Cargando…
The choice of locking plate in the treatment of peri-implant femoral fracture eight years after trans-trochanteric rotational osteotomy: A case report()
INTRODUCTION: Transtrochanteric anterior rotational osteotomy of the femoral head (TRO) was developed as a joint preserving surgery for osteonecrosis of the femoral head. To the best of our knowledge, peri-implant fractures after femoral osteotomy have rarely been reported. PRESENTATION OF CASE: We...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5010635/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27475117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2016.07.020 |
_version_ | 1782451709413425152 |
---|---|
author | Utsunomiya, Takeshi Yamamoto, Takuaki Motomura, Goro Karasuyama, Kazuyuki Sonoda, Kazuhiko Kubo, Yusuke Hatanaka, Hiroyuki Iwamoto, Yukihide |
author_facet | Utsunomiya, Takeshi Yamamoto, Takuaki Motomura, Goro Karasuyama, Kazuyuki Sonoda, Kazuhiko Kubo, Yusuke Hatanaka, Hiroyuki Iwamoto, Yukihide |
author_sort | Utsunomiya, Takeshi |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Transtrochanteric anterior rotational osteotomy of the femoral head (TRO) was developed as a joint preserving surgery for osteonecrosis of the femoral head. To the best of our knowledge, peri-implant fractures after femoral osteotomy have rarely been reported. PRESENTATION OF CASE: We report a 58-year-old female who suffered a peri-implant femoral shaft fracture following a fall from a stepladder eight years after TRO. Fracture union was achieved six months after a preferred proximal femoral locking plate. DISCUSSION: The entry point of the ante-grade femoral nail would have been very close to the new position of the nutrient artery of the femoral head occasioned by the TRO and to avoid injury, we chose proximal femoral locking plate. CONCLUSION: It is important to consider the new position of the nutrient artery of the femoral head in the surgical planning of peri-implant fracture after TRO. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5010635 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50106352016-09-14 The choice of locking plate in the treatment of peri-implant femoral fracture eight years after trans-trochanteric rotational osteotomy: A case report() Utsunomiya, Takeshi Yamamoto, Takuaki Motomura, Goro Karasuyama, Kazuyuki Sonoda, Kazuhiko Kubo, Yusuke Hatanaka, Hiroyuki Iwamoto, Yukihide Int J Surg Case Rep Case Report INTRODUCTION: Transtrochanteric anterior rotational osteotomy of the femoral head (TRO) was developed as a joint preserving surgery for osteonecrosis of the femoral head. To the best of our knowledge, peri-implant fractures after femoral osteotomy have rarely been reported. PRESENTATION OF CASE: We report a 58-year-old female who suffered a peri-implant femoral shaft fracture following a fall from a stepladder eight years after TRO. Fracture union was achieved six months after a preferred proximal femoral locking plate. DISCUSSION: The entry point of the ante-grade femoral nail would have been very close to the new position of the nutrient artery of the femoral head occasioned by the TRO and to avoid injury, we chose proximal femoral locking plate. CONCLUSION: It is important to consider the new position of the nutrient artery of the femoral head in the surgical planning of peri-implant fracture after TRO. Elsevier 2016-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5010635/ /pubmed/27475117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2016.07.020 Text en © 2016 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Case Report Utsunomiya, Takeshi Yamamoto, Takuaki Motomura, Goro Karasuyama, Kazuyuki Sonoda, Kazuhiko Kubo, Yusuke Hatanaka, Hiroyuki Iwamoto, Yukihide The choice of locking plate in the treatment of peri-implant femoral fracture eight years after trans-trochanteric rotational osteotomy: A case report() |
title | The choice of locking plate in the treatment of peri-implant femoral fracture eight years after trans-trochanteric rotational osteotomy: A case report() |
title_full | The choice of locking plate in the treatment of peri-implant femoral fracture eight years after trans-trochanteric rotational osteotomy: A case report() |
title_fullStr | The choice of locking plate in the treatment of peri-implant femoral fracture eight years after trans-trochanteric rotational osteotomy: A case report() |
title_full_unstemmed | The choice of locking plate in the treatment of peri-implant femoral fracture eight years after trans-trochanteric rotational osteotomy: A case report() |
title_short | The choice of locking plate in the treatment of peri-implant femoral fracture eight years after trans-trochanteric rotational osteotomy: A case report() |
title_sort | choice of locking plate in the treatment of peri-implant femoral fracture eight years after trans-trochanteric rotational osteotomy: a case report() |
topic | Case Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5010635/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27475117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2016.07.020 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT utsunomiyatakeshi thechoiceoflockingplateinthetreatmentofperiimplantfemoralfractureeightyearsaftertranstrochantericrotationalosteotomyacasereport AT yamamototakuaki thechoiceoflockingplateinthetreatmentofperiimplantfemoralfractureeightyearsaftertranstrochantericrotationalosteotomyacasereport AT motomuragoro thechoiceoflockingplateinthetreatmentofperiimplantfemoralfractureeightyearsaftertranstrochantericrotationalosteotomyacasereport AT karasuyamakazuyuki thechoiceoflockingplateinthetreatmentofperiimplantfemoralfractureeightyearsaftertranstrochantericrotationalosteotomyacasereport AT sonodakazuhiko thechoiceoflockingplateinthetreatmentofperiimplantfemoralfractureeightyearsaftertranstrochantericrotationalosteotomyacasereport AT kuboyusuke thechoiceoflockingplateinthetreatmentofperiimplantfemoralfractureeightyearsaftertranstrochantericrotationalosteotomyacasereport AT hatanakahiroyuki thechoiceoflockingplateinthetreatmentofperiimplantfemoralfractureeightyearsaftertranstrochantericrotationalosteotomyacasereport AT iwamotoyukihide thechoiceoflockingplateinthetreatmentofperiimplantfemoralfractureeightyearsaftertranstrochantericrotationalosteotomyacasereport AT utsunomiyatakeshi choiceoflockingplateinthetreatmentofperiimplantfemoralfractureeightyearsaftertranstrochantericrotationalosteotomyacasereport AT yamamototakuaki choiceoflockingplateinthetreatmentofperiimplantfemoralfractureeightyearsaftertranstrochantericrotationalosteotomyacasereport AT motomuragoro choiceoflockingplateinthetreatmentofperiimplantfemoralfractureeightyearsaftertranstrochantericrotationalosteotomyacasereport AT karasuyamakazuyuki choiceoflockingplateinthetreatmentofperiimplantfemoralfractureeightyearsaftertranstrochantericrotationalosteotomyacasereport AT sonodakazuhiko choiceoflockingplateinthetreatmentofperiimplantfemoralfractureeightyearsaftertranstrochantericrotationalosteotomyacasereport AT kuboyusuke choiceoflockingplateinthetreatmentofperiimplantfemoralfractureeightyearsaftertranstrochantericrotationalosteotomyacasereport AT hatanakahiroyuki choiceoflockingplateinthetreatmentofperiimplantfemoralfractureeightyearsaftertranstrochantericrotationalosteotomyacasereport AT iwamotoyukihide choiceoflockingplateinthetreatmentofperiimplantfemoralfractureeightyearsaftertranstrochantericrotationalosteotomyacasereport |