Cargando…

Global patterns and controls of soil organic carbon dynamics as simulated by multiple terrestrial biosphere models: Current status and future directions

Soil is the largest organic carbon (C) pool of terrestrial ecosystems, and C loss from soil accounts for a large proportion of land‐atmosphere C exchange. Therefore, a small change in soil organic C (SOC) can affect atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO(2)) concentration and climate change. In the past dec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tian, Hanqin, Lu, Chaoqun, Yang, Jia, Banger, Kamaljit, Huntzinger, Deborah N., Schwalm, Christopher R., Michalak, Anna M., Cook, Robert, Ciais, Philippe, Hayes, Daniel, Huang, Maoyi, Ito, Akihiko, Jain, Atul K., Lei, Huimin, Mao, Jiafu, Pan, Shufen, Post, Wilfred M., Peng, Shushi, Poulter, Benjamin, Ren, Wei, Ricciuto, Daniel, Schaefer, Kevin, Shi, Xiaoying, Tao, Bo, Wang, Weile, Wei, Yaxing, Yang, Qichun, Zhang, Bowen, Zeng, Ning
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5008182/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27642229
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2014GB005021
_version_ 1782451326683185152
author Tian, Hanqin
Lu, Chaoqun
Yang, Jia
Banger, Kamaljit
Huntzinger, Deborah N.
Schwalm, Christopher R.
Michalak, Anna M.
Cook, Robert
Ciais, Philippe
Hayes, Daniel
Huang, Maoyi
Ito, Akihiko
Jain, Atul K.
Lei, Huimin
Mao, Jiafu
Pan, Shufen
Post, Wilfred M.
Peng, Shushi
Poulter, Benjamin
Ren, Wei
Ricciuto, Daniel
Schaefer, Kevin
Shi, Xiaoying
Tao, Bo
Wang, Weile
Wei, Yaxing
Yang, Qichun
Zhang, Bowen
Zeng, Ning
author_facet Tian, Hanqin
Lu, Chaoqun
Yang, Jia
Banger, Kamaljit
Huntzinger, Deborah N.
Schwalm, Christopher R.
Michalak, Anna M.
Cook, Robert
Ciais, Philippe
Hayes, Daniel
Huang, Maoyi
Ito, Akihiko
Jain, Atul K.
Lei, Huimin
Mao, Jiafu
Pan, Shufen
Post, Wilfred M.
Peng, Shushi
Poulter, Benjamin
Ren, Wei
Ricciuto, Daniel
Schaefer, Kevin
Shi, Xiaoying
Tao, Bo
Wang, Weile
Wei, Yaxing
Yang, Qichun
Zhang, Bowen
Zeng, Ning
author_sort Tian, Hanqin
collection PubMed
description Soil is the largest organic carbon (C) pool of terrestrial ecosystems, and C loss from soil accounts for a large proportion of land‐atmosphere C exchange. Therefore, a small change in soil organic C (SOC) can affect atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO(2)) concentration and climate change. In the past decades, a wide variety of studies have been conducted to quantify global SOC stocks and soil C exchange with the atmosphere through site measurements, inventories, and empirical/process‐based modeling. However, these estimates are highly uncertain, and identifying major driving forces controlling soil C dynamics remains a key research challenge. This study has compiled century‐long (1901–2010) estimates of SOC storage and heterotrophic respiration (Rh) from 10 terrestrial biosphere models (TBMs) in the Multi‐scale Synthesis and Terrestrial Model Intercomparison Project and two observation‐based data sets. The 10 TBM ensemble shows that global SOC estimate ranges from 425 to 2111 Pg C (1 Pg = 10(15) g) with a median value of 1158 Pg C in 2010. The models estimate a broad range of Rh from 35 to 69 Pg C yr(−1) with a median value of 51 Pg C yr(−1) during 2001–2010. The largest uncertainty in SOC stocks exists in the 40–65°N latitude whereas the largest cross‐model divergence in Rh are in the tropics. The modeled SOC change during 1901–2010 ranges from −70 Pg C to 86 Pg C, but in some models the SOC change has a different sign from the change of total C stock, implying very different contribution of vegetation and soil pools in determining the terrestrial C budget among models. The model ensemble‐estimated mean residence time of SOC shows a reduction of 3.4 years over the past century, which accelerate C cycling through the land biosphere. All the models agreed that climate and land use changes decreased SOC stocks, while elevated atmospheric CO(2) and nitrogen deposition over intact ecosystems increased SOC stocks—even though the responses varied significantly among models. Model representations of temperature and moisture sensitivity, nutrient limitation, and land use partially explain the divergent estimates of global SOC stocks and soil C fluxes in this study. In addition, a major source of systematic error in model estimations relates to nonmodeled SOC storage in wetlands and peatlands, as well as to old C storage in deep soil layers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5008182
