Cargando…
Is the increased risk of preterm birth following excision for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia restricted to the first birth post treatment?
OBJECTIVE: To explore whether the increased risk of preterm birth following treatment for cervical disease is limited to the first birth following colposcopy. DESIGN: Nested case–control study. SETTING: Twelve NHS hospitals in England. POPULATION: All nonmultiple births from women selected as cases...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5008142/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25854594 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.13398 |
_version_ | 1782451321323913216 |
---|---|
author | Castañon, A Landy, R Brocklehurst, P Evans, H Peebles, D Singh, N Walker, P Patnick, J Sasieni, P |
author_facet | Castañon, A Landy, R Brocklehurst, P Evans, H Peebles, D Singh, N Walker, P Patnick, J Sasieni, P |
author_sort | Castañon, A |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To explore whether the increased risk of preterm birth following treatment for cervical disease is limited to the first birth following colposcopy. DESIGN: Nested case–control study. SETTING: Twelve NHS hospitals in England. POPULATION: All nonmultiple births from women selected as cases or controls from a cohort of women with both colposcopy and a hospital birth. Cases had a preterm (20–36 weeks of gestation) birth. Controls had a term birth (38–42 weeks) and no preterm. METHODS: Obstetric, colposcopy and pathology details were obtained. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Adjusted odds ratio of preterm birth in first and second or subsequent births following treatment for cervical disease. RESULTS: A total of 2798 births (1021 preterm) from 2001 women were included in the analysis. The risk of preterm birth increased with increasing depth of treatment among first births post treatment [trend per category increase in depth, categories <10 mm, 10–14 mm, 15–19 mm, ≥20 mm: odds ratio (OR) 1.23, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.12–1.36, P < 0.001] and among second and subsequent births post treatment (trend OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.15–1.56, P < 0.001). No trend was observed among births before colposcopy (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.83–1.16, P = 0.855). The absolute risk of a preterm birth following deep treatments (≥15 mm) was 6.5% among births before colposcopy, 18.9% among first births and 17.2% among second and subsequent births post treatment. Risk of preterm birth (once depth was accounted for) did not differ when comparing first births post colposcopy with second and subsequent births post colposcopy (adjusted OR 1.15, 95% CI 0.89–1.49). CONCLUSIONS: The increased risk of preterm birth following treatment for cervical disease is not restricted to the first birth post colposcopy; it remains for second and subsequent births. These results suggest that once a woman has a deep treatment she remains at higher risk of a preterm birth throughout her reproductive life. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Risk of preterm birth following large treatments for cervical disease remains for second and subsequent births. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5008142 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50081422016-09-16 Is the increased risk of preterm birth following excision for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia restricted to the first birth post treatment? Castañon, A Landy, R Brocklehurst, P Evans, H Peebles, D Singh, N Walker, P Patnick, J Sasieni, P BJOG General Obstetrics OBJECTIVE: To explore whether the increased risk of preterm birth following treatment for cervical disease is limited to the first birth following colposcopy. DESIGN: Nested case–control study. SETTING: Twelve NHS hospitals in England. POPULATION: All nonmultiple births from women selected as cases or controls from a cohort of women with both colposcopy and a hospital birth. Cases had a preterm (20–36 weeks of gestation) birth. Controls had a term birth (38–42 weeks) and no preterm. METHODS: Obstetric, colposcopy and pathology details were obtained. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Adjusted odds ratio of preterm birth in first and second or subsequent births following treatment for cervical disease. RESULTS: A total of 2798 births (1021 preterm) from 2001 women were included in the analysis. The risk of preterm birth increased with increasing depth of treatment among first births post treatment [trend per category increase in depth, categories <10 mm, 10–14 mm, 15–19 mm, ≥20 mm: odds ratio (OR) 1.23, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.12–1.36, P < 0.001] and among second and subsequent births post treatment (trend OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.15–1.56, P < 0.001). No trend was observed among births before colposcopy (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.83–1.16, P = 0.855). The absolute risk of a preterm birth following deep treatments (≥15 mm) was 6.5% among births before colposcopy, 18.9% among first births and 17.2% among second and subsequent births post treatment. Risk of preterm birth (once depth was accounted for) did not differ when comparing first births post colposcopy with second and subsequent births post colposcopy (adjusted OR 1.15, 95% CI 0.89–1.49). CONCLUSIONS: The increased risk of preterm birth following treatment for cervical disease is not restricted to the first birth post colposcopy; it remains for second and subsequent births. These results suggest that once a woman has a deep treatment she remains at higher risk of a preterm birth throughout her reproductive life. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Risk of preterm birth following large treatments for cervical disease remains for second and subsequent births. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-08 2015-04-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5008142/ /pubmed/25854594 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.13398 Text en © 2015 The Authors. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | General Obstetrics Castañon, A Landy, R Brocklehurst, P Evans, H Peebles, D Singh, N Walker, P Patnick, J Sasieni, P Is the increased risk of preterm birth following excision for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia restricted to the first birth post treatment? |
title | Is the increased risk of preterm birth following excision for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia restricted to the first birth post treatment? |
title_full | Is the increased risk of preterm birth following excision for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia restricted to the first birth post treatment? |
title_fullStr | Is the increased risk of preterm birth following excision for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia restricted to the first birth post treatment? |
title_full_unstemmed | Is the increased risk of preterm birth following excision for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia restricted to the first birth post treatment? |
title_short | Is the increased risk of preterm birth following excision for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia restricted to the first birth post treatment? |
title_sort | is the increased risk of preterm birth following excision for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia restricted to the first birth post treatment? |
topic | General Obstetrics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5008142/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25854594 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.13398 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT castanona istheincreasedriskofpretermbirthfollowingexcisionforcervicalintraepithelialneoplasiarestrictedtothefirstbirthposttreatment AT landyr istheincreasedriskofpretermbirthfollowingexcisionforcervicalintraepithelialneoplasiarestrictedtothefirstbirthposttreatment AT brocklehurstp istheincreasedriskofpretermbirthfollowingexcisionforcervicalintraepithelialneoplasiarestrictedtothefirstbirthposttreatment AT evansh istheincreasedriskofpretermbirthfollowingexcisionforcervicalintraepithelialneoplasiarestrictedtothefirstbirthposttreatment AT peeblesd istheincreasedriskofpretermbirthfollowingexcisionforcervicalintraepithelialneoplasiarestrictedtothefirstbirthposttreatment AT singhn istheincreasedriskofpretermbirthfollowingexcisionforcervicalintraepithelialneoplasiarestrictedtothefirstbirthposttreatment AT walkerp istheincreasedriskofpretermbirthfollowingexcisionforcervicalintraepithelialneoplasiarestrictedtothefirstbirthposttreatment AT patnickj istheincreasedriskofpretermbirthfollowingexcisionforcervicalintraepithelialneoplasiarestrictedtothefirstbirthposttreatment AT sasienip istheincreasedriskofpretermbirthfollowingexcisionforcervicalintraepithelialneoplasiarestrictedtothefirstbirthposttreatment AT istheincreasedriskofpretermbirthfollowingexcisionforcervicalintraepithelialneoplasiarestrictedtothefirstbirthposttreatment |