Cargando…

A comparative study on the efficacies of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist and GnRH antagonist in neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy combined with transperineal prostate brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) has been suggested to confer several clinical benefits in patients with prostate cancer (PCa) undergoing transperineal prostate brachytherapy (TPPB). Unlike gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor agonists, a GnRH antagonist such as d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miki, Kenta, Sasaki, Hiroshi, Kido, Masahito, Takahashi, Hiroyuki, Aoki, Manabu, Egawa, Shin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5009655/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27586506
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2737-8
_version_ 1782451553638023168
author Miki, Kenta
Sasaki, Hiroshi
Kido, Masahito
Takahashi, Hiroyuki
Aoki, Manabu
Egawa, Shin
author_facet Miki, Kenta
Sasaki, Hiroshi
Kido, Masahito
Takahashi, Hiroyuki
Aoki, Manabu
Egawa, Shin
author_sort Miki, Kenta
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) has been suggested to confer several clinical benefits in patients with prostate cancer (PCa) undergoing transperineal prostate brachytherapy (TPPB). Unlike gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor agonists, a GnRH antagonist such as degarelix can achieve castrate levels of testosterone without testosterone flare. However, normalization of serum testosterone levels following completion of neoadjuvant ADT in either form of treatment has never been compared in clinical trials. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a single-center, open-label, randomized controlled study that will compare the efficacy and safety of degarelix with those of existing GnRH agonists combined with (125)I-TPPB. A total of 56 patients with low/intermediate-risk clinically localized PCa will be enrolled and randomized to one of two treatment groups: the GnRH agonist group and the degarelix group. Patients in the GnRH agonist group will receive leuprorelin acetate or goserelin acetate, and those in the degarelix group will receive the initial dose of 240 mg as 2 subcutaneous injections of 120 mg each, and then 80 mg of maintenance doses every 4 weeks for 12 weeks. Those randomly assigned to the 12-week intervention period will subsequently undergo 48-weeks of follow-up after (125)I-TPPB. The primary endpoint is defined as normalization of serum testosterone levels (>50 ng/dL) following completion of neoadjuvant ADT. All patients will be assessed every 4 weeks for the first 24 weeks, then every 12 weeks for the next 36 weeks after administrations of these drugs. Secondary endpoints are the proportion of normalized serum luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), the percent reduction in prostate specific antigen (PSA) compared with pretreatment levels, the percent reduction in total prostate volume (TPV) during neoadjuvant ADT, the percent increase in TPV after (125)I-TPPB, the percent reduction in hemoglobin, serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP), changes in free testosterone and bone mineral content measurement, the proportion of patients who have serum testosterone levels over 50 ng/dL at 12 weeks following completion of neoadjuvant ADT, and the improvement of quality of life (QOL). DISCUSSION: The present study will provide additional insight regarding the benefit and potency of degarelix and will examine its potential as a new option for administration in neoadjuvant ADT. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Identification number: UMIN000015519. Registration date: October 24, 2014.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5009655
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50096552016-09-03 A comparative study on the efficacies of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist and GnRH antagonist in neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy combined with transperineal prostate brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer Miki, Kenta Sasaki, Hiroshi Kido, Masahito Takahashi, Hiroyuki Aoki, Manabu Egawa, Shin BMC Cancer Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) has been suggested to confer several clinical benefits in patients with prostate cancer (PCa) undergoing transperineal prostate brachytherapy (TPPB). Unlike gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor agonists, a GnRH antagonist such as degarelix can achieve castrate levels of testosterone without testosterone flare. However, normalization of serum testosterone levels following completion of neoadjuvant ADT in either form of treatment has never been compared in clinical trials. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a single-center, open-label, randomized controlled study that will compare the efficacy and safety of degarelix with those of existing GnRH agonists combined with (125)I-TPPB. A total of 56 patients with low/intermediate-risk clinically localized PCa will be enrolled and randomized to one of two treatment groups: the GnRH agonist group and the degarelix group. Patients in the GnRH agonist group will receive leuprorelin acetate or goserelin acetate, and those in the degarelix group will receive the initial dose of 240 mg as 2 subcutaneous injections of 120 mg each, and then 80 mg of maintenance doses every 4 weeks for 12 weeks. Those randomly assigned to the 12-week intervention period will subsequently undergo 48-weeks of follow-up after (125)I-TPPB. The primary endpoint is defined as normalization of serum testosterone levels (>50 ng/dL) following completion of neoadjuvant ADT. All patients will be assessed every 4 weeks for the first 24 weeks, then every 12 weeks for the next 36 weeks after administrations of these drugs. Secondary endpoints are the proportion of normalized serum luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), the percent reduction in prostate specific antigen (PSA) compared with pretreatment levels, the percent reduction in total prostate volume (TPV) during neoadjuvant ADT, the percent increase in TPV after (125)I-TPPB, the percent reduction in hemoglobin, serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP), changes in free testosterone and bone mineral content measurement, the proportion of patients who have serum testosterone levels over 50 ng/dL at 12 weeks following completion of neoadjuvant ADT, and the improvement of quality of life (QOL). DISCUSSION: The present study will provide additional insight regarding the benefit and potency of degarelix and will examine its potential as a new option for administration in neoadjuvant ADT. