Cargando…

The reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Oxford Elbow Score

BACKGROUND: Objective measures of outcome ensure reliable decisions with regard to treatment planning. Oxford Elbow Score (OES) is one of the common outcome measures used for assessing quality of life of patients with elbow disorders. OES consists of three domains: pain, elbow function and social/ps...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yosmaoglu, Hayri Baran, Doğan, Deha, Sonmezer, Emel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5009656/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27586810
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-016-0429-3
_version_ 1782451553875001344
author Yosmaoglu, Hayri Baran
Doğan, Deha
Sonmezer, Emel
author_facet Yosmaoglu, Hayri Baran
Doğan, Deha
Sonmezer, Emel
author_sort Yosmaoglu, Hayri Baran
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Objective measures of outcome ensure reliable decisions with regard to treatment planning. Oxford Elbow Score (OES) is one of the common outcome measures used for assessing quality of life of patients with elbow disorders. OES consists of three domains: pain, elbow function and social/psychological. The aim of this study is to test the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the OES. METHODS: The study’s sample includes 82 patients with elbow problems. The original version of the OES was translated into Turkish using the Isis Outcomes Translation and Linguistic Validation Process. The construct validity of the Turkish version of the OES was tested using a confirmatory factor analysis. For internal consistency, Cronbach’s alpha was calculated. A Pearson correlation and a dependent sample t test were utilised for reproducibility of the OES. For convergent validity, the correlation coefficients were calculated between the domains of the OES and Short Form 36 (SF36). An independent sample t test was calculated to determine if there was a significant difference between the scores of the participants from the upper and lower groups. RESULTS: Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) indicates that the three-factor structure of the OES was confirmed. Most of the fit indices are at the expected level, except for a root mean square error of approximation and an adjusted goodness of fit index. Cronbach’s alpha was calculated as 0.91 for the whole scale. The results showed that there are positive and high correlations between the first and follow-up assessments (r = 0.89, p < 0.0001). The Turkish OES version and its dimensions have moderate and significant correlations with domains of SF36 in general. The test results indicated that the mean of each item on three domains of the OES was higher for the upper 27 %, and this difference was significant at the 0.01 level. CONCLUSIONS: The Turkish version of the OES is a reliable, valid, reproducible and practical tool. It can be used for patients with elbow disorders and is recommended for clinician use.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5009656
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50096562016-09-03 The reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Oxford Elbow Score Yosmaoglu, Hayri Baran Doğan, Deha Sonmezer, Emel J Orthop Surg Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Objective measures of outcome ensure reliable decisions with regard to treatment planning. Oxford Elbow Score (OES) is one of the common outcome measures used for assessing quality of life of patients with elbow disorders. OES consists of three domains: pain, elbow function and social/psychological. The aim of this study is to test the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the OES. METHODS: The study’s sample includes 82 patients with elbow problems. The original version of the OES was translated into Turkish using the Isis Outcomes Translation and Linguistic Validation Process. The construct validity of the Turkish version of the OES was tested using a confirmatory factor analysis. For internal consistency, Cronbach’s alpha was calculated. A Pearson correlation and a dependent sample t test were utilised for reproducibility of the OES. For convergent validity, the correlation coefficients were calculated between the domains of the OES and Short Form 36 (SF36). An independent sample t test was calculated to determine if there was a significant difference between the scores of the participants from the upper and lower groups. RESULTS: Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) indicates that the three-factor structure of the OES was confirmed. Most of the fit indices are at the expected level, except for a root mean square error of approximation and an adjusted goodness of fit index. Cronbach’s alpha was calculated as 0.91 for the whole scale. The results showed that there are positive and high correlations between the first and follow-up assessments (r = 0.89, p < 0.0001). The Turkish OES version and its dimensions have moderate and significant correlations with domains of SF36 in general. The test results indicated that the mean of each item on three domains of the OES was higher for the upper 27 %, and this difference was significant at the 0.01 level. CONCLUSIONS: The Turkish version of the OES is a reliable, valid, reproducible and practical tool. It can be used for patients with elbow disorders and is recommended for clinician use. BioMed Central 2016-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5009656/ /pubmed/27586810 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-016-0429-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Yosmaoglu, Hayri Baran
Doğan, Deha
Sonmezer, Emel
The reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Oxford Elbow Score
title The reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Oxford Elbow Score
title_full The reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Oxford Elbow Score
title_fullStr The reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Oxford Elbow Score
title_full_unstemmed The reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Oxford Elbow Score
title_short The reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Oxford Elbow Score
title_sort reliability and validity of the turkish version of the oxford elbow score
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5009656/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27586810
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-016-0429-3
work_keys_str_mv AT yosmaogluhayribaran thereliabilityandvalidityoftheturkishversionoftheoxfordelbowscore
AT dogandeha thereliabilityandvalidityoftheturkishversionoftheoxfordelbowscore
AT sonmezeremel thereliabilityandvalidityoftheturkishversionoftheoxfordelbowscore
AT yosmaogluhayribaran reliabilityandvalidityoftheturkishversionoftheoxfordelbowscore
AT dogandeha reliabilityandvalidityoftheturkishversionoftheoxfordelbowscore
AT sonmezeremel reliabilityandvalidityoftheturkishversionoftheoxfordelbowscore