Cargando…
Five-year clinical outcomes in patients with diabetes mellitus treated with polymer-free sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stents versus second-generation zotarolimus-eluting stents: a subgroup analysis of a randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Improved outcomes in patients with diabetes mellitus undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention remain an unmet clinical need. We assessed the long-term efficacy and safety of novel polymer-free sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stent in diabetic patients enrolled in intracoronary stent...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5009646/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27586678 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12933-016-0429-y |
_version_ | 1782451551533531136 |
---|---|
author | Harada, Yukinori Colleran, Roisin Kufner, Sebastian Giacoppo, Daniele Rheude, Tobias Michel, Jonathan Cassese, Salvatore Ibrahim, Tareq Laugwitz, Karl-Ludwig Kastrati, Adnan Byrne, Robert A. |
author_facet | Harada, Yukinori Colleran, Roisin Kufner, Sebastian Giacoppo, Daniele Rheude, Tobias Michel, Jonathan Cassese, Salvatore Ibrahim, Tareq Laugwitz, Karl-Ludwig Kastrati, Adnan Byrne, Robert A. |
author_sort | Harada, Yukinori |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Improved outcomes in patients with diabetes mellitus undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention remain an unmet clinical need. We assessed the long-term efficacy and safety of novel polymer-free sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stent in diabetic patients enrolled in intracoronary stenting and angiographic results: test efficacy of sirolimus- and probucol-eluting versus zotarolimus-eluting stents 5 trial. METHODS: In a pre-specified subgroup analysis, outcomes of diabetic patients treated with a sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stent or a second-generation zotarolimus-eluting stent were compared. The primary endpoint was a device-oriented composite outcome comprising cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction (MI), or target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 5-year follow-up. Event-free survival was assessed using the Kaplan–Meier method. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were estimated from univariate Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: A total of 870 patients with diabetes mellitus were treated with either a sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stent (n = 575) or a second-generation zotarolimus-eluting stent (n = 295). At 5 years, the rate of device-oriented composite endpoint was comparable between the sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stent and the second-generation zotarolimus-eluting stent (32.9 versus 33.4 %, HR 0.88, 95 % CI 0.76–1.26). No significant differences were observed between the sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stent and the second-generation zotarolimus-eluting stent groups in the incidence of cardiac death (15.6 versus 16.7 % HR 0.92, 95 % CI 0.63–1.32), target-vessel MI (4.6 versus 6.6 %, HR 0.73, 95 % CI 0.40–1.34), and TLR (18.6 versus 18.8 %, HR 1.00, 95 % CI, 0.72–1.41). The rate of definite or probable stent thrombosis was low and similar in both groups (2.5 versus 2.6 %, HR 1.02, 95 % CI, 0.41–2.52). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with diabetes the long-term efficacy and safety of a polymer-free sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stent were comparable to a second-generation durable polymer zotarolimus-eluting stent. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00598533. Registered 10 January 2008 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5009646 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50096462016-09-03 Five-year clinical outcomes in patients with diabetes mellitus treated with polymer-free sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stents versus second-generation zotarolimus-eluting stents: a subgroup analysis of a randomized controlled trial Harada, Yukinori Colleran, Roisin Kufner, Sebastian Giacoppo, Daniele Rheude, Tobias Michel, Jonathan Cassese, Salvatore Ibrahim, Tareq Laugwitz, Karl-Ludwig Kastrati, Adnan Byrne, Robert A. Cardiovasc Diabetol Original Investigation BACKGROUND: Improved outcomes in patients with diabetes mellitus undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention remain an unmet clinical need. We assessed the long-term efficacy and safety of novel polymer-free sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stent in diabetic patients enrolled in intracoronary stenting and angiographic results: test efficacy of sirolimus- and probucol-eluting versus zotarolimus-eluting stents 5 trial. METHODS: In a pre-specified subgroup analysis, outcomes of diabetic patients treated with a sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stent or a second-generation zotarolimus-eluting stent were compared. The primary endpoint was a device-oriented composite outcome comprising cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction (MI), or target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 5-year follow-up. Event-free survival was assessed using the Kaplan–Meier method. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were estimated from univariate Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: A total of 870 patients with diabetes mellitus were treated with either a sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stent (n = 575) or a second-generation zotarolimus-eluting stent (n = 295). At 5 years, the rate of device-oriented composite endpoint was comparable between the sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stent and the second-generation zotarolimus-eluting stent (32.9 versus 33.4 %, HR 0.88, 95 % CI 0.76–1.26). No significant differences were observed between the sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stent and the second-generation zotarolimus-eluting stent groups in the incidence of cardiac death (15.6 versus 16.7 % HR 0.92, 95 % CI 0.63–1.32), target-vessel MI (4.6 versus 6.6 %, HR 0.73, 95 % CI 0.40–1.34), and TLR (18.6 versus 18.8 %, HR 1.00, 95 % CI, 0.72–1.41). The rate of definite or probable stent thrombosis was low and similar in both groups (2.5 versus 2.6 %, HR 1.02, 95 % CI, 0.41–2.52). