Cargando…
Global patterns and controls of soil organic carbon dynamics as simulated by multiple terrestrial biosphere models: Current status and future directions
Soil is the largest organic carbon (C) pool of terrestrial ecosystems, and C loss from soil accounts for a large proportion of land‐atmosphere C exchange. Therefore, a small change in soil organic C (SOC) can affect atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO(2)) concentration and climate change. In the past dec...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5008182/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27642229 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2014GB005021 |
_version_ | 1782451326683185152 |
---|---|
author | Tian, Hanqin Lu, Chaoqun Yang, Jia Banger, Kamaljit Huntzinger, Deborah N. Schwalm, Christopher R. Michalak, Anna M. Cook, Robert Ciais, Philippe Hayes, Daniel Huang, Maoyi Ito, Akihiko Jain, Atul K. Lei, Huimin Mao, Jiafu Pan, Shufen Post, Wilfred M. Peng, Shushi Poulter, Benjamin Ren, Wei Ricciuto, Daniel Schaefer, Kevin Shi, Xiaoying Tao, Bo Wang, Weile Wei, Yaxing Yang, Qichun Zhang, Bowen Zeng, Ning |
author_facet | Tian, Hanqin Lu, Chaoqun Yang, Jia Banger, Kamaljit Huntzinger, Deborah N. Schwalm, Christopher R. Michalak, Anna M. Cook, Robert Ciais, Philippe Hayes, Daniel Huang, Maoyi Ito, Akihiko Jain, Atul K. Lei, Huimin Mao, Jiafu Pan, Shufen Post, Wilfred M. Peng, Shushi Poulter, Benjamin Ren, Wei Ricciuto, Daniel Schaefer, Kevin Shi, Xiaoying Tao, Bo Wang, Weile Wei, Yaxing Yang, Qichun Zhang, Bowen Zeng, Ning |
author_sort | Tian, Hanqin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Soil is the largest organic carbon (C) pool of terrestrial ecosystems, and C loss from soil accounts for a large proportion of land‐atmosphere C exchange. Therefore, a small change in soil organic C (SOC) can affect atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO(2)) concentration and climate change. In the past decades, a wide variety of studies have been conducted to quantify global SOC stocks and soil C exchange with the atmosphere through site measurements, inventories, and empirical/process‐based modeling. However, these estimates are highly uncertain, and identifying major driving forces controlling soil C dynamics remains a key research challenge. This study has compiled century‐long (1901–2010) estimates of SOC storage and heterotrophic respiration (Rh) from 10 terrestrial biosphere models (TBMs) in the Multi‐scale Synthesis and Terrestrial Model Intercomparison Project and two observation‐based data sets. The 10 TBM ensemble shows that global SOC estimate ranges from 425 to 2111 Pg C (1 Pg = 10(15) g) with a median value of 1158 Pg C in 2010. The models estimate a broad range of Rh from 35 to 69 Pg C yr(−1) with a median value of 51 Pg C yr(−1) during 2001–2010. The largest uncertainty in SOC stocks exists in the 40–65°N latitude whereas the largest cross‐model divergence in Rh are in the tropics. The modeled SOC change during 1901–2010 ranges from −70 Pg C to 86 Pg C, but in some models the SOC change has a different sign from the change of total C stock, implying very different contribution of vegetation and soil pools in determining the terrestrial C budget among models. The model ensemble‐estimated mean residence time of SOC shows a reduction of 3.4 years over the past century, which accelerate C cycling through the land biosphere. All the models agreed that climate and land use changes decreased SOC stocks, while elevated atmospheric CO(2) and nitrogen deposition over intact ecosystems increased SOC stocks—even though the responses varied significantly among models. Model representations of temperature and moisture sensitivity, nutrient limitation, and land use partially explain the divergent estimates of global SOC stocks and soil C fluxes in this study. In addition, a major source of systematic error in model estimations relates to nonmodeled SOC storage in wetlands and peatlands, as well as to old C storage in deep soil layers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5008182 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50081822016-09-16 Global patterns and controls of soil organic carbon dynamics as simulated by multiple terrestrial biosphere models: Current status and future directions Tian, Hanqin Lu, Chaoqun Yang, Jia Banger, Kamaljit Huntzinger, Deborah N. Schwalm, Christopher R. Michalak, Anna M. Cook, Robert Ciais, Philippe Hayes, Daniel Huang, Maoyi Ito, Akihiko Jain, Atul K. Lei, Huimin Mao, Jiafu Pan, Shufen Post, Wilfred M. Peng, Shushi Poulter, Benjamin Ren, Wei Ricciuto, Daniel Schaefer, Kevin Shi, Xiaoying Tao, Bo Wang, Weile Wei, Yaxing Yang, Qichun Zhang, Bowen Zeng, Ning Global Biogeochem Cycles Research Articles Soil is the largest organic carbon (C) pool of terrestrial ecosystems, and C loss from soil accounts for a large proportion of land‐atmosphere C exchange. Therefore, a small change in soil organic C (SOC) can affect atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO(2)) concentration and climate change. In the past decades, a wide variety of studies have been conducted to quantify global SOC stocks and soil C exchange with the atmosphere through site measurements, inventories, and empirical/process‐based modeling. However, these estimates are highly uncertain, and identifying major driving forces controlling soil C dynamics remains a key research challenge. This study has compiled century‐long (1901–2010) estimates of SOC storage and heterotrophic respiration (Rh) from 10 terrestrial biosphere models (TBMs) in the Multi‐scale Synthesis and Terrestrial Model Intercomparison Project and two observation‐based data sets. The 10 TBM ensemble shows that global SOC estimate ranges from 425 to 2111 Pg C (1 Pg = 10(15) g) with a median value of 1158 Pg C in 2010. The models estimate a broad range of Rh from 35 to 69 Pg C yr(−1) with a median value of 51 Pg C yr(−1) during 2001–2010. The largest uncertainty in SOC stocks exists in the 40–65°N latitude whereas the largest cross‐model divergence in Rh are in the tropics. The modeled SOC change during 1901–2010 ranges from −70 Pg C to 86 Pg C, but in some models the SOC change has a different sign from the change of total C stock, implying very different contribution of vegetation and soil pools in determining the terrestrial C budget among models. The model ensemble‐estimated mean residence time of SOC shows a reduction of 3.4 years over the past century, which accelerate C cycling through the land biosphere. All the models agreed that climate and land use changes decreased SOC stocks, while elevated atmospheric CO(2) and nitrogen deposition over intact ecosystems increased SOC stocks—even though the responses varied significantly among models. Model representations of temperature and moisture sensitivity, nutrient limitation, and land use partially explain the divergent estimates of global SOC stocks and soil C fluxes in this study. In addition, a major source of systematic error in model estimations relates to nonmodeled SOC storage in wetlands and peatlands, as well as to old C storage in deep soil layers. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-06-05 2015-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5008182/ /pubmed/27642229 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2014GB005021 Text en ©2015. The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Tian, Hanqin Lu, Chaoqun Yang, Jia Banger, Kamaljit Huntzinger, Deborah N. Schwalm, Christopher R. Michalak, Anna M. Cook, Robert Ciais, Philippe Hayes, Daniel Huang, Maoyi Ito, Akihiko Jain, Atul K. Lei, Huimin Mao, Jiafu Pan, Shufen Post, Wilfred M. Peng, Shushi Poulter, Benjamin Ren, Wei Ricciuto, Daniel Schaefer, Kevin Shi, Xiaoying Tao, Bo Wang, Weile Wei, Yaxing Yang, Qichun Zhang, Bowen Zeng, Ning Global patterns and controls of soil organic carbon dynamics as simulated by multiple terrestrial biosphere models: Current status and future directions |
title | Global patterns and controls of soil organic carbon dynamics as simulated by multiple terrestrial biosphere models: Current status and future directions |
title_full | Global patterns and controls of soil organic carbon dynamics as simulated by multiple terrestrial biosphere models: Current status and future directions |
title_fullStr | Global patterns and controls of soil organic carbon dynamics as simulated by multiple terrestrial biosphere models: Current status and future directions |
title_full_unstemmed | Global patterns and controls of soil organic carbon dynamics as simulated by multiple terrestrial biosphere models: Current status and future directions |
title_short | Global patterns and controls of soil organic carbon dynamics as simulated by multiple terrestrial biosphere models: Current status and future directions |
title_sort | global patterns and controls of soil organic carbon dynamics as simulated by multiple terrestrial biosphere models: current status and future directions |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5008182/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27642229 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2014GB005021 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tianhanqin globalpatternsandcontrolsofsoilorganiccarbondynamicsassimulatedbymultipleterrestrialbiospheremodelscurrentstatusandfuturedirections AT luchaoqun globalpatternsandcontrolsofsoilorganiccarbondynamicsassimulatedbymultipleterrestrialbiospheremodelscurrentstatusandfuturedirections AT yangjia globalpatternsandcontrolsofsoilorganiccarbondynamicsassimulatedbymultipleterrestrialbiospheremodelscurrentstatusandfuturedirections AT bangerkamaljit globalpatternsandcontrolsofsoilorganiccarbondynamicsassimulatedbymultipleterrestrialbiospheremodelscurrentstatusandfuturedirections AT huntzingerdeborahn globalpatternsandcontrolsofsoilorganiccarbondynamicsassimulatedbymultipleterrestrialbiospheremodelscurrentstatusandfuturedirections AT schwalmchristopherr globalpatternsandcontrolsofsoilorganiccarbondynamicsassimulatedbymultipleterrestrialbiospheremodelscurrentstatusandfuturedirections AT michalakannam globalpatternsandcontrolsofsoilorganiccarbondynamicsassimulatedbymultipleterrestrialbiospheremodelscurrentstatusandfuturedirections AT cookrobert globalpatternsandcontrolsofsoilorganiccarbondynamicsassimulatedbymultipleterrestrialbiospheremodelscurrentstatusandfuturedirections AT ciaisphilippe globalpatternsandcontrolsofsoilorganiccarbondynamicsassimulatedbymultipleterrestrialbiospheremodelscurrentstatusandfuturedirections AT hayesdaniel globalpatternsandcontrolsofsoilorganiccarbondynamicsassimulatedbymultipleterrestrialbiospheremodelscurrentstatusandfuturedirections AT huangmaoyi globalpatternsandcontrolsofsoilorganiccarbondynamicsassimulatedbymultipleterrestrialbiospheremodelscurrentstatusandfuturedirections AT itoakihiko globalpatternsandcontrolsofsoilorganiccarbondynamicsassimulatedbymultipleterrestrialbiospheremodelscurrentstatusandfuturedirections AT jainatulk globalpatternsandcontrolsofsoilorganiccarbondynamicsassimulatedbymultipleterrestrialbiospheremodelscurrentstatusandfuturedirections AT leihuimin globalpatternsandcontrolsofsoilorganiccarbondynamicsassimulatedbymultipleterrestrialbiospheremodelscurrentstatusandfuturedirections AT maojiafu globalpatternsandcontrolsofsoilorganiccarbondynamicsassimulatedbymultipleterrestrialbiospheremodelscurrentstatusandfuturedirections AT panshufen globalpatternsandcontrolsofsoilorganiccarbondynamicsassimulatedbymultipleterrestrialbiospheremodelscurrentstatusandfuturedirections AT postwilfredm globalpatternsandcontrolsofsoilorganiccarbondynamicsassimulatedbymultipleterrestrialbiospheremodelscurrentstatusandfuturedirections AT pengshushi globalpatternsandcontrolsofsoilorganiccarbondynamicsassimulatedbymultipleterrestrialbiospheremodelscurrentstatusandfuturedirections AT poulterbenjamin globalpatternsandcontrolsofsoilorganiccarbondynamicsassimulatedbymultipleterrestrialbiospheremodelscurrentstatusandfuturedirections AT renwei globalpatternsandcontrolsofsoilorganiccarbondynamicsassimulatedbymultipleterrestrialbiospheremodelscurrentstatusandfuturedirections AT ricciutodaniel globalpatternsandcontrolsofsoilorganiccarbondynamicsassimulatedbymultipleterrestrialbiospheremodelscurrentstatusandfuturedirections AT schaeferkevin globalpatternsandcontrolsofsoilorganiccarbondynamicsassimulatedbymultipleterrestrialbiospheremodelscurrentstatusandfuturedirections AT shixiaoying globalpatternsandcontrolsofsoilorganiccarbondynamicsassimulatedbymultipleterrestrialbiospheremodelscurrentstatusandfuturedirections AT taobo globalpatternsandcontrolsofsoilorganiccarbondynamicsassimulatedbymultipleterrestrialbiospheremodelscurrentstatusandfuturedirections AT wangweile globalpatternsandcontrolsofsoilorganiccarbondynamicsassimulatedbymultipleterrestrialbiospheremodelscurrentstatusandfuturedirections AT weiyaxing globalpatternsandcontrolsofsoilorganiccarbondynamicsassimulatedbymultipleterrestrialbiospheremodelscurrentstatusandfuturedirections AT yangqichun globalpatternsandcontrolsofsoilorganiccarbondynamicsassimulatedbymultipleterrestrialbiospheremodelscurrentstatusandfuturedirections AT zhangbowen globalpatternsandcontrolsofsoilorganiccarbondynamicsassimulatedbymultipleterrestrialbiospheremodelscurrentstatusandfuturedirections AT zengning globalpatternsandcontrolsofsoilorganiccarbondynamicsassimulatedbymultipleterrestrialbiospheremodelscurrentstatusandfuturedirections |