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50081822016-09-16 Global patterns and controls of soil organic carbon dynamics as simulated by multiple terrestrial biosphere models: Current status and future directions Tian, Hanqin Lu, Chaoqun Yang, Jia Banger, Kamaljit Huntzinger, Deborah N. Schwalm, Christopher R. Michalak, Anna M. Cook, Robert Ciais, Philippe Hayes, Daniel Huang, Maoyi Ito, Akihiko Jain, Atul K. Lei, Huimin Mao, Jiafu Pan, Shufen Post, Wilfred M. Peng, Shushi Poulter, Benjamin Ren, Wei Ricciuto, Daniel Schaefer, Kevin Shi, Xiaoying Tao, Bo Wang, Weile Wei, Yaxing Yang, Qichun Zhang, Bowen Zeng, Ning Global Biogeochem Cycles Research Articles Soil is the largest organic carbon (C) pool of terrestrial ecosystems, and C loss from soil accounts for a large proportion of land‐atmosphere C exchange. Therefore, a small change in soil organic C (SOC) can affect atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO(2)) concentration and climate change. In the past decades, a wide variety of studies have been conducted to quantify global SOC stocks and soil C exchange with the atmosphere through site measurements, inventories, and empirical/process‐based modeling. However, these estimates are highly uncertain, and identifying major driving forces controlling soil C dynamics remains a key research challenge. This study has compiled century‐long (1901–2010) estimates of SOC storage and heterotrophic respiration (Rh) from 10 terrestrial biosphere models (TBMs) in the Multi‐scale Synthesis and Terrestrial Model Intercomparison Project and two observation‐based data sets. The 10 TBM ensemble shows that global SOC estimate ranges from 425 to 2111 Pg C (1 Pg = 10(15) g) with a median value of 1158 Pg C in 2010. The models estimate a broad range of Rh from 35 to 69 Pg C yr(−1) with a median value of 51 Pg C yr(−1) during 2001–2010. The largest uncertainty in SOC stocks exists in the 40–65°N latitude whereas the largest cross‐model divergence in Rh are in the tropics. The modeled SOC change during 1901–2010 ranges from −70 Pg C to 86 Pg C, but in some models the SOC change has a different sign from the change of total C stock, implying very different contribution of vegetation and soil pools in determining the terrestrial C budget among models. The model ensemble‐estimated mean residence time of SOC shows a reduction of 3.4 years over the past century, which accelerate C cycling through the land biosphere. All the models agreed that climate and land use changes decreased SOC stocks, while elevated atmospheric CO(2) and nitrogen deposition over intact ecosystems increased SOC stocks—even though the responses varied significantly among models. Model representations of temperature and moisture sensitivity, nutrient limitation, and land use partially explain the divergent estimates of global SOC stocks and soil C fluxes in this study. In addition, a major source of systematic error in model estimations relates to nonmodeled SOC storage in wetlands and peatlands, as well as to old C storage in deep soil layers. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-06-05 2015-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5008182/ /pubmed/27642229 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2014GB005021 Text en ©2015. The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Tian, Hanqin
Lu, Chaoqun
Yang, Jia
Banger, Kamaljit
Huntzinger, Deborah N.
Schwalm, Christopher R.
Michalak, Anna M.
Cook, Robert
Ciais, Philippe
Hayes, Daniel
Huang, Maoyi
Ito, Akihiko
Jain, Atul K.
Lei, Huimin
Mao, Jiafu
Pan, Shufen
Post, Wilfred M.
Peng, Shushi
Poulter, Benjamin
Ren, Wei
Ricciuto, Daniel
Schaefer, Kevin
Shi, Xiaoying
Tao, Bo
Wang, Weile
Wei, Yaxing
Yang, Qichun
Zhang, Bowen
Zeng, Ning
Global patterns and controls of soil organic carbon dynamics as simulated by multiple terrestrial biosphere models: Current status and future directions
title Global patterns and controls of soil organic carbon dynamics as simulated by multiple terrestrial biosphere models: Current status and future directions
title_full Global patterns and controls of soil organic carbon dynamics as simulated by multiple terrestrial biosphere models: Current status and future directions
title_fullStr Global patterns and controls of soil organic carbon dynamics as simulated by multiple terrestrial biosphere models: Current status and future directions
title_full_unstemmed Global patterns and controls of soil organic carbon dynamics as simulated by multiple terrestrial biosphere models: Current status and future directions
title_short Global patterns and controls of soil organic carbon dynamics as simulated by multiple terrestrial biosphere models: Current status and future directions
