Cargando…

An important Supreme Court decision for the dental field

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Lee, Won
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	The Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons 2016
Materias:	Editorial
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5009189/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27595082 http://dx.doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2016.42.4.173

Ejemplares similares

Important Decision of the Supreme Court on Imitations
Publicado: (1883)

Supreme Judicial Court
Publicado: (1869)

The United States Supreme Court Decision in “Tooth Crowns”
Publicado: (1891)

A Supreme Court Decision
por: Chappell, J. A.
Publicado: (1899)

Supreme Court and the Practice of Oncology
por: Chabner, Bruce A, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in the Rubber Case
Publicado: (1873)

Relevant decisions of the Mexican Supreme Court /
Publicado: (2006)

US supreme court decision: the gastroenterological perspective
por: Lahat, Adi, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Supreme Court Decision: No. 67. October Term, 1880
por: McKenney, James H.
Publicado: (1881)

The Supreme Court in American history /
por: Fribourg, Marjorie G.
Publicado: (1969)

Law and legitimacy in the Supreme Court /
por: Fallon, Richard H., Jr., 1952-
Publicado: (2018)

Supreme Court of the United States
por: Middleton, D. W.
Publicado: (1877)

United States Supreme Court
Publicado: (1897)

Epidemiological evidence in law: a comment on Supreme Court Decision 2011Da22092, South Korea
por: Broadbent, Alex
Publicado: (2015)

Important Decision in Boston Court
Publicado: (1902)

Supreme Court Ruling - pay out for dentists?
Publicado: (2021)

The Hidden History of the Supreme Court and the Betrayal of America
por: Hartmann, Thom
Publicado: (2019)

The Importance of the International Community in Protecting the Right to Abortion: The Cases of Malta and of the US Supreme Court
por: Cioffi, Andrea, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Perceived Masculinity Predicts U.S. Supreme Court Outcomes
por: Chen, Daniel, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Justice Blocks and Predictability of U.S. Supreme Court Votes
por: Guimerà, Roger, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

US Supreme Court upholds abortion rights, for now
por: Jaffe, Susan
Publicado: (2020)

A dataset for predicting Supreme Court judgments in Nigeria
por: Ngige, O.C., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

After Myriad: Genetic Testing in the Wake of Recent Supreme Court Decisions about Gene Patents
por: Cook-Deegan, Robert, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Conceptual and Scientific Defects in the Supreme Court’s “Method of Execution” Jurisprudence
por: Dow, David R., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

The CMS Vaccine Mandate at the Supreme Court: A Hippocratic Imperative
por: Adashi, Eli Y., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Supreme Court State of New York: County of New York
por: Hamilton, Thomas L.
Publicado: (1904)

Supreme Court cases on affirmative action threaten diversity in medicine
por: Aaron, Daniel G., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Court Decision on Vaccination
Publicado: (1917)

“Remdesivir”: Decision of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation 27 May 2021 – Case No. АКПИ21-303
Publicado: (2021)

Society for Medical Anthropology Statement on Supreme Court Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization Decision
por: Buchbinder, Mara, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Disorders of sex development: The quintessence of perennial controversies-III - DSD, transgenders and the judgment by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India
por: Bajpai, M.
Publicado: (2015)

Implications and reflections on the 2010 Supreme Court ruling on Canada’s AHR Act
por: Deonandan, Raywat, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

The Benoni E. Gardner Appeal Case in the Supreme Court of the United States
Publicado: (1872)

A general approach for predicting the behavior of the Supreme Court of the United States
por: Katz, Daniel Martin, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Supreme Court 2019–2020: Insanity, Discrimination, and DACA—And a Pandemic
por: Smith, Steven R.
Publicado: (2020)

‘The “Strongest” Climate Ruling Yet’: The Dutch Supreme Court’s Urgenda Judgment
por: Spier, Jaap
Publicado: (2020)

The two-child limit for benefits in the Supreme Court: implications for public health
por: Machin, R
Publicado: (2021)

Supreme Court v. Necropolitics: The Chaotic Judicialization of COVID-19 in Brazil
por: Biehl, João, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Letter to the Editor: Prohibition, the Constitution, the Declaration of Independence, and the Supreme Court.—D.
por: Russell, K. C.
Publicado: (1911)

Forensic psychiatry in Pakistan: Where next following the Supreme Court judgement
por: Hassan, T.
Publicado: (2022)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_0mc1s2ff78427qc45abg417fbb