Cargando…
Experiences of general practitioners, home care nurses, physiotherapists and seniors involved in a multidisciplinary home-based fall prevention programme: a mixed method study
BACKGROUND: The feasibility of effective fall prevention programmes (FPPs) for use in daily clinical practice needs to be assessed in the specific healthcare settings. The aim of this study was to explore the perceived benefits and barriers of an evidence-based, home-based pilot FPP among the involv...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5011799/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27595748 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1719-5 |
_version_ | 1782451896144887808 |
---|---|
author | Amacher, Astrid E. Nast, Irina Zindel, Barbara Schmid, Lukas Krafft, Valérie Niedermann, Karin |
author_facet | Amacher, Astrid E. Nast, Irina Zindel, Barbara Schmid, Lukas Krafft, Valérie Niedermann, Karin |
author_sort | Amacher, Astrid E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The feasibility of effective fall prevention programmes (FPPs) for use in daily clinical practice needs to be assessed in the specific healthcare settings. The aim of this study was to explore the perceived benefits and barriers of an evidence-based, home-based pilot FPP among the involved seniors, general practitioners (GPs), home care nurses (HCNs) and physiotherapists (PTs), in order to develop tailored implementation strategies. METHODS: The study was a mixed method study using an ‘exploratory sequential design’. In the initial qualitative sequence, semi-structured interviews were performed with four participants from each group and analysed using a deductive content analysis. In the successive quantitative sequence, target group specific postal surveys were conducted with all participants. The triangulation of both steps allowed merging the in-depth experiences from the interviews with the general findings from the survey. RESULTS: In this evaluation study participated 17 seniors (mean age 79.7 (SD +/-6.2) years). 40 GPs, 12 HCNs and four PTs. All were satisfied with the organization and processes of the FPP. The main benefit, perceived by each target group, was the usefulness of the FPP in detecting risk of falling at the senior’s home. A low number of recruiting GPs and HCNs, divergent opinions of the health professionals towards the aim of the FPP as well as no perceived need for changes by the seniors were the most important barriers to the participation of (more) seniors. CONCLUSIONS: Multidisciplinary home-based fall prevention is a useful approach to detect the risk of falling in seniors. The barriers identified need to be resolved through tailored strategies to facilitate the successful nationwide implementation of this pilot FPP. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-016-1719-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5011799 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50117992016-09-07 Experiences of general practitioners, home care nurses, physiotherapists and seniors involved in a multidisciplinary home-based fall prevention programme: a mixed method study Amacher, Astrid E. Nast, Irina Zindel, Barbara Schmid, Lukas Krafft, Valérie Niedermann, Karin BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: The feasibility of effective fall prevention programmes (FPPs) for use in daily clinical practice needs to be assessed in the specific healthcare settings. The aim of this study was to explore the perceived benefits and barriers of an evidence-based, home-based pilot FPP among the involved seniors, general practitioners (GPs), home care nurses (HCNs) and physiotherapists (PTs), in order to develop tailored implementation strategies. METHODS: The study was a mixed method study using an ‘exploratory sequential design’. In the initial qualitative sequence, semi-structured interviews were performed with four participants from each group and analysed using a deductive content analysis. In the successive quantitative sequence, target group specific postal surveys were conducted with all participants. The triangulation of both steps allowed merging the in-depth experiences from the interviews with the general findings from the survey. RESULTS: In this evaluation study participated 17 seniors (mean age 79.7 (SD +/-6.2) years). 40 GPs, 12 HCNs and four PTs. All were satisfied with the organization and processes of the FPP. The main benefit, perceived by each target group, was the usefulness of the FPP in detecting risk of falling at the senior’s home. A low number of recruiting GPs and HCNs, divergent opinions of the health professionals towards the aim of the FPP as well as no perceived need for changes by the seniors were the most important barriers to the participation of (more) seniors. CONCLUSIONS: Multidisciplinary home-based fall prevention is a useful approach to detect the risk of falling in seniors. The barriers identified need to be resolved through tailored strategies to facilitate the successful nationwide implementation of this pilot FPP. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-016-1719-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-09-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5011799/ /pubmed/27595748 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1719-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Amacher, Astrid E. Nast, Irina Zindel, Barbara Schmid, Lukas Krafft, Valérie Niedermann, Karin Experiences of general practitioners, home care nurses, physiotherapists and seniors involved in a multidisciplinary home-based fall prevention programme: a mixed method study |
title | Experiences of general practitioners, home care nurses, physiotherapists and seniors involved in a multidisciplinary home-based fall prevention programme: a mixed method study |
title_full | Experiences of general practitioners, home care nurses, physiotherapists and seniors involved in a multidisciplinary home-based fall prevention programme: a mixed method study |
title_fullStr | Experiences of general practitioners, home care nurses, physiotherapists and seniors involved in a multidisciplinary home-based fall prevention programme: a mixed method study |
title_full_unstemmed | Experiences of general practitioners, home care nurses, physiotherapists and seniors involved in a multidisciplinary home-based fall prevention programme: a mixed method study |
title_short | Experiences of general practitioners, home care nurses, physiotherapists and seniors involved in a multidisciplinary home-based fall prevention programme: a mixed method study |
title_sort | experiences of general practitioners, home care nurses, physiotherapists and seniors involved in a multidisciplinary home-based fall prevention programme: a mixed method study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5011799/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27595748 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1719-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT amacherastride experiencesofgeneralpractitionershomecarenursesphysiotherapistsandseniorsinvolvedinamultidisciplinaryhomebasedfallpreventionprogrammeamixedmethodstudy AT nastirina experiencesofgeneralpractitionershomecarenursesphysiotherapistsandseniorsinvolvedinamultidisciplinaryhomebasedfallpreventionprogrammeamixedmethodstudy AT zindelbarbara experiencesofgeneralpractitionershomecarenursesphysiotherapistsandseniorsinvolvedinamultidisciplinaryhomebasedfallpreventionprogrammeamixedmethodstudy AT schmidlukas experiencesofgeneralpractitionershomecarenursesphysiotherapistsandseniorsinvolvedinamultidisciplinaryhomebasedfallpreventionprogrammeamixedmethodstudy AT krafftvalerie experiencesofgeneralpractitionershomecarenursesphysiotherapistsandseniorsinvolvedinamultidisciplinaryhomebasedfallpreventionprogrammeamixedmethodstudy AT niedermannkarin experiencesofgeneralpractitionershomecarenursesphysiotherapistsandseniorsinvolvedinamultidisciplinaryhomebasedfallpreventionprogrammeamixedmethodstudy |