Cargando…

Evaluation of different fermentation processes for use by small cocoa growers in mexico

The aim of this research was to evaluate four different cacao (Theobroma cacao L.) fermentation conditions and their effect on fermented bean quality, in order to be able to recommend the most suitable condition to producers in the municipality of Huimanguillo, Tabasco, Mexico. Fermentations were ca...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hernández‐ Hernández, C., López‐Andrade, Procopio Alejandro, Ramírez‐Guillermo, Miguel A., Guerra Ramírez, Diana, Caballero Pérez, Juan F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5011376/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27625772
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.333
_version_ 1782451817840377856
author Hernández‐ Hernández, C.
López‐Andrade, Procopio Alejandro
Ramírez‐Guillermo, Miguel A.
Guerra Ramírez, Diana
Caballero Pérez, Juan F.
author_facet Hernández‐ Hernández, C.
López‐Andrade, Procopio Alejandro
Ramírez‐Guillermo, Miguel A.
Guerra Ramírez, Diana
Caballero Pérez, Juan F.
author_sort Hernández‐ Hernández, C.
collection PubMed
description The aim of this research was to evaluate four different cacao (Theobroma cacao L.) fermentation conditions and their effect on fermented bean quality, in order to be able to recommend the most suitable condition to producers in the municipality of Huimanguillo, Tabasco, Mexico. Fermentations were carried out in square wooden boxes with capacity for 1000, 300, and 100 kg of fresh beans, as well as a rotary drum with capacity for 500 kg thereof. The fermentation process was carried out for 7 days, and the response variables measured were mass temperature, total soluble solids (TSS), pH, and acidity. The TSS were totally depleted after 2 days, during which time the yeasts transformed them into ethanol at temperatures of 25–35°C. The most notable temperature increase in the four treatments was 49°C on the third day, corresponding to a decrease in pH from 6.31 ± 0.40 to 4.76 ± 0.03 and an increase in acidity from 0.38 ± 0.04 to 1.17 ± 0.25 g kg(−1), due to the formation of organic acids. There were no significant differences among the four treatments (Tukey α = 0.05). The cut test showed that fermentation in 300‐ and 100‐kg boxes and in the 500‐kg rotary drum produced the same effect on fermentation quality, but the 1000‐kg boxes exhibited lower quality (Tukey α = 0.05).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5011376
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50113762016-09-13 Evaluation of different fermentation processes for use by small cocoa growers in mexico Hernández‐ Hernández, C. López‐Andrade, Procopio Alejandro Ramírez‐Guillermo, Miguel A. Guerra Ramírez, Diana Caballero Pérez, Juan F. Food Sci Nutr Original Research The aim of this research was to evaluate four different cacao (Theobroma cacao L.) fermentation conditions and their effect on fermented bean quality, in order to be able to recommend the most suitable condition to producers in the municipality of Huimanguillo, Tabasco, Mexico. Fermentations were carried out in square wooden boxes with capacity for 1000, 300, and 100 kg of fresh beans, as well as a rotary drum with capacity for 500 kg thereof. The fermentation process was carried out for 7 days, and the response variables measured were mass temperature, total soluble solids (TSS), pH, and acidity. The TSS were totally depleted after 2 days, during which time the yeasts transformed them into ethanol at temperatures of 25–35°C. The most notable temperature increase in the four treatments was 49°C on the third day, corresponding to a decrease in pH from 6.31 ± 0.40 to 4.76 ± 0.03 and an increase in acidity from 0.38 ± 0.04 to 1.17 ± 0.25 g kg(−1), due to the formation of organic acids. There were no significant differences among the four treatments (Tukey α = 0.05). The cut test showed that fermentation in 300‐ and 100‐kg boxes and in the 500‐kg rotary drum produced the same effect on fermentation quality, but the 1000‐kg boxes exhibited lower quality (Tukey α = 0.05). John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-01-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5011376/ /pubmed/27625772 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.333 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Food Science & Nutrition published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Hernández‐ Hernández, C.
López‐Andrade, Procopio Alejandro
Ramírez‐Guillermo, Miguel A.
Guerra Ramírez, Diana
Caballero Pérez, Juan F.
Evaluation of different fermentation processes for use by small cocoa growers in mexico
title Evaluation of different fermentation processes for use by small cocoa growers in mexico
title_full Evaluation of different fermentation processes for use by small cocoa growers in mexico
title_fullStr Evaluation of different fermentation processes for use by small cocoa growers in mexico
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of different fermentation processes for use by small cocoa growers in mexico
title_short Evaluation of different fermentation processes for use by small cocoa growers in mexico
title_sort evaluation of different fermentation processes for use by small cocoa growers in mexico
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5011376/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27625772
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.333
work_keys_str_mv AT hernandezhernandezc evaluationofdifferentfermentationprocessesforusebysmallcocoagrowersinmexico
AT lopezandradeprocopioalejandro evaluationofdifferentfermentationprocessesforusebysmallcocoagrowersinmexico
AT ramirezguillermomiguela evaluationofdifferentfermentationprocessesforusebysmallcocoagrowersinmexico
AT guerraramirezdiana evaluationofdifferentfermentationprocessesforusebysmallcocoagrowersinmexico
AT caballeroperezjuanf evaluationofdifferentfermentationprocessesforusebysmallcocoagrowersinmexico