Cargando…

Effectiveness of a smartphone app in increasing physical activity amongst male adults: a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Smartphones are ideal for promoting physical activity in those with little intrinsic motivation for exercise. This study tested three hypotheses: H1 – receipt of social feedback generates higher step-counts than receipt of no feedback; H2 – receipt of social feedback generates higher ste...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harries, Tim, Eslambolchilar, Parisa, Rettie, Ruth, Stride, Chris, Walton, Simon, van Woerden, Hugo C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5010703/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27590255
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3593-9
_version_ 1782451720843952128
author Harries, Tim
Eslambolchilar, Parisa
Rettie, Ruth
Stride, Chris
Walton, Simon
van Woerden, Hugo C.
author_facet Harries, Tim
Eslambolchilar, Parisa
Rettie, Ruth
Stride, Chris
Walton, Simon
van Woerden, Hugo C.
author_sort Harries, Tim
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Smartphones are ideal for promoting physical activity in those with little intrinsic motivation for exercise. This study tested three hypotheses: H1 – receipt of social feedback generates higher step-counts than receipt of no feedback; H2 – receipt of social feedback generates higher step-counts than only receiving feedback on one’s own walking; H3 – receipt of feedback on one’s own walking generates higher step-counts than no feedback (H3). METHODS: A parallel group randomised controlled trial measured the impact of feedback on steps-counts. Healthy male participants (n = 165) aged 18–40 were given phones pre-installed with an app that recorded steps continuously, without the need for user activation. Participants carried these with them as their main phones for a two-week run-in and six-week trial. Randomisation was to three groups: no feedback (control); personal feedback on step-counts; group feedback comparing step-counts against those taken by others in their group. The primary outcome measure, steps per day, was assessed using longitudinal multilevel regression analysis. Control variables included attitude to physical activity and perceived barriers to physical activity. RESULTS: Fifty-five participants were allocated to each group; 152 completed the study and were included in the analysis: n = 49, no feedback; n = 53, individual feedback; n = 50, individual and social feedback. The study provided support for H1 and H3 but not H2. Receipt of either form of feedback explained 7.7 % of between-subject variability in step-count (F = 6.626, p < 0.0005). Compared to the control, the expected step-count for the individual feedback group was 60 % higher (effect on log step-count = 0.474, 95 % CI = 0.166–0.782) and that for the social feedback group, 69 % higher (effect on log step-count = 0.526, 95 % CI = 0.212–0.840). The difference between the two feedback groups (individual vs social feedback) was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Always-on smartphone apps that provide step-counts can increase physical activity in young to early-middle-aged men but the provision of social feedback has no apparent incremental impact. This approach may be particularly suitable for inactive people with low levels of physical activity; it should now be tested with this population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5010703
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50107032016-09-04 Effectiveness of a smartphone app in increasing physical activity amongst male adults: a randomised controlled trial Harries, Tim Eslambolchilar, Parisa Rettie, Ruth Stride, Chris Walton, Simon van Woerden, Hugo C. BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Smartphones are ideal for promoting physical activity in those with little intrinsic motivation for exercise. This study tested three hypotheses: H1 – receipt of social feedback generates higher step-counts than receipt of no feedback; H2 – receipt of social feedback generates higher step-counts than only receiving feedback on one’s own walking; H3 – receipt of feedback on one’s own walking generates higher step-counts than no feedback (H3). METHODS: A parallel group randomised controlled trial measured the impact of feedback on steps-counts. Healthy male participants (n = 165) aged 18–40 were given phones pre-installed with an app that recorded steps continuously, without the need for user activation. Participants carried these with them as their main phones for a two-week run-in and six-week trial. Randomisation was to three groups: no feedback (control); personal feedback on step-counts; group feedback comparing step-counts against those taken by others in their group. The primary outcome measure, steps per day, was assessed using longitudinal multilevel regression analysis. Control variables included attitude to physical activity and perceived barriers to physical activity. RESULTS: Fifty-five participants were allocated to each group; 152 completed the study and were included in the analysis: n = 49, no feedback; n = 53, individual feedback; n = 50, individual and social feedback. The study provided support for H1 and H3 but not H2. Receipt of either form of feedback explained 7.7 % of between-subject variability in step-count (F = 6.626, p < 0.0005). Compared to the control, the expected step-count for the individual feedback group was 60 % higher (effect on log step-count = 0.474, 95 % CI = 0.166–0.782) and that for the social feedback group, 69 % higher (effect on log step-count = 0.526, 95 % CI = 0.212–0.840). The difference between the two feedback groups (individual vs social feedback) was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Always-on smartphone apps that provide step-counts can increase physical activity in young to early-middle-aged men but the provision of social feedback has no apparent incremental impact. This approach may be particularly suitable for inactive people with low levels of physical activity; it should now be tested with this population. BioMed Central 2016-09-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5010703/ /pubmed/27590255 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3593-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Harries, Tim
Eslambolchilar, Parisa
Rettie, Ruth
Stride, Chris
Walton, Simon
van Woerden, Hugo C.
Effectiveness of a smartphone app in increasing physical activity amongst male adults: a randomised controlled trial
title Effectiveness of a smartphone app in increasing physical activity amongst male adults: a randomised controlled trial
title_full Effectiveness of a smartphone app in increasing physical activity amongst male adults: a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Effectiveness of a smartphone app in increasing physical activity amongst male adults: a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of a smartphone app in increasing physical activity amongst male adults: a randomised controlled trial
title_short Effectiveness of a smartphone app in increasing physical activity amongst male adults: a randomised controlled trial
title_sort effectiveness of a smartphone app in increasing physical activity amongst male adults: a randomised controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5010703/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27590255
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3593-9
work_keys_str_mv AT harriestim effectivenessofasmartphoneappinincreasingphysicalactivityamongstmaleadultsarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT eslambolchilarparisa effectivenessofasmartphoneappinincreasingphysicalactivityamongstmaleadultsarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT rettieruth effectivenessofasmartphoneappinincreasingphysicalactivityamongstmaleadultsarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT stridechris effectivenessofasmartphoneappinincreasingphysicalactivityamongstmaleadultsarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT waltonsimon effectivenessofasmartphoneappinincreasingphysicalactivityamongstmaleadultsarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT vanwoerdenhugoc effectivenessofasmartphoneappinincreasingphysicalactivityamongstmaleadultsarandomisedcontrolledtrial