Cargando…

Diagnostic accuracy of staging laparoscopy for detecting metastasized or locally advanced perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Despite extensive preoperative staging, still almost half of patients with potentially resectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC) have locally advanced or metastasized disease upon exploratory laparotomy. The value of routine staging laparoscopy (SL) in these patients remains unclear...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Coelen, Robert J. S., Ruys, Anthony T., Besselink, Marc G. H., Busch, Olivier R. C., van Gulik, Thomas M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5009158/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26895909
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4788-y
_version_ 1782451483443200000
author Coelen, Robert J. S.
Ruys, Anthony T.
Besselink, Marc G. H.
Busch, Olivier R. C.
van Gulik, Thomas M.
author_facet Coelen, Robert J. S.
Ruys, Anthony T.
Besselink, Marc G. H.
Busch, Olivier R. C.
van Gulik, Thomas M.
author_sort Coelen, Robert J. S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite extensive preoperative staging, still almost half of patients with potentially resectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC) have locally advanced or metastasized disease upon exploratory laparotomy. The value of routine staging laparoscopy (SL) in these patients remains unclear with varying results reported in the literature. The aim of the present systematic review was to provide an overview of studies on SL in PHC and to define its current role in preoperative staging. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed in PubMed and EMBASE regarding studies providing data on the diagnostic accuracy of SL in PHC. Primary outcome measures were the overall yield and sensitivity to detect unresectable disease. Secondary outcomes were the yield and sensitivity for recent studies (after 2010) and large study cohorts (≥100 patients) and specific (metastatic) lesions. Methodological quality of studies was assessed with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool. RESULTS: From 173 records, 12 studies including 832 patients met the inclusion criteria. The yield of SL in PHC varied from 6.4 to 45.0 % with a pooled yield of 24.4 % [95 % confidence interval (CI) 16.4–33.4]. Sensitivity to detect unresectable disease ranged from 31.6 to 75 % with a pooled sensitivity of 52.2 % (95 % CI 47.1–57.2). Sensitivity was highest for peritoneal metastases (80.7 %, 95 % CI 70.9–88.3). Subgroup analysis revealed that the yield and sensitivity tended to be lower for studies after 2010. Considerable heterogeneity was detected among the studies. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the pooled analyses suggest that one in four patients with potentially resectable PHC benefits from SL. Given considerable heterogeneity, a trend to lower yield in more recent studies and further improvement of preoperative imaging over time, the routine use of SL seems discouraging. Studies that identify predictors of unresectability, that enable selection of patients who will benefit the most from this procedure, are needed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00464-016-4788-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5009158
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50091582016-09-16 Diagnostic accuracy of staging laparoscopy for detecting metastasized or locally advanced perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis Coelen, Robert J. S. Ruys, Anthony T. Besselink, Marc G. H. Busch, Olivier R. C. van Gulik, Thomas M. Surg Endosc Review BACKGROUND: Despite extensive preoperative staging, still almost half of patients with potentially resectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC) have locally advanced or metastasized disease upon exploratory laparotomy. The value of routine staging laparoscopy (SL) in these patients remains unclear with varying results reported in the literature. The aim of the present systematic review was to provide an overview of studies on SL in PHC and to define its current role in preoperative staging. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed in PubMed and EMBASE regarding studies providing data on the diagnostic accuracy of SL in PHC. Primary outcome measures were the overall yield and sensitivity to detect unresectable disease. Secondary outcomes were the yield and sensitivity for recent studies (after 2010) and large study cohorts (≥100 patients) and specific (metastatic) lesions. Methodological quality of studies was assessed with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool. RESULTS: From 173 records, 12 studies including 832 patients met the inclusion criteria. The yield of SL in PHC varied from 6.4 to 45.0 % with a pooled yield of 24.4 % [95 % confidence interval (CI) 16.4–33.4]. Sensitivity to detect unresectable disease ranged from 31.6 to 75 % with a pooled sensitivity of 52.2 % (95 % CI 47.1–57.2). Sensitivity was highest for peritoneal metastases (80.7 %, 95 % CI 70.9–88.3). Subgroup analysis revealed that the yield and sensitivity tended to be lower for studies after 2010. Considerable heterogeneity was detected among the studies. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the pooled analyses suggest that one in four patients with potentially resectable PHC benefits from SL. Given considerable heterogeneity, a trend to lower yield in more recent studies and further improvement of preoperative imaging over time, the routine use of SL seems discouraging. Studies that identify predictors of unresectability, that enable selection of patients who will benefit the most from this procedure, are needed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00464-016-4788-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2016-02-19 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5009158/ /pubmed/26895909 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4788-y Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Review
Coelen, Robert J. S.
Ruys, Anthony T.
Besselink, Marc G. H.
Busch, Olivier R. C.
van Gulik, Thomas M.
Diagnostic accuracy of staging laparoscopy for detecting metastasized or locally advanced perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Diagnostic accuracy of staging laparoscopy for detecting metastasized or locally advanced perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Diagnostic accuracy of staging laparoscopy for detecting metastasized or locally advanced perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Diagnostic accuracy of staging laparoscopy for detecting metastasized or locally advanced perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic accuracy of staging laparoscopy for detecting metastasized or locally advanced perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Diagnostic accuracy of staging laparoscopy for detecting metastasized or locally advanced perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort diagnostic accuracy of staging laparoscopy for detecting metastasized or locally advanced perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5009158/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26895909
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4788-y
work_keys_str_mv AT coelenrobertjs diagnosticaccuracyofstaginglaparoscopyfordetectingmetastasizedorlocallyadvancedperihilarcholangiocarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ruysanthonyt diagnosticaccuracyofstaginglaparoscopyfordetectingmetastasizedorlocallyadvancedperihilarcholangiocarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT besselinkmarcgh diagnosticaccuracyofstaginglaparoscopyfordetectingmetastasizedorlocallyadvancedperihilarcholangiocarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT buscholivierrc diagnosticaccuracyofstaginglaparoscopyfordetectingmetastasizedorlocallyadvancedperihilarcholangiocarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT vangulikthomasm diagnosticaccuracyofstaginglaparoscopyfordetectingmetastasizedorlocallyadvancedperihilarcholangiocarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis