Cargando…

Atrial rhythm influences catheter tissue contact during radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: comparison of contact force between sinus rhythm and atrial fibrillation

Catheter tissue contact force (CF) is an important factor for durable lesion formation during radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) of atrial fibrillation (AF). Since CF varies in the beating heart, atrial rhythm during RFCA may influence CF. A high-density map and RFCA points were obtained in 25...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matsuda, Hisao, Parwani, Abdul Shokor, Attanasio, Philipp, Huemer, Martin, Wutzler, Alexander, Blaschke, Florian, Haverkamp, Wilhelm, Boldt, Leif-Hendrik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Japan 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5010593/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26498938
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00380-015-0763-0
_version_ 1782451701984264192
author Matsuda, Hisao
Parwani, Abdul Shokor
Attanasio, Philipp
Huemer, Martin
Wutzler, Alexander
Blaschke, Florian
Haverkamp, Wilhelm
Boldt, Leif-Hendrik
author_facet Matsuda, Hisao
Parwani, Abdul Shokor
Attanasio, Philipp
Huemer, Martin
Wutzler, Alexander
Blaschke, Florian
Haverkamp, Wilhelm
Boldt, Leif-Hendrik
author_sort Matsuda, Hisao
collection PubMed
description Catheter tissue contact force (CF) is an important factor for durable lesion formation during radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) of atrial fibrillation (AF). Since CF varies in the beating heart, atrial rhythm during RFCA may influence CF. A high-density map and RFCA points were obtained in 25 patients undergoing RFCA of AF using a CF-sensing catheter (Tacticath, St. Jude Medical). The operators were blinded to the CF information. Contact type was classified into three categories: constant, variable, and intermittent contact. Average CF and contact type were analyzed according to atrial rhythm (SR vs. AF) and anatomical location. A total of 1364 points (891 points during SR and 473 points during AF) were analyzed. Average CFs showed no significant difference between SR (17.2 ± 11.3 g) and AF (17.2 ± 13.3 g; p = 0.99). The distribution of points with an average CF of ≥20 and <10 g also showed no significant difference. However, the distribution of excessive CF (CF ≥40 g) was significantly higher during AF (7.4 %) in comparison with SR (4.2 %; p < 0.05). At the anterior area of the right inferior pulmonary vein (RIPV), the average CF during AF was significantly higher than during SR (p < 0.05). Constant contact was significantly higher during AF (32.2 %) when compared to SR (9.9 %; p < 0.01). Although the average CF was not different between atrial rhythms, constant contact was more often achievable during AF than it was during SR. However, excessive CF also seems to occur more frequently during AF especially at the anterior part of RIPV.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5010593
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer Japan
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50105932016-09-16 Atrial rhythm influences catheter tissue contact during radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: comparison of contact force between sinus rhythm and atrial fibrillation Matsuda, Hisao Parwani, Abdul Shokor Attanasio, Philipp Huemer, Martin Wutzler, Alexander Blaschke, Florian Haverkamp, Wilhelm Boldt, Leif-Hendrik Heart Vessels Original Article Catheter tissue contact force (CF) is an important factor for durable lesion formation during radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) of atrial fibrillation (AF). Since CF varies in the beating heart, atrial rhythm during RFCA may influence CF. A high-density map and RFCA points were obtained in 25 patients undergoing RFCA of AF using a CF-sensing catheter (Tacticath, St. Jude Medical). The operators were blinded to the CF information. Contact type was classified into three categories: constant, variable, and intermittent contact. Average CF and contact type were analyzed according to atrial rhythm (SR vs. AF) and anatomical location. A total of 1364 points (891 points during SR and 473 points during AF) were analyzed. Average CFs showed no significant difference between SR (17.2 ± 11.3 g) and AF (17.2 ± 13.3 g; p = 0.99). The distribution of points with an average CF of ≥20 and <10 g also showed no significant difference. However, the distribution of excessive CF (CF ≥40 g) was significantly higher during AF (7.4 %) in comparison with SR (4.2 %; p < 0.05). At the anterior area of the right inferior pulmonary vein (RIPV), the average CF during AF was significantly higher than during SR (p < 0.05). Constant contact was significantly higher during AF (32.2 %) when compared to SR (9.9 %; p < 0.01). Although the average CF was not different between atrial rhythms, constant contact was more often achievable during AF than it was during SR. However, excessive CF also seems to occur more frequently during AF especially at the anterior part of RIPV. Springer Japan 2015-10-26 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5010593/ /pubmed/26498938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00380-015-0763-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Matsuda, Hisao
Parwani, Abdul Shokor
Attanasio, Philipp
Huemer, Martin
Wutzler, Alexander
Blaschke, Florian
Haverkamp, Wilhelm
Boldt, Leif-Hendrik
Atrial rhythm influences catheter tissue contact during radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: comparison of contact force between sinus rhythm and atrial fibrillation
title Atrial rhythm influences catheter tissue contact during radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: comparison of contact force between sinus rhythm and atrial fibrillation
title_full Atrial rhythm influences catheter tissue contact during radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: comparison of contact force between sinus rhythm and atrial fibrillation
title_fullStr Atrial rhythm influences catheter tissue contact during radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: comparison of contact force between sinus rhythm and atrial fibrillation
title_full_unstemmed Atrial rhythm influences catheter tissue contact during radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: comparison of contact force between sinus rhythm and atrial fibrillation
title_short Atrial rhythm influences catheter tissue contact during radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: comparison of contact force between sinus rhythm and atrial fibrillation
title_sort atrial rhythm influences catheter tissue contact during radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: comparison of contact force between sinus rhythm and atrial fibrillation
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5010593/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26498938
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00380-015-0763-0
work_keys_str_mv AT matsudahisao atrialrhythminfluencescathetertissuecontactduringradiofrequencycatheterablationofatrialfibrillationcomparisonofcontactforcebetweensinusrhythmandatrialfibrillation
AT parwaniabdulshokor atrialrhythminfluencescathetertissuecontactduringradiofrequencycatheterablationofatrialfibrillationcomparisonofcontactforcebetweensinusrhythmandatrialfibrillation
AT attanasiophilipp atrialrhythminfluencescathetertissuecontactduringradiofrequencycatheterablationofatrialfibrillationcomparisonofcontactforcebetweensinusrhythmandatrialfibrillation
AT huemermartin atrialrhythminfluencescathetertissuecontactduringradiofrequencycatheterablationofatrialfibrillationcomparisonofcontactforcebetweensinusrhythmandatrialfibrillation
AT wutzleralexander atrialrhythminfluencescathetertissuecontactduringradiofrequencycatheterablationofatrialfibrillationcomparisonofcontactforcebetweensinusrhythmandatrialfibrillation
AT blaschkeflorian atrialrhythminfluencescathetertissuecontactduringradiofrequencycatheterablationofatrialfibrillationcomparisonofcontactforcebetweensinusrhythmandatrialfibrillation
AT haverkampwilhelm atrialrhythminfluencescathetertissuecontactduringradiofrequencycatheterablationofatrialfibrillationcomparisonofcontactforcebetweensinusrhythmandatrialfibrillation
AT boldtleifhendrik atrialrhythminfluencescathetertissuecontactduringradiofrequencycatheterablationofatrialfibrillationcomparisonofcontactforcebetweensinusrhythmandatrialfibrillation