Cargando…
Automated Retinal Layer Segmentation Using Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography: Evaluation of Inter-Session Repeatability and Agreement between Devices
Retinal and intra-retinal layer thicknesses are routinely generated from optical coherence tomography (OCT) images, but on-board software capabilities and image scaling assumptions are not consistent across devices. This study evaluates the device-independent Iowa Reference Algorithms (Iowa Institut...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5010216/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27588683 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162001 |
_version_ | 1782451650241232896 |
---|---|
author | Terry, Louise Cassels, Nicola Lu, Kelly Acton, Jennifer H. Margrain, Tom H. North, Rachel V. Fergusson, James White, Nick Wood, Ashley |
author_facet | Terry, Louise Cassels, Nicola Lu, Kelly Acton, Jennifer H. Margrain, Tom H. North, Rachel V. Fergusson, James White, Nick Wood, Ashley |
author_sort | Terry, Louise |
collection | PubMed |
description | Retinal and intra-retinal layer thicknesses are routinely generated from optical coherence tomography (OCT) images, but on-board software capabilities and image scaling assumptions are not consistent across devices. This study evaluates the device-independent Iowa Reference Algorithms (Iowa Institute for Biomedical Imaging) for automated intra-retinal layer segmentation and image scaling for three OCT systems. Healthy participants (n = 25) underwent macular volume scans using a Cirrus HD-OCT (Zeiss), 3D-OCT 1000 (Topcon), and a non-commercial long-wavelength (1040nm) OCT on two occasions. Mean thickness of 10 intra-retinal layers was measured in three ETDRS subfields (fovea, inner ring and outer ring) using the Iowa Reference Algorithms. Where available, total retinal thicknesses were measured using on-board software. Measured axial eye length (AEL)-dependent scaling was used throughout, with a comparison made to the system-specific fixed-AEL scaling. Inter-session repeatability and agreement between OCT systems and segmentation methods was assessed. Inter-session coefficient of repeatability (CoR) for the foveal subfield total retinal thickness was 3.43μm, 4.76μm, and 5.98μm for the Zeiss, Topcon, and long-wavelength images respectively. For the commercial software, CoR was 4.63μm (Zeiss) and 7.63μm (Topcon). The Iowa Reference Algorithms demonstrated higher repeatability than the on-board software and, in addition, reliably segmented all 10 intra-retinal layers. With fixed-AEL scaling, the algorithm produced significantly different thickness values for the three OCT devices (P<0.05), with these discrepancies generally characterized by an overall offset (bias) and correlations with axial eye length for the foveal subfield and outer ring (P<0.05). This correlation was reduced to an insignificant level in all cases when AEL-dependent scaling was used. Overall, the Iowa Reference Algorithms are viable for clinical and research use in healthy eyes imaged with these devices, however ocular biometry is required for accurate quantification of OCT images. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5010216 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50102162016-09-27 Automated Retinal Layer Segmentation Using Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography: Evaluation of Inter-Session Repeatability and Agreement between Devices Terry, Louise Cassels, Nicola Lu, Kelly Acton, Jennifer H. Margrain, Tom H. North, Rachel V. Fergusson, James White, Nick Wood, Ashley PLoS One Research Article Retinal and intra-retinal layer thicknesses are routinely generated from optical coherence tomography (OCT) images, but on-board software capabilities and image scaling assumptions are not consistent across devices. This study evaluates the device-independent Iowa Reference Algorithms (Iowa Institute for Biomedical Imaging) for automated intra-retinal layer segmentation and image scaling for three OCT systems. Healthy participants (n = 25) underwent macular volume scans using a Cirrus HD-OCT (Zeiss), 3D-OCT 1000 (Topcon), and a non-commercial long-wavelength (1040nm) OCT on two occasions. Mean thickness of 10 intra-retinal layers was measured in three ETDRS subfields (fovea, inner ring and outer ring) using the Iowa Reference Algorithms. Where available, total retinal thicknesses were measured using on-board software. Measured axial eye length (AEL)-dependent scaling was used throughout, with a comparison made to the system-specific fixed-AEL scaling. Inter-session repeatability and agreement between OCT systems and segmentation methods was assessed. Inter-session coefficient of repeatability (CoR) for the foveal subfield total retinal thickness was 3.43μm, 4.76μm, and 5.98μm for the Zeiss, Topcon, and long-wavelength images respectively. For the commercial software, CoR was 4.63μm (Zeiss) and 7.63μm (Topcon). The Iowa Reference Algorithms demonstrated higher repeatability than the on-board software and, in addition, reliably segmented all 10 intra-retinal layers. With fixed-AEL scaling, the algorithm produced significantly different thickness values for the three OCT devices (P<0.05), with these discrepancies generally characterized by an overall offset (bias) and correlations with axial eye length for the foveal subfield and outer ring (P<0.05). This correlation was reduced to an insignificant level in all cases when AEL-dependent scaling was used. Overall, the Iowa Reference Algorithms are viable for clinical and research use in healthy eyes imaged with these devices, however ocular biometry is required for accurate quantification of OCT images. Public Library of Science 2016-09-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5010216/ /pubmed/27588683 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162001 Text en © 2016 Terry et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Terry, Louise Cassels, Nicola Lu, Kelly Acton, Jennifer H. Margrain, Tom H. North, Rachel V. Fergusson, James White, Nick Wood, Ashley Automated Retinal Layer Segmentation Using Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography: Evaluation of Inter-Session Repeatability and Agreement between Devices |
title | Automated Retinal Layer Segmentation Using Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography: Evaluation of Inter-Session Repeatability and Agreement between Devices |
title_full | Automated Retinal Layer Segmentation Using Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography: Evaluation of Inter-Session Repeatability and Agreement between Devices |
title_fullStr | Automated Retinal Layer Segmentation Using Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography: Evaluation of Inter-Session Repeatability and Agreement between Devices |
title_full_unstemmed | Automated Retinal Layer Segmentation Using Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography: Evaluation of Inter-Session Repeatability and Agreement between Devices |
title_short | Automated Retinal Layer Segmentation Using Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography: Evaluation of Inter-Session Repeatability and Agreement between Devices |
title_sort | automated retinal layer segmentation using spectral domain optical coherence tomography: evaluation of inter-session repeatability and agreement between devices |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5010216/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27588683 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162001 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT terrylouise automatedretinallayersegmentationusingspectraldomainopticalcoherencetomographyevaluationofintersessionrepeatabilityandagreementbetweendevices AT casselsnicola automatedretinallayersegmentationusingspectraldomainopticalcoherencetomographyevaluationofintersessionrepeatabilityandagreementbetweendevices AT lukelly automatedretinallayersegmentationusingspectraldomainopticalcoherencetomographyevaluationofintersessionrepeatabilityandagreementbetweendevices AT actonjenniferh automatedretinallayersegmentationusingspectraldomainopticalcoherencetomographyevaluationofintersessionrepeatabilityandagreementbetweendevices AT margraintomh automatedretinallayersegmentationusingspectraldomainopticalcoherencetomographyevaluationofintersessionrepeatabilityandagreementbetweendevices AT northrachelv automatedretinallayersegmentationusingspectraldomainopticalcoherencetomographyevaluationofintersessionrepeatabilityandagreementbetweendevices AT fergussonjames automatedretinallayersegmentationusingspectraldomainopticalcoherencetomographyevaluationofintersessionrepeatabilityandagreementbetweendevices AT whitenick automatedretinallayersegmentationusingspectraldomainopticalcoherencetomographyevaluationofintersessionrepeatabilityandagreementbetweendevices AT woodashley automatedretinallayersegmentationusingspectraldomainopticalcoherencetomographyevaluationofintersessionrepeatabilityandagreementbetweendevices |