Cargando…

Cost-effectiveness analysis of left atrial appendage occlusion compared with pharmacological strategies for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is a promising therapy for stroke prophylaxis in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) but its cost-effectiveness remains understudied. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of LAAO for stroke prophylaxis in NVAF. METHODS: A Ma...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Vivian Wing-Yan, Tsai, Ronald Bing-Ching, Chow, Ines Hang-Iao, Yan, Bryan Ping-Yen, Kaya, Mehmet Gungor, Park, Jai-Wun, Lam, Yat-Yin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5007846/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27581874
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-016-0351-y
_version_ 1782451279841198080
author Lee, Vivian Wing-Yan
Tsai, Ronald Bing-Ching
Chow, Ines Hang-Iao
Yan, Bryan Ping-Yen
Kaya, Mehmet Gungor
Park, Jai-Wun
Lam, Yat-Yin
author_facet Lee, Vivian Wing-Yan
Tsai, Ronald Bing-Ching
Chow, Ines Hang-Iao
Yan, Bryan Ping-Yen
Kaya, Mehmet Gungor
Park, Jai-Wun
Lam, Yat-Yin
author_sort Lee, Vivian Wing-Yan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Transcatheter left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is a promising therapy for stroke prophylaxis in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) but its cost-effectiveness remains understudied. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of LAAO for stroke prophylaxis in NVAF. METHODS: A Markov decision analytic model was used to compare the cost-effectiveness of LAAO with 7 pharmacological strategies: aspirin alone, clopidogrel plus aspirin, warfarin, dabigatran 110 mg, dabigatran 150 mg, apixaban, and rivaroxaban. Outcome measures included quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), lifetime costs and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). Base-case data were derived from ACTIVE, RE-LY, ARISTOTLE, ROCKET-AF, PROTECT-AF and PREVAIL trials. One-way sensitivity analysis varied by CHADS(2) score, HAS-BLED score, time horizons, and LAAO costs; and probabilistic sensitivity analysis using 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations was conducted to assess parameter uncertainty. RESULTS: LAAO was considered cost-effective compared with aspirin, clopidogrel plus aspirin, and warfarin, with ICER of US$5,115, $2,447, and $6,298 per QALY gained, respectively. LAAO was dominant (i.e. less costly but more effective) compared to other strategies. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated favorable ICERs of LAAO against other strategies in varied CHADS(2) score, HAS-BLED score, time horizons (5 to 15 years) and LAAO costs. LAAO was cost-effective in 86.24 % of 10,000 simulations using a threshold of US$50,000/QALY. CONCLUSIONS: Transcatheter LAAO is cost-effective for prevention of stroke in NVAF compared with 7 pharmacological strategies. CONDENSED ABSTRACT: The transcatheter left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is considered cost-effective against the standard 7 oral pharmacological strategies including acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) alone, clopidogrel plus ASA, warfarin, dabigatran 110 mg, dabigatran 150 mg, apixaban, and rivaroxaban for stroke prophylaxis in non-valvular atrial fibrillation management.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5007846
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50078462016-09-02 Cost-effectiveness analysis of left atrial appendage occlusion compared with pharmacological strategies for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation Lee, Vivian Wing-Yan Tsai, Ronald Bing-Ching Chow, Ines Hang-Iao Yan, Bryan Ping-Yen Kaya, Mehmet Gungor Park, Jai-Wun Lam, Yat-Yin BMC Cardiovasc Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Transcatheter left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is a promising therapy for stroke prophylaxis in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) but its cost-effectiveness remains understudied. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of LAAO for stroke prophylaxis in NVAF. METHODS: A Markov decision analytic model was used to compare the cost-effectiveness of LAAO with 7 pharmacological strategies: aspirin alone, clopidogrel plus aspirin, warfarin, dabigatran 110 mg, dabigatran 150 mg, apixaban, and rivaroxaban. Outcome measures included quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), lifetime costs and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). Base-case data were derived from ACTIVE, RE-LY, ARISTOTLE, ROCKET-AF, PROTECT-AF and PREVAIL trials. One-way sensitivity analysis varied by CHADS(2) score, HAS-BLED score, time horizons, and LAAO costs; and probabilistic sensitivity analysis using 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations was conducted to assess parameter uncertainty. RESULTS: LAAO was considered cost-effective compared with aspirin, clopidogrel plus aspirin, and warfarin, with ICER of US$5,115, $2,447, and $6,298 per QALY gained, respectively. LAAO was dominant (i.e. less costly but more effective) compared to other strategies. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated favorable ICERs of LAAO against other strategies in varied CHADS(2) score, HAS-BLED score, time horizons (5 to 15 years) and LAAO costs. LAAO was cost-effective in 86.24 % of 10,000 simulations using a threshold of US$50,000/QALY. CONCLUSIONS: Transcatheter LAAO is cost-effective for prevention of stroke in NVAF compared with 7 pharmacological strategies. CONDENSED ABSTRACT: The transcatheter left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is considered cost-effective against the standard 7 oral pharmacological strategies including acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) alone, clopidogrel plus ASA, warfarin, dabigatran 110 mg, dabigatran 150 mg, apixaban, and rivaroxaban for stroke prophylaxis in non-valvular atrial fibrillation management. BioMed Central 2016-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5007846/ /pubmed/27581874 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-016-0351-y Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lee, Vivian Wing-Yan
Tsai, Ronald Bing-Ching
Chow, Ines Hang-Iao
Yan, Bryan Ping-Yen
Kaya, Mehmet Gungor
Park, Jai-Wun
Lam, Yat-Yin
Cost-effectiveness analysis of left atrial appendage occlusion compared with pharmacological strategies for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation
title Cost-effectiveness analysis of left atrial appendage occlusion compared with pharmacological strategies for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation
title_full Cost-effectiveness analysis of left atrial appendage occlusion compared with pharmacological strategies for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness analysis of left atrial appendage occlusion compared with pharmacological strategies for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness analysis of left atrial appendage occlusion compared with pharmacological strategies for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation
title_short Cost-effectiveness analysis of left atrial appendage occlusion compared with pharmacological strategies for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation
title_sort cost-effectiveness analysis of left atrial appendage occlusion compared with pharmacological strategies for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5007846/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27581874
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-016-0351-y
work_keys_str_mv AT leevivianwingyan costeffectivenessanalysisofleftatrialappendageocclusioncomparedwithpharmacologicalstrategiesforstrokepreventioninatrialfibrillation
AT tsaironaldbingching costeffectivenessanalysisofleftatrialappendageocclusioncomparedwithpharmacologicalstrategiesforstrokepreventioninatrialfibrillation
AT chowineshangiao costeffectivenessanalysisofleftatrialappendageocclusioncomparedwithpharmacologicalstrategiesforstrokepreventioninatrialfibrillation
AT yanbryanpingyen costeffectivenessanalysisofleftatrialappendageocclusioncomparedwithpharmacologicalstrategiesforstrokepreventioninatrialfibrillation
AT kayamehmetgungor costeffectivenessanalysisofleftatrialappendageocclusioncomparedwithpharmacologicalstrategiesforstrokepreventioninatrialfibrillation
AT parkjaiwun costeffectivenessanalysisofleftatrialappendageocclusioncomparedwithpharmacologicalstrategiesforstrokepreventioninatrialfibrillation
AT lamyatyin costeffectivenessanalysisofleftatrialappendageocclusioncomparedwithpharmacologicalstrategiesforstrokepreventioninatrialfibrillation