Cargando…

Eave tubes for malaria control in Africa: a modelling assessment of potential impact on transmission

BACKGROUND: Novel interventions for malaria control are necessary in the face of problems such as increasing insecticide resistance and residual malaria transmission. One way to assess performance prior to deployment in the field is through mathematical modelling. Modelled here are a range of potent...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Waite, Jessica L., Lynch, Penelope A., Thomas, Matthew B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5009529/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27590602
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-016-1505-1
_version_ 1782451529463103488
author Waite, Jessica L.
Lynch, Penelope A.
Thomas, Matthew B.
author_facet Waite, Jessica L.
Lynch, Penelope A.
Thomas, Matthew B.
author_sort Waite, Jessica L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Novel interventions for malaria control are necessary in the face of problems such as increasing insecticide resistance and residual malaria transmission. One way to assess performance prior to deployment in the field is through mathematical modelling. Modelled here are a range of potential outcomes for eave tubes, a novel mosquito control tool combining house screening and targeted use of insecticides to provide both physical protection and turn the house into a lethal mosquito killing device. METHODS: The effect of eave tubes was modelled by estimating the reduction of infectious mosquito bites relative to no intervention (a transmission metric defined as relative transmission potential, RTP). The model was used to assess how RTP varied with coverage when eave tubes were used as a stand-alone intervention, or in combination with either bed nets (LLINs) or indoor residual spraying (IRS). RESULTS: The model indicated the impact of eave tubes on transmission increases non-linearly as coverage increases, suggesting a community level benefit. For example, based on realistic assumptions, just 30 % coverage resulted in around 70 % reduction in overall RTP (i.e. there was a benefit for those houses without eave tubes). Increasing coverage to around 70 % reduced overall RTP by >90 %. Eave tubes exhibited some redundancy with existing interventions, such that combining interventions within properties did not give reductions in RTP equal to the sum of those provided by deploying each intervention singly. However, combining eave tubes and either LLINs or IRS could be extremely effective if the technologies were deployed in a non-overlapping way. CONCLUSION: Using predictive models to assess the benefit of new technologies has great value, and is especially pertinent prior to conducting expensive, large scale, randomized controlled trials. The current modelling study indicates eave tubes have considerable potential to impact malaria transmission if deployed at scale and can be used effectively with existing tools, especially if they are combined strategically with, for example, IRS and eave tubes targeting different houses. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12936-016-1505-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5009529
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50095292016-09-03 Eave tubes for malaria control in Africa: a modelling assessment of potential impact on transmission Waite, Jessica L. Lynch, Penelope A. Thomas, Matthew B. Malar J Research BACKGROUND: Novel interventions for malaria control are necessary in the face of problems such as increasing insecticide resistance and residual malaria transmission. One way to assess performance prior to deployment in the field is through mathematical modelling. Modelled here are a range of potential outcomes for eave tubes, a novel mosquito control tool combining house screening and targeted use of insecticides to provide both physical protection and turn the house into a lethal mosquito killing device. METHODS: The effect of eave tubes was modelled by estimating the reduction of infectious mosquito bites relative to no intervention (a transmission metric defined as relative transmission potential, RTP). The model was used to assess how RTP varied with coverage when eave tubes were used as a stand-alone intervention, or in combination with either bed nets (LLINs) or indoor residual spraying (IRS). RESULTS: The model indicated the impact of eave tubes on transmission increases non-linearly as coverage increases, suggesting a community level benefit. For example, based on realistic assumptions, just 30 % coverage resulted in around 70 % reduction in overall RTP (i.e. there was a benefit for those houses without eave tubes). Increasing coverage to around 70 % reduced overall RTP by >90 %. Eave tubes exhibited some redundancy with existing interventions, such that combining interventions within properties did not give reductions in RTP equal to the sum of those provided by deploying each intervention singly. However, combining eave tubes and either LLINs or IRS could be extremely effective if the technologies were deployed in a non-overlapping way. CONCLUSION: Using predictive models to assess the benefit of new technologies has great value, and is especially pertinent prior to conducting expensive, large scale, randomized controlled trials. The current modelling study indicates eave tubes have considerable potential to impact malaria transmission if deployed at scale and can be used effectively with existing tools, especially if they are combined strategically with, for example, IRS and eave tubes targeting different houses. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12936-016-1505-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-09-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5009529/ /pubmed/27590602 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-016-1505-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Waite, Jessica L.
Lynch, Penelope A.
Thomas, Matthew B.
Eave tubes for malaria control in Africa: a modelling assessment of potential impact on transmission
title Eave tubes for malaria control in Africa: a modelling assessment of potential impact on transmission
title_full Eave tubes for malaria control in Africa: a modelling assessment of potential impact on transmission
title_fullStr Eave tubes for malaria control in Africa: a modelling assessment of potential impact on transmission
title_full_unstemmed Eave tubes for malaria control in Africa: a modelling assessment of potential impact on transmission
title_short Eave tubes for malaria control in Africa: a modelling assessment of potential impact on transmission
title_sort eave tubes for malaria control in africa: a modelling assessment of potential impact on transmission
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5009529/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27590602
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-016-1505-1
work_keys_str_mv AT waitejessical eavetubesformalariacontrolinafricaamodellingassessmentofpotentialimpactontransmission
AT lynchpenelopea eavetubesformalariacontrolinafricaamodellingassessmentofpotentialimpactontransmission
AT thomasmatthewb eavetubesformalariacontrolinafricaamodellingassessmentofpotentialimpactontransmission