Cargando…

Goal-directed mechanisms that constrain retrieval predict subsequent memory for new “foil” information

To remember a previous event, it is often helpful to use goal-directed control processes to constrain what comes to mind during retrieval. Behavioral studies have demonstrated that incidental learning of new “foil” words in a recognition test is superior if the participant is trying to remember stud...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vogelsang, David A., Bonnici, Heidi M., Bergström, Zara M., Ranganath, Charan, Simons, Jon S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Pergamon Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5010040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27431039
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.07.016
_version_ 1782451618080358400
author Vogelsang, David A.
Bonnici, Heidi M.
Bergström, Zara M.
Ranganath, Charan
Simons, Jon S.
author_facet Vogelsang, David A.
Bonnici, Heidi M.
Bergström, Zara M.
Ranganath, Charan
Simons, Jon S.
author_sort Vogelsang, David A.
collection PubMed
description To remember a previous event, it is often helpful to use goal-directed control processes to constrain what comes to mind during retrieval. Behavioral studies have demonstrated that incidental learning of new “foil” words in a recognition test is superior if the participant is trying to remember studied items that were semantically encoded compared to items that were non-semantically encoded. Here, we applied subsequent memory analysis to fMRI data to understand the neural mechanisms underlying the “foil effect”. Participants encoded information during deep semantic and shallow non-semantic tasks and were tested in a subsequent blocked memory task to examine how orienting retrieval towards different types of information influences the incidental encoding of new words presented as foils during the memory test phase. To assess memory for foils, participants performed a further surprise old/new recognition test involving foil words that were encountered during the previous memory test blocks as well as completely new words. Subsequent memory effects, distinguishing successful versus unsuccessful incidental encoding of foils, were observed in regions that included the left inferior frontal gyrus and posterior parietal cortex. The left inferior frontal gyrus exhibited disproportionately larger subsequent memory effects for semantic than non-semantic foils, and significant overlap in activity during semantic, but not non-semantic, initial encoding and foil encoding. The results suggest that orienting retrieval towards different types of foils involves re-implementing the neurocognitive processes that were involved during initial encoding.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5010040
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Pergamon Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50100402016-09-06 Goal-directed mechanisms that constrain retrieval predict subsequent memory for new “foil” information Vogelsang, David A. Bonnici, Heidi M. Bergström, Zara M. Ranganath, Charan Simons, Jon S. Neuropsychologia Article To remember a previous event, it is often helpful to use goal-directed control processes to constrain what comes to mind during retrieval. Behavioral studies have demonstrated that incidental learning of new “foil” words in a recognition test is superior if the participant is trying to remember studied items that were semantically encoded compared to items that were non-semantically encoded. Here, we applied subsequent memory analysis to fMRI data to understand the neural mechanisms underlying the “foil effect”. Participants encoded information during deep semantic and shallow non-semantic tasks and were tested in a subsequent blocked memory task to examine how orienting retrieval towards different types of information influences the incidental encoding of new words presented as foils during the memory test phase. To assess memory for foils, participants performed a further surprise old/new recognition test involving foil words that were encountered during the previous memory test blocks as well as completely new words. Subsequent memory effects, distinguishing successful versus unsuccessful incidental encoding of foils, were observed in regions that included the left inferior frontal gyrus and posterior parietal cortex. The left inferior frontal gyrus exhibited disproportionately larger subsequent memory effects for semantic than non-semantic foils, and significant overlap in activity during semantic, but not non-semantic, initial encoding and foil encoding. The results suggest that orienting retrieval towards different types of foils involves re-implementing the neurocognitive processes that were involved during initial encoding. Pergamon Press 2016-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5010040/ /pubmed/27431039 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.07.016 Text en © 2016 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Vogelsang, David A.
Bonnici, Heidi M.
Bergström, Zara M.
Ranganath, Charan
Simons, Jon S.
Goal-directed mechanisms that constrain retrieval predict subsequent memory for new “foil” information
title Goal-directed mechanisms that constrain retrieval predict subsequent memory for new “foil” information
title_full Goal-directed mechanisms that constrain retrieval predict subsequent memory for new “foil” information
title_fullStr Goal-directed mechanisms that constrain retrieval predict subsequent memory for new “foil” information
title_full_unstemmed Goal-directed mechanisms that constrain retrieval predict subsequent memory for new “foil” information
title_short Goal-directed mechanisms that constrain retrieval predict subsequent memory for new “foil” information
title_sort goal-directed mechanisms that constrain retrieval predict subsequent memory for new “foil” information
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5010040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27431039
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.07.016
work_keys_str_mv AT vogelsangdavida goaldirectedmechanismsthatconstrainretrievalpredictsubsequentmemoryfornewfoilinformation
AT bonniciheidim goaldirectedmechanismsthatconstrainretrievalpredictsubsequentmemoryfornewfoilinformation
AT bergstromzaram goaldirectedmechanismsthatconstrainretrievalpredictsubsequentmemoryfornewfoilinformation
AT ranganathcharan goaldirectedmechanismsthatconstrainretrievalpredictsubsequentmemoryfornewfoilinformation
AT simonsjons goaldirectedmechanismsthatconstrainretrievalpredictsubsequentmemoryfornewfoilinformation