title_sort global patterns and controls of soil organic carbon dynamics as simulated by multiple terrestrial biosphere models: current status and future directions
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5008182/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27642229
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2014GB005021
work_keys_str_mv AT tianhanqin globalpatternsandcontrolsofsoilorganiccarbondynamicsassimulatedbymultipleterrestrialbiospheremodelscurrentstatusandfuturedirections
AT luchaoqun globalpatternsandcontrolsofsoilorganiccarbondynamicsassimulatedbymultipleterrestrialbiospheremodelscurrentstatusandfuturedirections
AT yangjia globalpatternsandcontrolsofsoilorganiccarbondynamicsassimulatedbymultipleterrestrialbiospheremodelscurrentstatusandfuturedirections
AT bangerkamaljit globalpatternsandcontrolsofsoilorganiccarbondynamicsassimulatedbymultipleterrestrialbiospheremodelscurrentstatusandfuturedirections
AT huntzingerdeborahn globalpatternsandcontrolsofsoilorganiccarbondynamicsassimulatedbymultipleterrestrialbiospheremodelscurrentstatusandfuturedirections
AT schwalmchristopherr globalpatternsandcontrolsofsoilorganiccarbondynamicsassimulatedbymultipleterrestrialbiospheremodelscurrentstatusandfuturedirections
AT michalakannam globalpatternsandcontrolsofsoilorganiccarbondynamicsassimulatedbymultipleterrestrialbiospheremodelscurrentstatusandfuturedirections
AT cookrobert globalpatternsandcontrolsofsoilorganiccarbondynamicsassimulatedbymultipleterrestrialbiospheremodelscurrentstatusandfuturedirections
AT ciaisphilippe globalpatternsandcontrolsofsoilorganiccarbondynamicsassimulatedbymultipleterrestrialbiospheremodelscurrentstatusandfuturedirections
AT hayesdaniel globalpatternsandcontrolsofsoilorganiccarbondynamicsassimulatedbymultipleterrestrialbiospheremodelscurrentstatusandfuturedirections
AT huangmaoyi globalpatternsandcontrolsofsoilorganiccarbondynamicsassimulatedbymultipleterrestrialbiospheremodelscurrentstatusandfuturedirections
AT itoakihiko globalpatternsandcontrolsofsoilorganiccarbondynamicsassimulatedbymultipleterrestrialbiospheremodelscurrentstatusandfuturedirections
AT jainatulk globalpatternsandcontrolsofsoilorganiccarbondynamicsassimulatedbymultipleterrestrialbiospheremodelscurrentstatusandfuturedirections
AT leihuimin globalpatternsandcontrolsofsoilorganiccarbondynamicsassimulatedbymultipleterrestrialbiospheremodelscurrentstatusandfuturedirections
AT maojiafu globalpatternsandcontrolsofsoilorganiccarbondynamicsassimulatedbymultipleterrestrialbiospheremodelscurrentstatusandfuturedirections
AT panshufen globalpatternsandcontrolsofsoilorganiccarbondynamicsassimulatedbymultipleterrestrialbiospheremodelscurrentstatusandfuturedirections
AT postwilfredm globalpatternsandcontrolsofsoilorganiccarbondynamicsassimulatedbymultipleterrestrialbiospheremodelscurrentstatusandfuturedirections
AT pengshushi globalpatternsandcontrolsofsoilorganiccarbondynamicsassimulatedbymultipleterrestrialbiospheremodelscurrentstatusandfuturedirections
AT poulterbenjamin globalpatternsandcontrolsofsoilorganiccarbondynamicsassimulatedbymultipleterrestrialbiospheremodelscurrentstatusandfuturedirections
AT renwei globalpatternsandcontrolsofsoilorganiccarbondynamicsassimulatedbymultipleterrestrialbiospheremodelscurrentstatusandfuturedirections
AT ricciutodaniel globalpatternsandcontrolsofsoilorganiccarbondynamicsassimulatedbymultipleterrestrialbiospheremodelscurrentstatusandfuturedirections
AT schaeferkevin globalpatternsandcontrolsofsoilorganiccarbondynamicsassimulatedbymultipleterrestrialbiospheremodelscurrentstatusandfuturedirections
AT shixiaoying globalpatternsandcontrolsofsoilorganiccarbondynamicsassimulatedbymultipleterrestrialbiospheremodelscurrentstatusandfuturedirections
AT taobo globalpatternsandcontrolsofsoilorganiccarbondynamicsassimulatedbymultipleterrestrialbiospheremodelscurrentstatusandfuturedirections
AT wangweile globalpatternsandcontrolsofsoilorganiccarbondynamicsassimulatedbymultipleterrestrialbiospheremodelscurrentstatusandfuturedirections
AT weiyaxing globalpatternsandcontrolsofsoilorganiccarbondynamicsassimulatedbymultipleterrestrialbiospheremodelscurrentstatusandfuturedirections
AT yangqichun globalpatternsandcontrolsofsoilorganiccarbondynamicsassimulatedbymultipleterrestrialbiospheremodelscurrentstatusandfuturedirections
AT zhangbowen globalpatternsandcontrolsofsoilorganiccarbondynamicsassimulatedbymultipleterrestrialbiospheremodelscurrentstatusandfuturedirections
AT zengning globalpatternsandcontrolsofsoilorganiccarbondynamicsassimulatedbymultipleterrestrialbiospheremodelscurrentstatusandfuturedirections