparedwithpharmacologicalstrategiesforstrokepreventioninatrialfibrillation AT tsaironaldbingching costeffectivenessanalysisofleftatrialappendageocclusioncomparedwithpharmacologicalstrategiesforstrokepreventioninatrialfibrillation AT chowineshangiao costeffectivenessanalysisofleftatrialappendageocclusioncomparedwithpharmacologicalstrategiesforstrokepreventioninatrialfibrillation AT yanbryanpingyen costeffectivenessanalysisofleftatrialappendageocclusioncomparedwithpharmacologicalstrategiesforstrokepreventioninatrialfibrillation AT kayamehmetgungor costeffectivenessanalysisofleftatrialappendageocclusioncomparedwithpharmacologicalstrategiesforstrokepreventioninatrialfibrillation AT parkjaiwun costeffectivenessanalysisofleftatrialappendageocclusioncomparedwithpharmacologicalstrategiesforstrokepreventioninatrialfibrillation AT lamyatyin costeffectivenessanalysisofleftatrialappendageocclusioncomparedwithpharmacologicalstrategiesforstrokepreventioninatrialfibrillation |