Cargando…

Predictors of Reoperations in Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction

BACKGROUND: The deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) procedure is regarded a safe option for autologous breast reconstruction. Reoperations, however, may occur, and there is no consensus in the literature regarding the risk factors. The aim of this study was to identify factors associated with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Unukovych, Dmytro, Gallego, Camilo Hernandez, Aineskog, Helena, Rodriguez-Lorenzo, Andres, Mani, Maria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5010354/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27622090
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001016
_version_ 1782451677296590848
author Unukovych, Dmytro
Gallego, Camilo Hernandez
Aineskog, Helena
Rodriguez-Lorenzo, Andres
Mani, Maria
author_facet Unukovych, Dmytro
Gallego, Camilo Hernandez
Aineskog, Helena
Rodriguez-Lorenzo, Andres
Mani, Maria
author_sort Unukovych, Dmytro
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) procedure is regarded a safe option for autologous breast reconstruction. Reoperations, however, may occur, and there is no consensus in the literature regarding the risk factors. The aim of this study was to identify factors associated with reoperations in DIEP procedure. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective study of consecutive patients undergoing DIEP breast reconstruction 2007 to 2014 was performed and included a review of 433 medical charts. Surgical outcome was defined as any unanticipated reoperation requiring return to the operating room. Multivariate regression analysis was utilized to identify predictors of reoperation. The following factors were considered: age, body mass index, comorbidity, childbearing history, previous abdominal surgery, adjuvant therapy, reconstruction laterality and timing, flap and perforator characteristics, and number and size of veins. RESULTS: In total, 503 free flaps were performed in 433 patients, 363 (83.8%) unilateral and 70 (16.2%) bilateral procedures. Mean age was 51 years; 15.0% were obese; 13.4% had hypertension; 2.3% had diabetes; 42.6% received tamoxifen; 58.8% had preoperative radiotherapy; 45.6% had abdominal scars. Reoperation rate was 15.9% (80/503) and included flap failure, 2.0%; partial flap loss, 1.2%; arterial thrombosis, 2.0%; venous thrombosis, 0.8%; venous congestion, 1.2%; vein kinking, 0.6%. Other complications included bleeding, 2.2%; hematoma, 3.0%; fat necrosis, 2.8%, and infection, 0.2%. Factors negatively associated with reoperation were childbearing history (odds ratio [OR]: 3.18, P = 0.001) and dual venous drainage (OR: 1.91, P = 0.016); however, only childbearing remained significant in the multivariate analyses (OR: 4.56, P = 0.023). CONCLUSIONS: The history of childbearing was found to be protective against reoperation. Number of venous anastomoses may also affect reoperation incidence, and dual venous drainage could be beneficial in nulliparous patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5010354
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50103542016-09-12 Predictors of Reoperations in Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction Unukovych, Dmytro Gallego, Camilo Hernandez Aineskog, Helena Rodriguez-Lorenzo, Andres Mani, Maria Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Original Article BACKGROUND: The deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) procedure is regarded a safe option for autologous breast reconstruction. Reoperations, however, may occur, and there is no consensus in the literature regarding the risk factors. The aim of this study was to identify factors associated with reoperations in DIEP procedure. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective study of consecutive patients undergoing DIEP breast reconstruction 2007 to 2014 was performed and included a review of 433 medical charts. Surgical outcome was defined as any unanticipated reoperation requiring return to the operating room. Multivariate regression analysis was utilized to identify predictors of reoperation. The following factors were considered: age, body mass index, comorbidity, childbearing history, previous abdominal surgery, adjuvant therapy, reconstruction laterality and timing, flap and perforator characteristics, and number and size of veins. RESULTS: In total, 503 free flaps were performed in 433 patients, 363 (83.8%) unilateral and 70 (16.2%) bilateral procedures. Mean age was 51 years; 15.0% were obese; 13.4% had hypertension; 2.3% had diabetes; 42.6% received tamoxifen; 58.8% had preoperative radiotherapy; 45.6% had abdominal scars. Reoperation rate was 15.9% (80/503) and included flap failure, 2.0%; partial flap loss, 1.2%; arterial thrombosis, 2.0%; venous thrombosis, 0.8%; venous congestion, 1.2%; vein kinking, 0.6%. Other complications included bleeding, 2.2%; hematoma, 3.0%; fat necrosis, 2.8%, and infection, 0.2%. Factors negatively associated with reoperation were childbearing history (odds ratio [OR]: 3.18, P = 0.001) and dual venous drainage (OR: 1.91, P = 0.016); however, only childbearing remained significant in the multivariate analyses (OR: 4.56, P = 0.023). CONCLUSIONS: The history of childbearing was found to be protective against reoperation. Number of venous anastomoses may also affect reoperation incidence, and dual venous drainage could be beneficial in nulliparous patients. Wolters Kluwer Health 2016-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5010354/ /pubmed/27622090 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001016 Text en Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. All rights reserved. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially.
spellingShingle Original Article
Unukovych, Dmytro
Gallego, Camilo Hernandez
Aineskog, Helena
Rodriguez-Lorenzo, Andres
Mani, Maria
Predictors of Reoperations in Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction
title Predictors of Reoperations in Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction
title_full Predictors of Reoperations in Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction
title_fullStr Predictors of Reoperations in Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction
title_full_unstemmed Predictors of Reoperations in Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction
title_short Predictors of Reoperations in Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction
title_sort predictors of reoperations in deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5010354/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27622090
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001016
work_keys_str_mv AT unukovychdmytro predictorsofreoperationsindeepinferiorepigastricperforatorflapbreastreconstruction
AT gallegocamilohernandez predictorsofreoperationsindeepinferiorepigastricperforatorflapbreastreconstruction
AT aineskoghelena predictorsofreoperationsindeepinferiorepigastricperforatorflapbreastreconstruction
AT rodriguezlorenzoandres predictorsofreoperationsindeepinferiorepigastricperforatorflapbreastreconstruction
AT manimaria predictorsofreoperationsindeepinferiorepigastricperforatorflapbreastreconstruction