Cargando…
Goal-directed mechanisms that constrain retrieval predict subsequent memory for new “foil” information
To remember a previous event, it is often helpful to use goal-directed control processes to constrain what comes to mind during retrieval. Behavioral studies have demonstrated that incidental learning of new “foil” words in a recognition test is superior if the participant is trying to remember stud...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Pergamon Press
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5010040/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27431039 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.07.016 |
_version_ | 1782451618080358400 |
---|---|
author | Vogelsang, David A. Bonnici, Heidi M. Bergström, Zara M. Ranganath, Charan Simons, Jon S. |
author_facet | Vogelsang, David A. Bonnici, Heidi M. Bergström, Zara M. Ranganath, Charan Simons, Jon S. |
author_sort | Vogelsang, David A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | To remember a previous event, it is often helpful to use goal-directed control processes to constrain what comes to mind during retrieval. Behavioral studies have demonstrated that incidental learning of new “foil” words in a recognition test is superior if the participant is trying to remember studied items that were semantically encoded compared to items that were non-semantically encoded. Here, we applied subsequent memory analysis to fMRI data to understand the neural mechanisms underlying the “foil effect”. Participants encoded information during deep semantic and shallow non-semantic tasks and were tested in a subsequent blocked memory task to examine how orienting retrieval towards different types of information influences the incidental encoding of new words presented as foils during the memory test phase. To assess memory for foils, participants performed a further surprise old/new recognition test involving foil words that were encountered during the previous memory test blocks as well as completely new words. Subsequent memory effects, distinguishing successful versus unsuccessful incidental encoding of foils, were observed in regions that included the left inferior frontal gyrus and posterior parietal cortex. The left inferior frontal gyrus exhibited disproportionately larger subsequent memory effects for semantic than non-semantic foils, and significant overlap in activity during semantic, but not non-semantic, initial encoding and foil encoding. The results suggest that orienting retrieval towards different types of foils involves re-implementing the neurocognitive processes that were involved during initial encoding. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5010040 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Pergamon Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50100402016-09-06 Goal-directed mechanisms that constrain retrieval predict subsequent memory for new “foil” information Vogelsang, David A. Bonnici, Heidi M. Bergström, Zara M. Ranganath, Charan Simons, Jon S. Neuropsychologia Article To remember a previous event, it is often helpful to use goal-directed control processes to constrain what comes to mind during retrieval. Behavioral studies have demonstrated that incidental learning of new “foil” words in a recognition test is superior if the participant is trying to remember studied items that were semantically encoded compared to items that were non-semantically encoded. Here, we applied subsequent memory analysis to fMRI data to understand the neural mechanisms underlying the “foil effect”. Participants encoded information during deep semantic and shallow non-semantic tasks and were tested in a subsequent blocked memory task to examine how orienting retrieval towards different types of information influences the incidental encoding of new words presented as foils during the memory test phase. To assess memory for foils, participants performed a further surprise old/new recognition test involving foil words that were encountered during the previous memory test blocks as well as completely new words. Subsequent memory effects, distinguishing successful versus unsuccessful incidental encoding of foils, were observed in regions that included the left inferior frontal gyrus and posterior parietal cortex. The left inferior frontal gyrus exhibited disproportionately larger subsequent memory effects for semantic than non-semantic foils, and significant overlap in activity during semantic, but not non-semantic, initial encoding and foil encoding. The results suggest that orienting retrieval towards different types of foils involves re-implementing the neurocognitive processes that were involved during initial encoding. Pergamon Press 2016-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5010040/ /pubmed/27431039 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.07.016 Text en © 2016 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Vogelsang, David A. Bonnici, Heidi M. Bergström, Zara M. Ranganath, Charan Simons, Jon S. Goal-directed mechanisms that constrain retrieval predict subsequent memory for new “foil” information |
title | Goal-directed mechanisms that constrain retrieval predict subsequent memory for new “foil” information |
title_full | Goal-directed mechanisms that constrain retrieval predict subsequent memory for new “foil” information |
title_fullStr | Goal-directed mechanisms that constrain retrieval predict subsequent memory for new “foil” information |
title_full_unstemmed | Goal-directed mechanisms that constrain retrieval predict subsequent memory for new “foil” information |
title_short | Goal-directed mechanisms that constrain retrieval predict subsequent memory for new “foil” information |
title_sort | goal-directed mechanisms that constrain retrieval predict subsequent memory for new “foil” information |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5010040/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27431039 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.07.016 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vogelsangdavida goaldirectedmechanismsthatconstrainretrievalpredictsubsequentmemoryfornewfoilinformation AT bonniciheidim goaldirectedmechanismsthatconstrainretrievalpredictsubsequentmemoryfornewfoilinformation AT bergstromzaram goaldirectedmechanismsthatconstrainretrievalpredictsubsequentmemoryfornewfoilinformation AT ranganathcharan goaldirectedmechanismsthatconstrainretrievalpredictsubsequentmemoryfornewfoilinformation AT simonsjons goaldirectedmechanismsthatconstrainretrievalpredictsubsequentmemoryfornewfoilinformation |