Cargando…
Eave tubes for malaria control in Africa: initial development and semi-field evaluations in Tanzania
BACKGROUND: Presented here are a series of preliminary experiments evaluating “eave tubes”—a technology that combines house screening with a novel method of delivering insecticides for control of malaria mosquitoes. METHODS: Eave tubes were first evaluated with overnight release and recapture of mos...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5009540/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27586055 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-016-1499-8 |
_version_ | 1782451531788845056 |
---|---|
author | Sternberg, Eleanore D. Ng’habi, Kija R. Lyimo, Issa N. Kessy, Stella T. Farenhorst, Marit Thomas, Matthew B. Knols, Bart G. J. Mnyone, Ladslaus L. |
author_facet | Sternberg, Eleanore D. Ng’habi, Kija R. Lyimo, Issa N. Kessy, Stella T. Farenhorst, Marit Thomas, Matthew B. Knols, Bart G. J. Mnyone, Ladslaus L. |
author_sort | Sternberg, Eleanore D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Presented here are a series of preliminary experiments evaluating “eave tubes”—a technology that combines house screening with a novel method of delivering insecticides for control of malaria mosquitoes. METHODS: Eave tubes were first evaluated with overnight release and recapture of mosquitoes in a screened compartment containing a hut and human sleeper. Recapture numbers were used as a proxy for overnight survival. These trials tested physical characteristics of the eave tubes (height, diameter, angle), and different active ingredients (bendiocarb, LLIN material, fungus). Eave tubes in a hut with closed eaves were also compared to an LLIN protecting a sleeper in a hut with open eaves. Eave tubes were then evaluated in a larger compartment containing a self-replicating mosquito population, vegetation, and multiple houses and cattle sheds. In this “model village”, LLINs were introduced first, followed by eave tubes and associated house modifications. RESULTS: Initial testing suggested that tubes placed horizontally and at eave height had the biggest impact on mosquito recapture relative to respective controls. Comparison of active ingredients suggested roughly equivalent effects from bendiocarb, LLIN material, and fungal spores (although speed of kill was slower for fungus). The impact of treated netting on recapture rates ranged from 50 to 70 % reduction relative to controls. In subsequent experiments comparing bendiocarb-treated netting in eave tubes against a standard LLIN, the effect size was smaller but the eave tubes with closed eaves performed at least as well as the LLIN with open eaves. In the model village, introducing LLINs led to an approximate 60 % reduction in larval densities and 85 % reduction in indoor catches of host-seeking mosquitoes relative to pre-intervention values. Installing eave tubes and screening further reduced larval density (93 % relative to pre intervention values) and virtually eliminated indoor host-seeking mosquitoes. When the eave tubes and screening were removed, larval and adult catches recovered to pre-eave tube levels. CONCLUSIONS: These trials suggest that the “eave tube” package can impact overnight survival of host-seeking mosquitoes and can suppress mosquito populations, even in a complex environment. Further testing is now required to evaluate the robustness of these findings and demonstrate impact under field conditions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5009540 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50095402016-09-03 Eave tubes for malaria control in Africa: initial development and semi-field evaluations in Tanzania Sternberg, Eleanore D. Ng’habi, Kija R. Lyimo, Issa N. Kessy, Stella T. Farenhorst, Marit Thomas, Matthew B. Knols, Bart G. J. Mnyone, Ladslaus L. Malar J Research BACKGROUND: Presented here are a series of preliminary experiments evaluating “eave tubes”—a technology that combines house screening with a novel method of delivering insecticides for control of malaria mosquitoes. METHODS: Eave tubes were first evaluated with overnight release and recapture of mosquitoes in a screened compartment containing a hut and human sleeper. Recapture numbers were used as a proxy for overnight survival. These trials tested physical characteristics of the eave tubes (height, diameter, angle), and different active ingredients (bendiocarb, LLIN material, fungus). Eave tubes in a hut with closed eaves were also compared to an LLIN protecting a sleeper in a hut with open eaves. Eave tubes were then evaluated in a larger compartment containing a self-replicating mosquito population, vegetation, and multiple houses and cattle sheds. In this “model village”, LLINs were introduced first, followed by eave tubes and associated house modifications. RESULTS: Initial testing suggested that tubes placed horizontally and at eave height had the biggest impact on mosquito recapture relative to respective controls. Comparison of active ingredients suggested roughly equivalent effects from bendiocarb, LLIN material, and fungal spores (although speed of kill was slower for fungus). The impact of treated netting on recapture rates ranged from 50 to 70 % reduction relative to controls. In subsequent experiments comparing bendiocarb-treated netting in eave tubes against a standard LLIN, the effect size was smaller but the eave tubes with closed eaves performed at least as well as the LLIN with open eaves. In the model village, introducing LLINs led to an approximate 60 % reduction in larval densities and 85 % reduction in indoor catches of host-seeking mosquitoes relative to pre-intervention values. Installing eave tubes and screening further reduced larval density (93 % relative to pre intervention values) and virtually eliminated indoor host-seeking mosquitoes. When the eave tubes and screening were removed, larval and adult catches recovered to pre-eave tube levels. CONCLUSIONS: These trials suggest that the “eave tube” package can impact overnight survival of host-seeking mosquitoes and can suppress mosquito populations, even in a complex environment. Further testing is now required to evaluate the robustness of these findings and demonstrate impact under field conditions. BioMed Central 2016-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5009540/ /pubmed/27586055 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-016-1499-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Sternberg, Eleanore D. Ng’habi, Kija R. Lyimo, Issa N. Kessy, Stella T. Farenhorst, Marit Thomas, Matthew B. Knols, Bart G. J. Mnyone, Ladslaus L. Eave tubes for malaria control in Africa: initial development and semi-field evaluations in Tanzania |
title | Eave tubes for malaria control in Africa: initial development and semi-field evaluations in Tanzania |
title_full | Eave tubes for malaria control in Africa: initial development and semi-field evaluations in Tanzania |
title_fullStr | Eave tubes for malaria control in Africa: initial development and semi-field evaluations in Tanzania |
title_full_unstemmed | Eave tubes for malaria control in Africa: initial development and semi-field evaluations in Tanzania |
title_short | Eave tubes for malaria control in Africa: initial development and semi-field evaluations in Tanzania |
title_sort | eave tubes for malaria control in africa: initial development and semi-field evaluations in tanzania |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5009540/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27586055 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-016-1499-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sternbergeleanored eavetubesformalariacontrolinafricainitialdevelopmentandsemifieldevaluationsintanzania AT nghabikijar eavetubesformalariacontrolinafricainitialdevelopmentandsemifieldevaluationsintanzania AT lyimoissan eavetubesformalariacontrolinafricainitialdevelopmentandsemifieldevaluationsintanzania AT kessystellat eavetubesformalariacontrolinafricainitialdevelopmentandsemifieldevaluationsintanzania AT farenhorstmarit eavetubesformalariacontrolinafricainitialdevelopmentandsemifieldevaluationsintanzania AT thomasmatthewb eavetubesformalariacontrolinafricainitialdevelopmentandsemifieldevaluationsintanzania AT knolsbartgj eavetubesformalariacontrolinafricainitialdevelopmentandsemifieldevaluationsintanzania AT mnyoneladslausl eavetubesformalariacontrolinafricainitialdevelopmentandsemifieldevaluationsintanzania |