Cargando…

Comparison of joint kinematics and pedaling force in the young and the elderly

[Purpose] Proper pedaling posture can improve muscle strength and cardiopulmonary function. To investigate proper pedaling posture for the elderly, this study compared the pedaling efficiency of the elderly with that of the young by using an index of effectiveness (IE) and kinematic results. [Subjec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Seo, Jeong-Woo, Kim, Dae-Hyeok, Yang, Seung-Tae, Kang, Dong-Won, Choi, Jin-Seung, Tack, Gye-Rae
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Society of Physical Therapy Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5011570/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27630406
http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.28.2245
_version_ 1782451851274223616
author Seo, Jeong-Woo
Kim, Dae-Hyeok
Yang, Seung-Tae
Kang, Dong-Won
Choi, Jin-Seung
Tack, Gye-Rae
author_facet Seo, Jeong-Woo
Kim, Dae-Hyeok
Yang, Seung-Tae
Kang, Dong-Won
Choi, Jin-Seung
Tack, Gye-Rae
author_sort Seo, Jeong-Woo
collection PubMed
description [Purpose] Proper pedaling posture can improve muscle strength and cardiopulmonary function. To investigate proper pedaling posture for the elderly, this study compared the pedaling efficiency of the elderly with that of the young by using an index of effectiveness (IE) and kinematic results. [Subjects and Methods] Eight adults in their twenties and eight in their seventies participated in 3-min, 40 rpm cycle pedaling tests, with the same load and cadence. The joint angle, range of motion (ROM), and IE were compared by measuring 3-dimensional motion and 3-axis pedal-reaction force during 4 pedaling phases (Phase 1: 330–30°, Phase 2: 30–150°, Phase 3: 150–210°, and Phase 4: 210–330°). [Results] The knee and ankle ROM, maximum knee extension, and maximum ankle dorsiflexion in the elderly were significantly decreased compared with those in the young. Moreover, there were significant differences in IE for the total phase, Phase 1, and Phase 4 between the elderly and young. IE of the young was greater than that of the elderly, except in Phase 3. [Conclusion] Joint movement in the elderly during pedaling was limited. This study provides information that will facilitate the proposal of an efficient pedaling method for the elderly.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5011570
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher The Society of Physical Therapy Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50115702016-09-14 Comparison of joint kinematics and pedaling force in the young and the elderly Seo, Jeong-Woo Kim, Dae-Hyeok Yang, Seung-Tae Kang, Dong-Won Choi, Jin-Seung Tack, Gye-Rae J Phys Ther Sci Original Article [Purpose] Proper pedaling posture can improve muscle strength and cardiopulmonary function. To investigate proper pedaling posture for the elderly, this study compared the pedaling efficiency of the elderly with that of the young by using an index of effectiveness (IE) and kinematic results. [Subjects and Methods] Eight adults in their twenties and eight in their seventies participated in 3-min, 40 rpm cycle pedaling tests, with the same load and cadence. The joint angle, range of motion (ROM), and IE were compared by measuring 3-dimensional motion and 3-axis pedal-reaction force during 4 pedaling phases (Phase 1: 330–30°, Phase 2: 30–150°, Phase 3: 150–210°, and Phase 4: 210–330°). [Results] The knee and ankle ROM, maximum knee extension, and maximum ankle dorsiflexion in the elderly were significantly decreased compared with those in the young. Moreover, there were significant differences in IE for the total phase, Phase 1, and Phase 4 between the elderly and young. IE of the young was greater than that of the elderly, except in Phase 3. [Conclusion] Joint movement in the elderly during pedaling was limited. This study provides information that will facilitate the proposal of an efficient pedaling method for the elderly. The Society of Physical Therapy Science 2016-08-31 2016-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5011570/ /pubmed/27630406 http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.28.2245 Text en 2016©by the Society of Physical Therapy Science. Published by IPEC Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd) License.
spellingShingle Original Article
Seo, Jeong-Woo
Kim, Dae-Hyeok
Yang, Seung-Tae
Kang, Dong-Won
Choi, Jin-Seung
Tack, Gye-Rae
Comparison of joint kinematics and pedaling force in the young and the elderly
title Comparison of joint kinematics and pedaling force in the young and the elderly
title_full Comparison of joint kinematics and pedaling force in the young and the elderly
title_fullStr Comparison of joint kinematics and pedaling force in the young and the elderly
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of joint kinematics and pedaling force in the young and the elderly
title_short Comparison of joint kinematics and pedaling force in the young and the elderly
title_sort comparison of joint kinematics and pedaling force in the young and the elderly
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5011570/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27630406
http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.28.2245
work_keys_str_mv AT seojeongwoo comparisonofjointkinematicsandpedalingforceintheyoungandtheelderly
AT kimdaehyeok comparisonofjointkinematicsandpedalingforceintheyoungandtheelderly
AT yangseungtae comparisonofjointkinematicsandpedalingforceintheyoungandtheelderly
AT kangdongwon comparisonofjointkinematicsandpedalingforceintheyoungandtheelderly
AT choijinseung comparisonofjointkinematicsandpedalingforceintheyoungandtheelderly
AT tackgyerae comparisonofjointkinematicsandpedalingforceintheyoungandtheelderly