Cargando…

Assessing the similarity of mental models of operating room team members and implications for patient safety: a prospective, replicated study

BACKGROUND: Patient safety depends on effective teamwork. The similarity of team members’ mental models - or their shared understanding–regarding clinical tasks is likely to influence the effectiveness of teamwork. Mental models have not been measured in the complex, high-acuity environment of the o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nakarada-Kordic, Ivana, Weller, Jennifer M., Webster, Craig S., Cumin, David, Frampton, Christopher, Boyd, Matt, Merry, Alan F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5007868/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27581377
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0752-8
_version_ 1782451283780698112
author Nakarada-Kordic, Ivana
Weller, Jennifer M.
Webster, Craig S.
Cumin, David
Frampton, Christopher
Boyd, Matt
Merry, Alan F.
author_facet Nakarada-Kordic, Ivana
Weller, Jennifer M.
Webster, Craig S.
Cumin, David
Frampton, Christopher
Boyd, Matt
Merry, Alan F.
author_sort Nakarada-Kordic, Ivana
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patient safety depends on effective teamwork. The similarity of team members’ mental models - or their shared understanding–regarding clinical tasks is likely to influence the effectiveness of teamwork. Mental models have not been measured in the complex, high-acuity environment of the operating room (OR), where professionals of different backgrounds must work together to achieve the best surgical outcome for each patient. Therefore, we aimed to explore the similarity of mental models of task sequence and of responsibility for task within multidisciplinary OR teams. METHODS: We developed a computer-based card sorting tool (Momento) to capture the information on mental models in 20 six-person surgical teams, each comprised of three subteams (anaesthesia, surgery, and nursing) for two simulated laparotomies. Team members sorted 20 cards depicting key tasks according to when in the procedure each task should be performed, and which subteam was primarily responsible for each task. Within each OR team and subteam, we conducted pairwise comparisons of scores to arrive at mean similarity scores for each task. RESULTS: Mean similarity score for task sequence was 87 % (range 57–97 %). Mean score for responsibility for task was 70 % (range = 38–100 %), but for half of the tasks was only 51 % (range = 38–69 %). Participants believed their own subteam was primarily responsible for approximately half the tasks in each procedure. CONCLUSIONS: We found differences in the mental models of some OR team members about responsibility for and order of certain tasks in an emergency laparotomy. Momento is a tool that could help elucidate and better align the mental models of OR team members about surgical procedures and thereby improve teamwork and outcomes for patients. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12909-016-0752-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5007868
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50078682016-09-02 Assessing the similarity of mental models of operating room team members and implications for patient safety: a prospective, replicated study Nakarada-Kordic, Ivana Weller, Jennifer M. Webster, Craig S. Cumin, David Frampton, Christopher Boyd, Matt Merry, Alan F. BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Patient safety depends on effective teamwork. The similarity of team members’ mental models - or their shared understanding–regarding clinical tasks is likely to influence the effectiveness of teamwork. Mental models have not been measured in the complex, high-acuity environment of the operating room (OR), where professionals of different backgrounds must work together to achieve the best surgical outcome for each patient. Therefore, we aimed to explore the similarity of mental models of task sequence and of responsibility for task within multidisciplinary OR teams. METHODS: We developed a computer-based card sorting tool (Momento) to capture the information on mental models in 20 six-person surgical teams, each comprised of three subteams (anaesthesia, surgery, and nursing) for two simulated laparotomies. Team members sorted 20 cards depicting key tasks according to when in the procedure each task should be performed, and which subteam was primarily responsible for each task. Within each OR team and subteam, we conducted pairwise comparisons of scores to arrive at mean similarity scores for each task. RESULTS: Mean similarity score for task sequence was 87 % (range 57–97 %). Mean score for responsibility for task was 70 % (range = 38–100 %), but for half of the tasks was only 51 % (range = 38–69 %). Participants believed their own subteam was primarily responsible for approximately half the tasks in each procedure. CONCLUSIONS: We found differences in the mental models of some OR team members about responsibility for and order of certain tasks in an emergency laparotomy. Momento is a tool that could help elucidate and better align the mental models of OR team members about surgical procedures and thereby improve teamwork and outcomes for patients. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12909-016-0752-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5007868/ /pubmed/27581377 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0752-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Nakarada-Kordic, Ivana
Weller, Jennifer M.
Webster, Craig S.
Cumin, David
Frampton, Christopher
Boyd, Matt
Merry, Alan F.
Assessing the similarity of mental models of operating room team members and implications for patient safety: a prospective, replicated study
title Assessing the similarity of mental models of operating room team members and implications for patient safety: a prospective, replicated study
title_full Assessing the similarity of mental models of operating room team members and implications for patient safety: a prospective, replicated study
title_fullStr Assessing the similarity of mental models of operating room team members and implications for patient safety: a prospective, replicated study
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the similarity of mental models of operating room team members and implications for patient safety: a prospective, replicated study
title_short Assessing the similarity of mental models of operating room team members and implications for patient safety: a prospective, replicated study
title_sort assessing the similarity of mental models of operating room team members and implications for patient safety: a prospective, replicated study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5007868/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27581377
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0752-8
work_keys_str_mv AT nakaradakordicivana assessingthesimilarityofmentalmodelsofoperatingroomteammembersandimplicationsforpatientsafetyaprospectivereplicatedstudy
AT wellerjenniferm assessingthesimilarityofmentalmodelsofoperatingroomteammembersandimplicationsforpatientsafetyaprospectivereplicatedstudy
AT webstercraigs assessingthesimilarityofmentalmodelsofoperatingroomteammembersandimplicationsforpatientsafetyaprospectivereplicatedstudy
AT cumindavid assessingthesimilarityofmentalmodelsofoperatingroomteammembersandimplicationsforpatientsafetyaprospectivereplicatedstudy
AT framptonchristopher assessingthesimilarityofmentalmodelsofoperatingroomteammembersandimplicationsforpatientsafetyaprospectivereplicatedstudy
AT boydmatt assessingthesimilarityofmentalmodelsofoperatingroomteammembersandimplicationsforpatientsafetyaprospectivereplicatedstudy
AT merryalanf assessingthesimilarityofmentalmodelsofoperatingroomteammembersandimplicationsforpatientsafetyaprospectivereplicatedstudy