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Identification number: UMIN000015519. Registration date: October 24, 2014. BioMed Central 2016-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5009655/ /pubmed/27586506 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2737-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Miki, Kenta
Sasaki, Hiroshi
Kido, Masahito
Takahashi, Hiroyuki
Aoki, Manabu
Egawa, Shin
A comparative study on the efficacies of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist and GnRH antagonist in neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy combined with transperineal prostate brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer
title A comparative study on the efficacies of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist and GnRH antagonist in neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy combined with transperineal prostate brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer
title_full A comparative study on the efficacies of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist and GnRH antagonist in neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy combined with transperineal prostate brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer
title_fullStr A comparative study on the efficacies of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist and GnRH antagonist in neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy combined with transperineal prostate brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer
title_full_unstemmed A comparative study on the efficacies of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist and GnRH antagonist in neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy combined with transperineal prostate brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer
title_short A comparative study on the efficacies of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist and GnRH antagonist in neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy combined with transperineal prostate brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer
title_sort comparative study on the efficacies of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (gnrh) agonist and gnrh antagonist in neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy combined with transperineal prostate brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5009655/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27586506
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2737-8
work_keys_str_mv AT mikikenta acomparativestudyontheefficaciesofgonadotropinreleasinghormonegnrhagonistandgnrhantagonistinneoadjuvantandrogendeprivationtherapycombinedwithtransperinealprostatebrachytherapyforlocalizedprostatecancer
AT sasakihiroshi acomparativestudyontheefficaciesofgonadotropinreleasinghormonegnrhagonistandgnrhantagonistinneoadjuvantandrogendeprivationtherapycombinedwithtransperinealprostatebrachytherapyforlocalizedprostatecancer
AT kidomasahito acomparativestudyontheefficaciesofgonadotropinreleasinghormonegnrhagonistandgnrhantagonistinneoadjuvantandrogendeprivationtherapycombinedwithtransperinealprostatebrachytherapyforlocalizedprostatecancer
AT takahashihiroyuki acomparativestudyontheefficaciesofgonadotropinreleasinghormonegnrhagonistandgnrhantagonistinneoadjuvantandrogendeprivationtherapycombinedwithtransperinealprostatebrachytherapyforlocalizedprostatecancer
AT aokimanabu acomparativestudyontheefficaciesofgonadotropinreleasinghormonegnrhagonistandgnrhantagonistinneoadjuvantandrogendeprivationtherapycombinedwithtransperinealprostatebrachytherapyforlocalizedprostatecancer
AT egawashin acomparativestudyontheefficaciesofgonadotropinreleasinghormonegnrhagonistandgnrhantagonistinneoadjuvantandrogendeprivationtherapycombinedwithtransperinealprostatebrachytherapyforlocalizedprostatecancer
AT mikikenta comparativestudyontheefficaciesofgonadotropinreleasinghormonegnrhagonistandgnrhantagonistinneoadjuvantandrogendeprivationtherapycombinedwithtransperinealprostatebrachytherapyforlocalizedprostatecancer
AT sasakihiroshi comparativestudyontheefficaciesofgonadotropinreleasinghormonegnrhagonistandgnrhantagonistinneoadjuvantandrogendeprivationtherapycombinedwithtransperinealprostatebrachytherapyforlocalizedprostatecancer
AT kidomasahito comparativestudyontheefficaciesofgonadotropinreleasinghormonegnrhagonistandgnrhantagonistinneoadjuvantandrogendeprivationtherapycombinedwithtransperinealprostatebrachytherapyforlocalizedprostatecancer
AT takahashihiroyuki comparativestudyontheefficaciesofgonadotropinreleasinghormonegnrhagonistandgnrhantagonistinneoadjuvantandrogendeprivationtherapycombinedwithtransperinealprostatebrachytherapyforlocalizedprostatecancer
AT aokimanabu comparativestudyontheefficaciesofgonadotropinreleasinghormonegnrhagonistandgnrhantagonistinneoadjuvantandrogendeprivationtherapycombinedwithtransperinealprostatebrachytherapyforlocalizedprostatecancer
AT egawashin comparativestudyontheefficaciesofgonadotropinreleasinghormonegnrhagonistandgnrhantagonistinneoadjuvantandrogendeprivationtherapycombinedwithtransperinealprostatebrachytherapyforlocalizedprostatecancer