Cargando…

Are Temporal Differences in GDNF and NOS Isoform Induction Contributors to Neurodegeneration? A Fluorescence Microscopy-Based Study

BACKGROUND: Specific factors in Parkinson’s disease have become targets as to their protective and degenerative effects. We have demonstrated that cytokines and PD-CSF detrimentally affect microglia and astrocyte growth. While glial cell-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) has been recognized as a po...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Doursout, Marie-Francoise, Liang, Yangyan, Schiess, Mya C., Padilla, Angelica, Poindexter, Brian J., Hickson-Bick, Diane L. M., Bick, Roger J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bentham Open 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5009294/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27651844
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874205X01610010067
_version_ 1782451498244898816
author Doursout, Marie-Francoise
Liang, Yangyan
Schiess, Mya C.
Padilla, Angelica
Poindexter, Brian J.
Hickson-Bick, Diane L. M.
Bick, Roger J.
author_facet Doursout, Marie-Francoise
Liang, Yangyan
Schiess, Mya C.
Padilla, Angelica
Poindexter, Brian J.
Hickson-Bick, Diane L. M.
Bick, Roger J.
author_sort Doursout, Marie-Francoise
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Specific factors in Parkinson’s disease have become targets as to their protective and degenerative effects. We have demonstrated that cytokines and PD-CSF detrimentally affect microglia and astrocyte growth. While glial cell-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) has been recognized as a possible neuron-rescue agent, nitric oxide synthase (NOS) has been implicated in neurodegenerative processes. OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate that glial cell activation, cytokine production, and NOS induction, play an intimate role in the loss of dopaminergic signaling, via mechanisms that are a result of inflammation and inflammatory stimuli. METHODS: Study animals were sacrificed following endotoxin treatment and tissue sections were harvested and probed for GDNF and NOS isomers by fluorescence deconvolution microscopy. Fluorescence was mapped and quantified for each probe RESULTS: An immune cell influx into ‘vulnerable’ areas of the brain was seen, and three NOS isomers, inducible (iNOS), neuronal (nNOS) and endothelial (eNOS), were synthesized in the brains, a finding which suggests that each isomer has a role in neurodegeneration. eNOS was found associated with blood vessels, while iNOS was associated with glial and matrix cells and nNOS was located with both glia and neurons. Following endotoxin treatment, serum levels of nitric oxide were higher at 6-8 hours, while tissue levels of NOS were elevated for much longer. Thus, induction of NOS occurred earlier than the induction of GDNF. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that the protective abilities of GDNF to combat neural destruction are not available rapidly enough, and do not remain at sufficiently high levels long enough to assert its protective effects. (250).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5009294
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Bentham Open
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50092942016-09-20 Are Temporal Differences in GDNF and NOS Isoform Induction Contributors to Neurodegeneration? A Fluorescence Microscopy-Based Study Doursout, Marie-Francoise Liang, Yangyan Schiess, Mya C. Padilla, Angelica Poindexter, Brian J. Hickson-Bick, Diane L. M. Bick, Roger J. Open Neurol J Article BACKGROUND: Specific factors in Parkinson’s disease have become targets as to their protective and degenerative effects. We have demonstrated that cytokines and PD-CSF detrimentally affect microglia and astrocyte growth. While glial cell-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) has been recognized as a possible neuron-rescue agent, nitric oxide synthase (NOS) has been implicated in neurodegenerative processes. OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate that glial cell activation, cytokine production, and NOS induction, play an intimate role in the loss of dopaminergic signaling, via mechanisms that are a result of inflammation and inflammatory stimuli. METHODS: Study animals were sacrificed following endotoxin treatment and tissue sections were harvested and probed for GDNF and NOS isomers by fluorescence deconvolution microscopy. Fluorescence was mapped and quantified for each probe RESULTS: An immune cell influx into ‘vulnerable’ areas of the brain was seen, and three NOS isomers, inducible (iNOS), neuronal (nNOS) and endothelial (eNOS), were synthesized in the brains, a finding which suggests that each isomer has a role in neurodegeneration. eNOS was found associated with blood vessels, while iNOS was associated with glial and matrix cells and nNOS was located with both glia and neurons. Following endotoxin treatment, serum levels of nitric oxide were higher at 6-8 hours, while tissue levels of NOS were elevated for much longer. Thus, induction of NOS occurred earlier than the induction of GDNF. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that the protective abilities of GDNF to combat neural destruction are not available rapidly enough, and do not remain at sufficiently high levels long enough to assert its protective effects. (250). Bentham Open 2016-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5009294/ /pubmed/27651844 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874205X01610010067 Text en © Doursout et al.; Licensee Bentham Open. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial 4.0 International Public License (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode), which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Doursout, Marie-Francoise
Liang, Yangyan
Schiess, Mya C.
Padilla, Angelica
Poindexter, Brian J.
Hickson-Bick, Diane L. M.
Bick, Roger J.
Are Temporal Differences in GDNF and NOS Isoform Induction Contributors to Neurodegeneration? A Fluorescence Microscopy-Based Study
title Are Temporal Differences in GDNF and NOS Isoform Induction Contributors to Neurodegeneration? A Fluorescence Microscopy-Based Study
title_full Are Temporal Differences in GDNF and NOS Isoform Induction Contributors to Neurodegeneration? A Fluorescence Microscopy-Based Study
title_fullStr Are Temporal Differences in GDNF and NOS Isoform Induction Contributors to Neurodegeneration? A Fluorescence Microscopy-Based Study
title_full_unstemmed Are Temporal Differences in GDNF and NOS Isoform Induction Contributors to Neurodegeneration? A Fluorescence Microscopy-Based Study
title_short Are Temporal Differences in GDNF and NOS Isoform Induction Contributors to Neurodegeneration? A Fluorescence Microscopy-Based Study
title_sort are temporal differences in gdnf and nos isoform induction contributors to neurodegeneration? a fluorescence microscopy-based study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5009294/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27651844
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874205X01610010067
work_keys_str_mv AT doursoutmariefrancoise aretemporaldifferencesingdnfandnosisoforminductioncontributorstoneurodegenerationafluorescencemicroscopybasedstudy
AT liangyangyan aretemporaldifferencesingdnfandnosisoforminductioncontributorstoneurodegenerationafluorescencemicroscopybasedstudy
AT schiessmyac aretemporaldifferencesingdnfandnosisoforminductioncontributorstoneurodegenerationafluorescencemicroscopybasedstudy
AT padillaangelica aretemporaldifferencesingdnfandnosisoforminductioncontributorstoneurodegenerationafluorescencemicroscopybasedstudy
AT poindexterbrianj aretemporaldifferencesingdnfandnosisoforminductioncontributorstoneurodegenerationafluorescencemicroscopybasedstudy
AT hicksonbickdianelm aretemporaldifferencesingdnfandnosisoforminductioncontributorstoneurodegenerationafluorescencemicroscopybasedstudy
AT bickrogerj aretemporaldifferencesingdnfandnosisoforminductioncontributorstoneurodegenerationafluorescencemicroscopybasedstudy