Cargando…
The value of “constant sharpness” as a diagnostic sign in MR-Mammography
PURPOSE: To examine “constant lesion sharpness” as a morphological diagnostic sign in the differential diagnosis between benign and malignant lesions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This prospective study had institutional review board approval and was HIPAA compliant. In total 1014 consecutive patients were...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5009188/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27622201 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2016.08.004 |
_version_ | 1782451489410646016 |
---|---|
author | Kaiser, Clemens G. Baltzer, Pascal Kaiser, Anna K. Krammer, Julia Uder, Michael Kaiser, Werner A. Dietzel, Matthias |
author_facet | Kaiser, Clemens G. Baltzer, Pascal Kaiser, Anna K. Krammer, Julia Uder, Michael Kaiser, Werner A. Dietzel, Matthias |
author_sort | Kaiser, Clemens G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To examine “constant lesion sharpness” as a morphological diagnostic sign in the differential diagnosis between benign and malignant lesions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This prospective study had institutional review board approval and was HIPAA compliant. In total 1014 consecutive patients were examined (mean age 55 years ± 13 years) and evaluated in our University hospital towards the morphological shape of the lesion borders. The “Constant sharpness Sign” was defined as a lesion remaining continuously sharp for the duration of the dynamic scan. Inclusion criteria were unclear findings (e.g. BIRADS III/IV), Preoperative staging (BRIDAS IV/V), and referred patients from local clinic of gynecology. Exclusion criteria were MRM-examination ≤1 year before, status after surgery and/or biopsy, chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy. Reference Standard was histological verification. Images were diagnosed by two experienced radiologists in consensus, blinded to the standard of reference. RESULTS: 1014 patients with 1084 lesions (436 benign, 648 malignant lesions) were included into the study. 41.5% of benign lesions and 6.8% (181/436) of malignant lesions displayed a constant sharpness as an accompanying morphological sign (P < 0.001). This resulted in a sensitivity of 41.5%, specificity of 93.2%, a positive likelihood ratio of 6.1%, a negative likelihood ratio of 0.63 and an odd’s ratio of 9,7%. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION: The constant sharpness sign seems to be an accurate predictor of benign breast lesions, which may help to increase the accuracy of MRM as a morphological sign. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5009188 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50091882016-09-12 The value of “constant sharpness” as a diagnostic sign in MR-Mammography Kaiser, Clemens G. Baltzer, Pascal Kaiser, Anna K. Krammer, Julia Uder, Michael Kaiser, Werner A. Dietzel, Matthias Eur J Radiol Open Article PURPOSE: To examine “constant lesion sharpness” as a morphological diagnostic sign in the differential diagnosis between benign and malignant lesions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This prospective study had institutional review board approval and was HIPAA compliant. In total 1014 consecutive patients were examined (mean age 55 years ± 13 years) and evaluated in our University hospital towards the morphological shape of the lesion borders. The “Constant sharpness Sign” was defined as a lesion remaining continuously sharp for the duration of the dynamic scan. Inclusion criteria were unclear findings (e.g. BIRADS III/IV), Preoperative staging (BRIDAS IV/V), and referred patients from local clinic of gynecology. Exclusion criteria were MRM-examination ≤1 year before, status after surgery and/or biopsy, chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy. Reference Standard was histological verification. Images were diagnosed by two experienced radiologists in consensus, blinded to the standard of reference. RESULTS: 1014 patients with 1084 lesions (436 benign, 648 malignant lesions) were included into the study. 41.5% of benign lesions and 6.8% (181/436) of malignant lesions displayed a constant sharpness as an accompanying morphological sign (P < 0.001). This resulted in a sensitivity of 41.5%, specificity of 93.2%, a positive likelihood ratio of 6.1%, a negative likelihood ratio of 0.63 and an odd’s ratio of 9,7%. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION: The constant sharpness sign seems to be an accurate predictor of benign breast lesions, which may help to increase the accuracy of MRM as a morphological sign. Elsevier 2016-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5009188/ /pubmed/27622201 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2016.08.004 Text en © 2016 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Kaiser, Clemens G. Baltzer, Pascal Kaiser, Anna K. Krammer, Julia Uder, Michael Kaiser, Werner A. Dietzel, Matthias The value of “constant sharpness” as a diagnostic sign in MR-Mammography |
title | The value of “constant sharpness” as a diagnostic sign in MR-Mammography |
title_full | The value of “constant sharpness” as a diagnostic sign in MR-Mammography |
title_fullStr | The value of “constant sharpness” as a diagnostic sign in MR-Mammography |
title_full_unstemmed | The value of “constant sharpness” as a diagnostic sign in MR-Mammography |
title_short | The value of “constant sharpness” as a diagnostic sign in MR-Mammography |
title_sort | value of “constant sharpness” as a diagnostic sign in mr-mammography |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5009188/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27622201 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2016.08.004 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kaiserclemensg thevalueofconstantsharpnessasadiagnosticsigninmrmammography AT baltzerpascal thevalueofconstantsharpnessasadiagnosticsigninmrmammography AT kaiserannak thevalueofconstantsharpnessasadiagnosticsigninmrmammography AT krammerjulia thevalueofconstantsharpnessasadiagnosticsigninmrmammography AT udermichael thevalueofconstantsharpnessasadiagnosticsigninmrmammography AT kaiserwernera thevalueofconstantsharpnessasadiagnosticsigninmrmammography AT dietzelmatthias thevalueofconstantsharpnessasadiagnosticsigninmrmammography AT kaiserclemensg valueofconstantsharpnessasadiagnosticsigninmrmammography AT baltzerpascal valueofconstantsharpnessasadiagnosticsigninmrmammography AT kaiserannak valueofconstantsharpnessasadiagnosticsigninmrmammography AT krammerjulia valueofconstantsharpnessasadiagnosticsigninmrmammography AT udermichael valueofconstantsharpnessasadiagnosticsigninmrmammography AT kaiserwernera valueofconstantsharpnessasadiagnosticsigninmrmammography AT dietzelmatthias valueofconstantsharpnessasadiagnosticsigninmrmammography |