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with diabetes the long-term efficacy and safety of a polymer-free sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stent were comparable to a second-generation durable polymer zotarolimus-eluting stent. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00598533. Registered 10 January 2008 BioMed Central 2016-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5009646/ /pubmed/27586678 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12933-016-0429-y Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Original Investigation Harada, Yukinori Colleran, Roisin Kufner, Sebastian Giacoppo, Daniele Rheude, Tobias Michel, Jonathan Cassese, Salvatore Ibrahim, Tareq Laugwitz, Karl-Ludwig Kastrati, Adnan Byrne, Robert A. Five-year clinical outcomes in patients with diabetes mellitus treated with polymer-free sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stents versus second-generation zotarolimus-eluting stents: a subgroup analysis of a randomized controlled trial |
title | Five-year clinical outcomes in patients with diabetes mellitus treated with polymer-free sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stents versus second-generation zotarolimus-eluting stents: a subgroup analysis of a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Five-year clinical outcomes in patients with diabetes mellitus treated with polymer-free sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stents versus second-generation zotarolimus-eluting stents: a subgroup analysis of a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Five-year clinical outcomes in patients with diabetes mellitus treated with polymer-free sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stents versus second-generation zotarolimus-eluting stents: a subgroup analysis of a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Five-year clinical outcomes in patients with diabetes mellitus treated with polymer-free sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stents versus second-generation zotarolimus-eluting stents: a subgroup analysis of a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Five-year clinical outcomes in patients with diabetes mellitus treated with polymer-free sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stents versus second-generation zotarolimus-eluting stents: a subgroup analysis of a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | five-year clinical outcomes in patients with diabetes mellitus treated with polymer-free sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stents versus second-generation zotarolimus-eluting stents: a subgroup analysis of a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Original Investigation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5009646/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27586678 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12933-016-0429-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT haradayukinori fiveyearclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithdiabetesmellitustreatedwithpolymerfreesirolimusandprobucolelutingstentsversussecondgenerationzotarolimuselutingstentsasubgroupanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT colleranroisin fiveyearclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithdiabetesmellitustreatedwithpolymerfreesirolimusandprobucolelutingstentsversussecondgenerationzotarolimuselutingstentsasubgroupanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kufnersebastian fiveyearclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithdiabetesmellitustreatedwithpolymerfreesirolimusandprobucolelutingstentsversussecondgenerationzotarolimuselutingstentsasubgroupanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT giacoppodaniele fiveyearclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithdiabetesmellitustreatedwithpolymerfreesirolimusandprobucolelutingstentsversussecondgenerationzotarolimuselutingstentsasubgroupanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT rheudetobias fiveyearclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithdiabetesmellitustreatedwithpolymerfreesirolimusandprobucolelutingstentsversussecondgenerationzotarolimuselutingstentsasubgroupanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT micheljonathan fiveyearclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithdiabetesmellitustreatedwithpolymerfreesirolimusandprobucolelutingstentsversussecondgenerationzotarolimuselutingstentsasubgroupanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT cassesesalvatore fiveyearclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithdiabetesmellitustreatedwithpolymerfreesirolimusandprobucolelutingstentsversussecondgenerationzotarolimuselutingstentsasubgroupanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT ibrahimtareq fiveyearclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithdiabetesmellitustreatedwithpolymerfreesirolimusandprobucolelutingstentsversussecondgenerationzotarolimuselutingstentsasubgroupanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT laugwitzkarlludwig fiveyearclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithdiabetesmellitustreatedwithpolymerfreesirolimusandprobucolelutingstentsversussecondgenerationzotarolimuselutingstentsasubgroupanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kastratiadnan fiveyearclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithdiabetesmellitustreatedwithpolymerfreesirolimusandprobucolelutingstentsversussecondgenerationzotarolimuselutingstentsasubgroupanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT byrneroberta fiveyearclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithdiabetesmellitustreatedwithpolymerfreesirolimusandprobucolelutingstentsversussecondgenerationzotarolimuselutingstentsasubgroupanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT fiveyearclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithdiabetesmellitustreatedwithpolymerfreesirolimusandprobucolelutingstentsversussecondgenerationzotarolimuselutingstentsasubgroupanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial |