Cargando…

High Performance Field Emitters

The field electron emission performance of bulk, 1D, and 2D nanomaterials is here empirically compared in the largest metal‐analysis of its type. No clear trends are noted between the turn‐on electric field and maximum current density as a function of emitter work function, while a more pronounced c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Collins, Clare M., Parmee, Richard J., Milne, William I., Cole, Matthew T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5008108/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27610335
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/advs.201500318
_version_ 1782451314702155776
author Collins, Clare M.
Parmee, Richard J.
Milne, William I.
Cole, Matthew T.
author_facet Collins, Clare M.
Parmee, Richard J.
Milne, William I.
Cole, Matthew T.
author_sort Collins, Clare M.
collection PubMed
description The field electron emission performance of bulk, 1D, and 2D nanomaterials is here empirically compared in the largest metal‐analysis of its type. No clear trends are noted between the turn‐on electric field and maximum current density as a function of emitter work function, while a more pronounced correlation with the emitters dimensionality is noted. The turn‐on field is found to be twice as large for bulk materials compared to 1D and 2D materials, empirically confirming the wider communities view that high aspect ratios, and highly perturbed surface morphologies allow for enhanced field electron emitters. [Image: see text]
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5008108
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50081082016-09-06 High Performance Field Emitters Collins, Clare M. Parmee, Richard J. Milne, William I. Cole, Matthew T. Adv Sci (Weinh) Communications The field electron emission performance of bulk, 1D, and 2D nanomaterials is here empirically compared in the largest metal‐analysis of its type. No clear trends are noted between the turn‐on electric field and maximum current density as a function of emitter work function, while a more pronounced correlation with the emitters dimensionality is noted. The turn‐on field is found to be twice as large for bulk materials compared to 1D and 2D materials, empirically confirming the wider communities view that high aspect ratios, and highly perturbed surface morphologies allow for enhanced field electron emitters. [Image: see text] John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5008108/ /pubmed/27610335 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/advs.201500318 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Published by WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Communications
Collins, Clare M.
Parmee, Richard J.
Milne, William I.
Cole, Matthew T.
High Performance Field Emitters
title High Performance Field Emitters
title_full High Performance Field Emitters
title_fullStr High Performance Field Emitters
title_full_unstemmed High Performance Field Emitters
title_short High Performance Field Emitters
title_sort high performance field emitters
topic Communications
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5008108/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27610335
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/advs.201500318
work_keys_str_mv AT collinsclarem highperformancefieldemitters
AT parmeerichardj highperformancefieldemitters
AT milnewilliami highperformancefieldemitters
AT colematthewt highperformancefieldemitters