Cargando…

Is the increased risk of preterm birth following excision for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia restricted to the first birth post treatment?

OBJECTIVE: To explore whether the increased risk of preterm birth following treatment for cervical disease is limited to the first birth following colposcopy. DESIGN: Nested case–control study. SETTING: Twelve NHS hospitals in England. POPULATION: All nonmultiple births from women selected as cases...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Castañon, A, Landy, R, Brocklehurst, P, Evans, H, Peebles, D, Singh, N, Walker, P, Patnick, J, Sasieni, P
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5008142/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25854594
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.13398
_version_ 1782451321323913216
author Castañon, A
Landy, R
Brocklehurst, P
Evans, H
Peebles, D
Singh, N
Walker, P
Patnick, J
Sasieni, P
author_facet Castañon, A
Landy, R
Brocklehurst, P
Evans, H
Peebles, D
Singh, N
Walker, P
Patnick, J
Sasieni, P
author_sort Castañon, A
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To explore whether the increased risk of preterm birth following treatment for cervical disease is limited to the first birth following colposcopy. DESIGN: Nested case–control study. SETTING: Twelve NHS hospitals in England. POPULATION: All nonmultiple births from women selected as cases or controls from a cohort of women with both colposcopy and a hospital birth. Cases had a preterm (20–36 weeks of gestation) birth. Controls had a term birth (38–42 weeks) and no preterm. METHODS: Obstetric, colposcopy and pathology details were obtained. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Adjusted odds ratio of preterm birth in first and second or subsequent births following treatment for cervical disease. RESULTS: A total of 2798 births (1021 preterm) from 2001 women were included in the analysis. The risk of preterm birth increased with increasing depth of treatment among first births post treatment [trend per category increase in depth, categories <10 mm, 10–14 mm, 15–19 mm, ≥20 mm: odds ratio (OR) 1.23, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.12–1.36, P < 0.001] and among second and subsequent births post treatment (trend OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.15–1.56, P < 0.001). No trend was observed among births before colposcopy (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.83–1.16, P = 0.855). The absolute risk of a preterm birth following deep treatments (≥15 mm) was 6.5% among births before colposcopy, 18.9% among first births and 17.2% among second and subsequent births post treatment. Risk of preterm birth (once depth was accounted for) did not differ when comparing first births post colposcopy with second and subsequent births post colposcopy (adjusted OR 1.15, 95% CI 0.89–1.49). CONCLUSIONS: The increased risk of preterm birth following treatment for cervical disease is not restricted to the first birth post colposcopy; it remains for second and subsequent births. These results suggest that once a woman has a deep treatment she remains at higher risk of a preterm birth throughout her reproductive life. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Risk of preterm birth following large treatments for cervical disease remains for second and subsequent births.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5008142
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50081422016-09-16 Is the increased risk of preterm birth following excision for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia restricted to the first birth post treatment? Castañon, A Landy, R Brocklehurst, P Evans, H Peebles, D Singh, N Walker, P Patnick, J Sasieni, P BJOG General Obstetrics OBJECTIVE: To explore whether the increased risk of preterm birth following treatment for cervical disease is limited to the first birth following colposcopy. DESIGN: Nested case–control study. SETTING: Twelve NHS hospitals in England. POPULATION: All nonmultiple births from women selected as cases or controls from a cohort of women with both colposcopy and a hospital birth. Cases had a preterm (20–36 weeks of gestation) birth. Controls had a term birth (38–42 weeks) and no preterm. METHODS: Obstetric, colposcopy and pathology details were obtained. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Adjusted odds ratio of preterm birth in first and second or subsequent births following treatment for cervical disease. RESULTS: A total of 2798 births (1021 preterm) from 2001 women were included in the analysis. The risk of preterm birth increased with increasing depth of treatment among first births post treatment [trend per category increase in depth, categories <10 mm, 10–14 mm, 15–19 mm, ≥20 mm: odds ratio (OR) 1.23, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.12–1.36, P < 0.001] and among second and subsequent births post treatment (trend OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.15–1.56, P < 0.001). No trend was observed among births before colposcopy (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.83–1.16, P = 0.855). The absolute risk of a preterm birth following deep treatments (≥15 mm) was 6.5% among births before colposcopy, 18.9% among first births and 17.2% among second and subsequent births post treatment. Risk of preterm birth (once depth was accounted for) did not differ when comparing first births post colposcopy with second and subsequent births post colposcopy (adjusted OR 1.15, 95% CI 0.89–1.49). CONCLUSIONS: The increased risk of preterm birth following treatment for cervical disease is not restricted to the first birth post colposcopy; it remains for second and subsequent births. These results suggest that once a woman has a deep treatment she remains at higher risk of a preterm birth throughout her reproductive life. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Risk of preterm birth following large treatments for cervical disease remains for second and subsequent births. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-08 2015-04-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5008142/ /pubmed/25854594 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.13398 Text en © 2015 The Authors. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle General Obstetrics
Castañon, A
Landy, R
Brocklehurst, P
Evans, H
Peebles, D
Singh, N
Walker, P
Patnick, J
Sasieni, P
Is the increased risk of preterm birth following excision for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia restricted to the first birth post treatment?
title Is the increased risk of preterm birth following excision for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia restricted to the first birth post treatment?
title_full Is the increased risk of preterm birth following excision for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia restricted to the first birth post treatment?
title_fullStr Is the increased risk of preterm birth following excision for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia restricted to the first birth post treatment?
title_full_unstemmed Is the increased risk of preterm birth following excision for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia restricted to the first birth post treatment?
title_short Is the increased risk of preterm birth following excision for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia restricted to the first birth post treatment?
title_sort is the increased risk of preterm birth following excision for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia restricted to the first birth post treatment?
topic General Obstetrics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5008142/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25854594
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.13398
work_keys_str_mv AT castanona istheincreasedriskofpretermbirthfollowingexcisionforcervicalintraepithelialneoplasiarestrictedtothefirstbirthposttreatment
AT landyr istheincreasedriskofpretermbirthfollowingexcisionforcervicalintraepithelialneoplasiarestrictedtothefirstbirthposttreatment
AT brocklehurstp istheincreasedriskofpretermbirthfollowingexcisionforcervicalintraepithelialneoplasiarestrictedtothefirstbirthposttreatment
AT evansh istheincreasedriskofpretermbirthfollowingexcisionforcervicalintraepithelialneoplasiarestrictedtothefirstbirthposttreatment
AT peeblesd istheincreasedriskofpretermbirthfollowingexcisionforcervicalintraepithelialneoplasiarestrictedtothefirstbirthposttreatment
AT singhn istheincreasedriskofpretermbirthfollowingexcisionforcervicalintraepithelialneoplasiarestrictedtothefirstbirthposttreatment
AT walkerp istheincreasedriskofpretermbirthfollowingexcisionforcervicalintraepithelialneoplasiarestrictedtothefirstbirthposttreatment
AT patnickj istheincreasedriskofpretermbirthfollowingexcisionforcervicalintraepithelialneoplasiarestrictedtothefirstbirthposttreatment
AT sasienip istheincreasedriskofpretermbirthfollowingexcisionforcervicalintraepithelialneoplasiarestrictedtothefirstbirthposttreatment
AT istheincreasedriskofpretermbirthfollowingexcisionforcervicalintraepithelialneoplasiarestrictedtothefirstbirthposttreatment