Cargando…

Comparison of a Modern and Fossil Pithovirus Reveals Its Genetic Conservation and Evolution

Most theories on viral evolution are speculative and lack fossil comparison. Here, we isolated a modern Pithovirus-like virus from sewage samples. This giant virus, named Pithovirus massiliensis, was compared with its prehistoric counterpart, Pithovirus sibericum, found in Siberian permafrost. Our a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Levasseur, Anthony, Andreani, Julien, Delerce, Jeremy, Bou Khalil, Jacques, Robert, Catherine, La Scola, Bernard, Raoult, Didier
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5010891/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27389688
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evw153
_version_ 1782451748329226240
author Levasseur, Anthony
Andreani, Julien
Delerce, Jeremy
Bou Khalil, Jacques
Robert, Catherine
La Scola, Bernard
Raoult, Didier
author_facet Levasseur, Anthony
Andreani, Julien
Delerce, Jeremy
Bou Khalil, Jacques
Robert, Catherine
La Scola, Bernard
Raoult, Didier
author_sort Levasseur, Anthony
collection PubMed
description Most theories on viral evolution are speculative and lack fossil comparison. Here, we isolated a modern Pithovirus-like virus from sewage samples. This giant virus, named Pithovirus massiliensis, was compared with its prehistoric counterpart, Pithovirus sibericum, found in Siberian permafrost. Our analysis revealed near-complete gene repertoire conservation, including horizontal gene transfer and ORFans. Furthermore, all orthologous genes evolved under strong purifying selection with a non-synonymous and synonymous ratio in the same range as the ratio found in the prokaryotic world. The comparison between fossil and modern Pithovirus species provided an estimation of the cadence of the molecular clock, reaching up to 3 × 10(−6) mutations/site/year. In addition, the strict conservation of HGTs and ORFans in P. massiliensis revealed the stable genetic mosaicism in giant viruses and excludes the concept of a bag of genes. The genetic stability for 30,000 years of P. massiliensis demonstrates that giant viruses evolve similarly to prokaryotes by classical mechanisms of evolution, including selection and fixation of genes, followed by selective constraints.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5010891
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50108912016-09-06 Comparison of a Modern and Fossil Pithovirus Reveals Its Genetic Conservation and Evolution Levasseur, Anthony Andreani, Julien Delerce, Jeremy Bou Khalil, Jacques Robert, Catherine La Scola, Bernard Raoult, Didier Genome Biol Evol Research Article Most theories on viral evolution are speculative and lack fossil comparison. Here, we isolated a modern Pithovirus-like virus from sewage samples. This giant virus, named Pithovirus massiliensis, was compared with its prehistoric counterpart, Pithovirus sibericum, found in Siberian permafrost. Our analysis revealed near-complete gene repertoire conservation, including horizontal gene transfer and ORFans. Furthermore, all orthologous genes evolved under strong purifying selection with a non-synonymous and synonymous ratio in the same range as the ratio found in the prokaryotic world. The comparison between fossil and modern Pithovirus species provided an estimation of the cadence of the molecular clock, reaching up to 3 × 10(−6) mutations/site/year. In addition, the strict conservation of HGTs and ORFans in P. massiliensis revealed the stable genetic mosaicism in giant viruses and excludes the concept of a bag of genes. The genetic stability for 30,000 years of P. massiliensis demonstrates that giant viruses evolve similarly to prokaryotes by classical mechanisms of evolution, including selection and fixation of genes, followed by selective constraints. Oxford University Press 2016-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5010891/ /pubmed/27389688 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evw153 Text en © The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Research Article
Levasseur, Anthony
Andreani, Julien
Delerce, Jeremy
Bou Khalil, Jacques
Robert, Catherine
La Scola, Bernard
Raoult, Didier
Comparison of a Modern and Fossil Pithovirus Reveals Its Genetic Conservation and Evolution
title Comparison of a Modern and Fossil Pithovirus Reveals Its Genetic Conservation and Evolution
title_full Comparison of a Modern and Fossil Pithovirus Reveals Its Genetic Conservation and Evolution
title_fullStr Comparison of a Modern and Fossil Pithovirus Reveals Its Genetic Conservation and Evolution
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of a Modern and Fossil Pithovirus Reveals Its Genetic Conservation and Evolution
title_short Comparison of a Modern and Fossil Pithovirus Reveals Its Genetic Conservation and Evolution
title_sort comparison of a modern and fossil pithovirus reveals its genetic conservation and evolution
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5010891/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27389688
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evw153
work_keys_str_mv AT levasseuranthony comparisonofamodernandfossilpithovirusrevealsitsgeneticconservationandevolution
AT andreanijulien comparisonofamodernandfossilpithovirusrevealsitsgeneticconservationandevolution
AT delercejeremy comparisonofamodernandfossilpithovirusrevealsitsgeneticconservationandevolution
AT boukhaliljacques comparisonofamodernandfossilpithovirusrevealsitsgeneticconservationandevolution
AT robertcatherine comparisonofamodernandfossilpithovirusrevealsitsgeneticconservationandevolution
AT lascolabernard comparisonofamodernandfossilpithovirusrevealsitsgeneticconservationandevolution
AT raoultdidier comparisonofamodernandfossilpithovirusrevealsitsgeneticconservationandevolution