Cargando…

Critical appraisal of paclitaxel balloon angioplasty for femoral–popliteal arterial disease

Peripheral arterial disease, particularly critical limb ischemia, is an area with urgent need for optimized therapies because, to date, vascular interventions often have limited life spans. In spite of initial encouraging technical success after femoropopliteal percutaneous transluminal angioplasty...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Herten, Monika, Torsello, Giovanni B, Schönefeld, Eva, Stahlhoff, Stefan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5010165/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27621646
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/VHRM.S81122
_version_ 1782451637207433216
author Herten, Monika
Torsello, Giovanni B
Schönefeld, Eva
Stahlhoff, Stefan
author_facet Herten, Monika
Torsello, Giovanni B
Schönefeld, Eva
Stahlhoff, Stefan
author_sort Herten, Monika
collection PubMed
description Peripheral arterial disease, particularly critical limb ischemia, is an area with urgent need for optimized therapies because, to date, vascular interventions often have limited life spans. In spite of initial encouraging technical success after femoropopliteal percutaneous transluminal angioplasty or stenting, postprocedural restenosis remains the major problem. The challenging idea behind the drug-coated balloon (DCB) concept is the biological modification of the injury response after balloon dilatation. Antiproliferative drugs administered via DCBs or drug-eluting stents are able to suppress neointimal hyperplasia, the main cause of restenosis. This article reviews the results of DCB treatments of femoropopliteal and infrapopliteal lesions in comparison to standard angioplasty with uncoated balloons. A systematic literature search was performed in 1) medical journals (ie, MEDLINE), 2) international registers for clinical studies (ie, www.clinicaltrials.gov), and 3) abstracts of scientific sessions. Several controlled randomized trials with follow-up periods of up to 5 years demonstrated the efficacy of paclitaxel –DCB technology. However, calcified lesions seem to affect the efficacy of DCB. Combinations of preconditioning methods with DCBs showed promising results. Although the mechanical abrasion of calcium via atherectomy or laser ablation showed favorable periprocedural results, the long-term impact on restenosis and clinical outcome has to be demonstrated. Major advantages of the DCBs are the rapid delivery of drug at uniform concentrations with a single dose, their efficacy in areas wherein stents have been contraindicated until now (ie, bifurcation, ostial lesions), and in leaving no stent scaffold behind. Reinterventions are easier to perform because DCBs leave no metal behind. Various combinations of DCBs with other treatment modalities may prove to be viable options in future. The follow-up results of clinical studies will evaluate the long-term impact of DCBs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5010165
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50101652016-09-12 Critical appraisal of paclitaxel balloon angioplasty for femoral–popliteal arterial disease Herten, Monika Torsello, Giovanni B Schönefeld, Eva Stahlhoff, Stefan Vasc Health Risk Manag Review Peripheral arterial disease, particularly critical limb ischemia, is an area with urgent need for optimized therapies because, to date, vascular interventions often have limited life spans. In spite of initial encouraging technical success after femoropopliteal percutaneous transluminal angioplasty or stenting, postprocedural restenosis remains the major problem. The challenging idea behind the drug-coated balloon (DCB) concept is the biological modification of the injury response after balloon dilatation. Antiproliferative drugs administered via DCBs or drug-eluting stents are able to suppress neointimal hyperplasia, the main cause of restenosis. This article reviews the results of DCB treatments of femoropopliteal and infrapopliteal lesions in comparison to standard angioplasty with uncoated balloons. A systematic literature search was performed in 1) medical journals (ie, MEDLINE), 2) international registers for clinical studies (ie, www.clinicaltrials.gov), and 3) abstracts of scientific sessions. Several controlled randomized trials with follow-up periods of up to 5 years demonstrated the efficacy of paclitaxel –DCB technology. However, calcified lesions seem to affect the efficacy of DCB. Combinations of preconditioning methods with DCBs showed promising results. Although the mechanical abrasion of calcium via atherectomy or laser ablation showed favorable periprocedural results, the long-term impact on restenosis and clinical outcome has to be demonstrated. Major advantages of the DCBs are the rapid delivery of drug at uniform concentrations with a single dose, their efficacy in areas wherein stents have been contraindicated until now (ie, bifurcation, ostial lesions), and in leaving no stent scaffold behind. Reinterventions are easier to perform because DCBs leave no metal behind. Various combinations of DCBs with other treatment modalities may prove to be viable options in future. The follow-up results of clinical studies will evaluate the long-term impact of DCBs. Dove Medical Press 2016-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5010165/ /pubmed/27621646 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/VHRM.S81122 Text en © 2016 Herten et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Review
Herten, Monika
Torsello, Giovanni B
Schönefeld, Eva
Stahlhoff, Stefan
Critical appraisal of paclitaxel balloon angioplasty for femoral–popliteal arterial disease
title Critical appraisal of paclitaxel balloon angioplasty for femoral–popliteal arterial disease
title_full Critical appraisal of paclitaxel balloon angioplasty for femoral–popliteal arterial disease
title_fullStr Critical appraisal of paclitaxel balloon angioplasty for femoral–popliteal arterial disease
title_full_unstemmed Critical appraisal of paclitaxel balloon angioplasty for femoral–popliteal arterial disease
title_short Critical appraisal of paclitaxel balloon angioplasty for femoral–popliteal arterial disease
title_sort critical appraisal of paclitaxel balloon angioplasty for femoral–popliteal arterial disease
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5010165/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27621646
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/VHRM.S81122
work_keys_str_mv AT hertenmonika criticalappraisalofpaclitaxelballoonangioplastyforfemoralpoplitealarterialdisease
AT torsellogiovannib criticalappraisalofpaclitaxelballoonangioplastyforfemoralpoplitealarterialdisease
AT schonefeldeva criticalappraisalofpaclitaxelballoonangioplastyforfemoralpoplitealarterialdisease
AT stahlhoffstefan criticalappraisalofpaclitaxelballoonangioplastyforfemoralpoplitealarterialdisease