Cargando…

The value of “constant sharpness” as a diagnostic sign in MR-Mammography

PURPOSE: To examine “constant lesion sharpness” as a morphological diagnostic sign in the differential diagnosis between benign and malignant lesions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This prospective study had institutional review board approval and was HIPAA compliant. In total 1014 consecutive patients were...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaiser, Clemens G., Baltzer, Pascal, Kaiser, Anna K., Krammer, Julia, Uder, Michael, Kaiser, Werner A., Dietzel, Matthias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5009188/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27622201
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2016.08.004
_version_ 1782451489410646016
author Kaiser, Clemens G.
Baltzer, Pascal
Kaiser, Anna K.
Krammer, Julia
Uder, Michael
Kaiser, Werner A.
Dietzel, Matthias
author_facet Kaiser, Clemens G.
Baltzer, Pascal
Kaiser, Anna K.
Krammer, Julia
Uder, Michael
Kaiser, Werner A.
Dietzel, Matthias
author_sort Kaiser, Clemens G.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To examine “constant lesion sharpness” as a morphological diagnostic sign in the differential diagnosis between benign and malignant lesions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This prospective study had institutional review board approval and was HIPAA compliant. In total 1014 consecutive patients were examined (mean age 55 years ± 13 years) and evaluated in our University hospital towards the morphological shape of the lesion borders. The “Constant sharpness Sign” was defined as a lesion remaining continuously sharp for the duration of the dynamic scan. Inclusion criteria were unclear findings (e.g. BIRADS III/IV), Preoperative staging (BRIDAS IV/V), and referred patients from local clinic of gynecology. Exclusion criteria were MRM-examination ≤1 year before, status after surgery and/or biopsy, chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy. Reference Standard was histological verification. Images were diagnosed by two experienced radiologists in consensus, blinded to the standard of reference. RESULTS: 1014 patients with 1084 lesions (436 benign, 648 malignant lesions) were included into the study. 41.5% of benign lesions and 6.8% (181/436) of malignant lesions displayed a constant sharpness as an accompanying morphological sign (P < 0.001). This resulted in a sensitivity of 41.5%, specificity of 93.2%, a positive likelihood ratio of 6.1%, a negative likelihood ratio of 0.63 and an odd’s ratio of 9,7%. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION: The constant sharpness sign seems to be an accurate predictor of benign breast lesions, which may help to increase the accuracy of MRM as a morphological sign.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5009188
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50091882016-09-12 The value of “constant sharpness” as a diagnostic sign in MR-Mammography Kaiser, Clemens G. Baltzer, Pascal Kaiser, Anna K. Krammer, Julia Uder, Michael Kaiser, Werner A. Dietzel, Matthias Eur J Radiol Open Article PURPOSE: To examine “constant lesion sharpness” as a morphological diagnostic sign in the differential diagnosis between benign and malignant lesions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This prospective study had institutional review board approval and was HIPAA compliant. In total 1014 consecutive patients were examined (mean age 55 years ± 13 years) and evaluated in our University hospital towards the morphological shape of the lesion borders. The “Constant sharpness Sign” was defined as a lesion remaining continuously sharp for the duration of the dynamic scan. Inclusion criteria were unclear findings (e.g. BIRADS III/IV), Preoperative staging (BRIDAS IV/V), and referred patients from local clinic of gynecology. Exclusion criteria were MRM-examination ≤1 year before, status after surgery and/or biopsy, chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy. Reference Standard was histological verification. Images were diagnosed by two experienced radiologists in consensus, blinded to the standard of reference. RESULTS: 1014 patients with 1084 lesions (436 benign, 648 malignant lesions) were included into the study. 41.5% of benign lesions and 6.8% (181/436) of malignant lesions displayed a constant sharpness as an accompanying morphological sign (P < 0.001). This resulted in a sensitivity of 41.5%, specificity of 93.2%, a positive likelihood ratio of 6.1%, a negative likelihood ratio of 0.63 and an odd’s ratio of 9,7%. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION: The constant sharpness sign seems to be an accurate predictor of benign breast lesions, which may help to increase the accuracy of MRM as a morphological sign. Elsevier 2016-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5009188/ /pubmed/27622201 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2016.08.004 Text en © 2016 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kaiser, Clemens G.
Baltzer, Pascal
Kaiser, Anna K.
Krammer, Julia
Uder, Michael
Kaiser, Werner A.
Dietzel, Matthias
The value of “constant sharpness” as a diagnostic sign in MR-Mammography
title The value of “constant sharpness” as a diagnostic sign in MR-Mammography
title_full The value of “constant sharpness” as a diagnostic sign in MR-Mammography
title_fullStr The value of “constant sharpness” as a diagnostic sign in MR-Mammography
title_full_unstemmed The value of “constant sharpness” as a diagnostic sign in MR-Mammography
title_short The value of “constant sharpness” as a diagnostic sign in MR-Mammography
title_sort value of “constant sharpness” as a diagnostic sign in mr-mammography
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5009188/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27622201
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2016.08.004
work_keys_str_mv AT kaiserclemensg thevalueofconstantsharpnessasadiagnosticsigninmrmammography
AT baltzerpascal thevalueofconstantsharpnessasadiagnosticsigninmrmammography
AT kaiserannak thevalueofconstantsharpnessasadiagnosticsigninmrmammography
AT krammerjulia thevalueofconstantsharpnessasadiagnosticsigninmrmammography
AT udermichael thevalueofconstantsharpnessasadiagnosticsigninmrmammography
AT kaiserwernera thevalueofconstantsharpnessasadiagnosticsigninmrmammography
AT dietzelmatthias thevalueofconstantsharpnessasadiagnosticsigninmrmammography
AT kaiserclemensg valueofconstantsharpnessasadiagnosticsigninmrmammography
AT baltzerpascal valueofconstantsharpnessasadiagnosticsigninmrmammography
AT kaiserannak valueofconstantsharpnessasadiagnosticsigninmrmammography
AT krammerjulia valueofconstantsharpnessasadiagnosticsigninmrmammography
AT udermichael valueofconstantsharpnessasadiagnosticsigninmrmammography
AT kaiserwernera valueofconstantsharpnessasadiagnosticsigninmrmammography
AT dietzelmatthias valueofconstantsharpnessasadiagnosticsigninmrmammography