Cargando…

Five-year clinical outcomes in patients with diabetes mellitus treated with polymer-free sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stents versus second-generation zotarolimus-eluting stents: a subgroup analysis of a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Improved outcomes in patients with diabetes mellitus undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention remain an unmet clinical need. We assessed the long-term efficacy and safety of novel polymer-free sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stent in diabetic patients enrolled in intracoronary stent...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harada, Yukinori, Colleran, Roisin, Kufner, Sebastian, Giacoppo, Daniele, Rheude, Tobias, Michel, Jonathan, Cassese, Salvatore, Ibrahim, Tareq, Laugwitz, Karl-Ludwig, Kastrati, Adnan, Byrne, Robert A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5009646/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27586678
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12933-016-0429-y
_version_ 1782451551533531136
author Harada, Yukinori
Colleran, Roisin
Kufner, Sebastian
Giacoppo, Daniele
Rheude, Tobias
Michel, Jonathan
Cassese, Salvatore
Ibrahim, Tareq
Laugwitz, Karl-Ludwig
Kastrati, Adnan
Byrne, Robert A.
author_facet Harada, Yukinori
Colleran, Roisin
Kufner, Sebastian
Giacoppo, Daniele
Rheude, Tobias
Michel, Jonathan
Cassese, Salvatore
Ibrahim, Tareq
Laugwitz, Karl-Ludwig
Kastrati, Adnan
Byrne, Robert A.
author_sort Harada, Yukinori
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Improved outcomes in patients with diabetes mellitus undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention remain an unmet clinical need. We assessed the long-term efficacy and safety of novel polymer-free sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stent in diabetic patients enrolled in intracoronary stenting and angiographic results: test efficacy of sirolimus- and probucol-eluting versus zotarolimus-eluting stents 5 trial. METHODS: In a pre-specified subgroup analysis, outcomes of diabetic patients treated with a sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stent or a second-generation zotarolimus-eluting stent were compared. The primary endpoint was a device-oriented composite outcome comprising cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction (MI), or target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 5-year follow-up. Event-free survival was assessed using the Kaplan–Meier method. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were estimated from univariate Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: A total of 870 patients with diabetes mellitus were treated with either a sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stent (n = 575) or a second-generation zotarolimus-eluting stent (n = 295). At 5 years, the rate of device-oriented composite endpoint was comparable between the sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stent and the second-generation zotarolimus-eluting stent (32.9 versus 33.4 %, HR 0.88, 95 % CI 0.76–1.26). No significant differences were observed between the sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stent and the second-generation zotarolimus-eluting stent groups in the incidence of cardiac death (15.6 versus 16.7 % HR 0.92, 95 % CI 0.63–1.32), target-vessel MI (4.6 versus 6.6 %, HR 0.73, 95 % CI 0.40–1.34), and TLR (18.6 versus 18.8 %, HR 1.00, 95 % CI, 0.72–1.41). The rate of definite or probable stent thrombosis was low and similar in both groups (2.5 versus 2.6 %, HR 1.02, 95 % CI, 0.41–2.52). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with diabetes the long-term efficacy and safety of a polymer-free sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stent were comparable to a second-generation durable polymer zotarolimus-eluting stent. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00598533. Registered 10 January 2008
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5009646
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50096462016-09-03 Five-year clinical outcomes in patients with diabetes mellitus treated with polymer-free sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stents versus second-generation zotarolimus-eluting stents: a subgroup analysis of a randomized controlled trial Harada, Yukinori Colleran, Roisin Kufner, Sebastian Giacoppo, Daniele Rheude, Tobias Michel, Jonathan Cassese, Salvatore Ibrahim, Tareq Laugwitz, Karl-Ludwig Kastrati, Adnan Byrne, Robert A. Cardiovasc Diabetol Original Investigation BACKGROUND: Improved outcomes in patients with diabetes mellitus undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention remain an unmet clinical need. We assessed the long-term efficacy and safety of novel polymer-free sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stent in diabetic patients enrolled in intracoronary stenting and angiographic results: test efficacy of sirolimus- and probucol-eluting versus zotarolimus-eluting stents 5 trial. METHODS: In a pre-specified subgroup analysis, outcomes of diabetic patients treated with a sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stent or a second-generation zotarolimus-eluting stent were compared. The primary endpoint was a device-oriented composite outcome comprising cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction (MI), or target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 5-year follow-up. Event-free survival was assessed using the Kaplan–Meier method. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were estimated from univariate Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: A total of 870 patients with diabetes mellitus were treated with either a sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stent (n = 575) or a second-generation zotarolimus-eluting stent (n = 295). At 5 years, the rate of device-oriented composite endpoint was comparable between the sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stent and the second-generation zotarolimus-eluting stent (32.9 versus 33.4 %, HR 0.88, 95 % CI 0.76–1.26). No significant differences were observed between the sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stent and the second-generation zotarolimus-eluting stent groups in the incidence of cardiac death (15.6 versus 16.7 % HR 0.92, 95 % CI 0.63–1.32), target-vessel MI (4.6 versus 6.6 %, HR 0.73, 95 % CI 0.40–1.34), and TLR (18.6 versus 18.8 %, HR 1.00, 95 % CI, 0.72–1.41). The rate of definite or probable stent thrombosis was low and similar in both groups (2.5 versus 2.6 %, HR 1.02, 95 % CI, 0.41–2.52). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with diabetes the long-term efficacy and safety of a polymer-free sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stent were comparable to a second-generation durable polymer zotarolimus-eluting stent. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00598533. Registered 10 January 2008 BioMed Central 2016-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5009646/ /pubmed/27586678 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12933-016-0429-y Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Harada, Yukinori
Colleran, Roisin
Kufner, Sebastian
Giacoppo, Daniele
Rheude, Tobias
Michel, Jonathan
Cassese, Salvatore
Ibrahim, Tareq
Laugwitz, Karl-Ludwig
Kastrati, Adnan
Byrne, Robert A.
Five-year clinical outcomes in patients with diabetes mellitus treated with polymer-free sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stents versus second-generation zotarolimus-eluting stents: a subgroup analysis of a randomized controlled trial
title Five-year clinical outcomes in patients with diabetes mellitus treated with polymer-free sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stents versus second-generation zotarolimus-eluting stents: a subgroup analysis of a randomized controlled trial
title_full Five-year clinical outcomes in patients with diabetes mellitus treated with polymer-free sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stents versus second-generation zotarolimus-eluting stents: a subgroup analysis of a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Five-year clinical outcomes in patients with diabetes mellitus treated with polymer-free sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stents versus second-generation zotarolimus-eluting stents: a subgroup analysis of a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Five-year clinical outcomes in patients with diabetes mellitus treated with polymer-free sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stents versus second-generation zotarolimus-eluting stents: a subgroup analysis of a randomized controlled trial
title_short Five-year clinical outcomes in patients with diabetes mellitus treated with polymer-free sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stents versus second-generation zotarolimus-eluting stents: a subgroup analysis of a randomized controlled trial
title_sort five-year clinical outcomes in patients with diabetes mellitus treated with polymer-free sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stents versus second-generation zotarolimus-eluting stents: a subgroup analysis of a randomized controlled trial
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5009646/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27586678
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12933-016-0429-y
work_keys_str_mv AT haradayukinori fiveyearclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithdiabetesmellitustreatedwithpolymerfreesirolimusandprobucolelutingstentsversussecondgenerationzotarolimuselutingstentsasubgroupanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT colleranroisin fiveyearclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithdiabetesmellitustreatedwithpolymerfreesirolimusandprobucolelutingstentsversussecondgenerationzotarolimuselutingstentsasubgroupanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kufnersebastian fiveyearclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithdiabetesmellitustreatedwithpolymerfreesirolimusandprobucolelutingstentsversussecondgenerationzotarolimuselutingstentsasubgroupanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT giacoppodaniele fiveyearclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithdiabetesmellitustreatedwithpolymerfreesirolimusandprobucolelutingstentsversussecondgenerationzotarolimuselutingstentsasubgroupanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT rheudetobias fiveyearclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithdiabetesmellitustreatedwithpolymerfreesirolimusandprobucolelutingstentsversussecondgenerationzotarolimuselutingstentsasubgroupanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT micheljonathan fiveyearclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithdiabetesmellitustreatedwithpolymerfreesirolimusandprobucolelutingstentsversussecondgenerationzotarolimuselutingstentsasubgroupanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT cassesesalvatore fiveyearclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithdiabetesmellitustreatedwithpolymerfreesirolimusandprobucolelutingstentsversussecondgenerationzotarolimuselutingstentsasubgroupanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ibrahimtareq fiveyearclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithdiabetesmellitustreatedwithpolymerfreesirolimusandprobucolelutingstentsversussecondgenerationzotarolimuselutingstentsasubgroupanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT laugwitzkarlludwig fiveyearclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithdiabetesmellitustreatedwithpolymerfreesirolimusandprobucolelutingstentsversussecondgenerationzotarolimuselutingstentsasubgroupanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kastratiadnan fiveyearclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithdiabetesmellitustreatedwithpolymerfreesirolimusandprobucolelutingstentsversussecondgenerationzotarolimuselutingstentsasubgroupanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT byrneroberta fiveyearclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithdiabetesmellitustreatedwithpolymerfreesirolimusandprobucolelutingstentsversussecondgenerationzotarolimuselutingstentsasubgroupanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT fiveyearclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithdiabetesmellitustreatedwithpolymerfreesirolimusandprobucolelutingstentsversussecondgenerationzotarolimuselutingstentsasubgroupanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial