Cargando…
Health status instruments for patients with COPD in pulmonary rehabilitation: defining a minimal clinically important difference
The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) defines to what extent change on a health status instrument is clinically relevant, which aids scientists and physicians in measuring therapy effects. This is the first study that aimed to establish the MCID of the Clinical chronic obstructive pulmo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5011855/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27597571 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/npjpcrm.2016.41 |
_version_ | 1782451906808905728 |
---|---|
author | Alma, Harma de Jong, Corina Jelusic, Danijel Wittmann, Michael Schuler, Michael Blok, Bertine Flokstra-de Kocks, Janwillem Schultz, Konrad Molen, Thys van der |
author_facet | Alma, Harma de Jong, Corina Jelusic, Danijel Wittmann, Michael Schuler, Michael Blok, Bertine Flokstra-de Kocks, Janwillem Schultz, Konrad Molen, Thys van der |
author_sort | Alma, Harma |
collection | PubMed |
description | The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) defines to what extent change on a health status instrument is clinically relevant, which aids scientists and physicians in measuring therapy effects. This is the first study that aimed to establish the MCID of the Clinical chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) Questionnaire (CCQ), the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) and the St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) in the same pulmonary rehabilitation population using multiple approaches. In total, 451 COPD patients participated in a 3-week Pulmonary Rehabilitation (PR) programme (58 years, 65% male, 43 pack-years, GOLD stage II/III/IV 50/39/11%). Techniques used to assess the MCID were anchor-based approaches, including patient-referencing, criterion-referencing and questionnaire-referencing, and the distribution-based methods standard error of measurement (SEM), 1.96SEM and half standard deviation (0.5s.d.). Patient- and criterion-referencing led to MCID estimates of 0.56 and 0.62 (CCQ); 3.12 and 2.96 (CAT); and 8.40 and 9.28 (SGRQ). Questionnaire-referencing suggested MCID ranges of 0.28–0.61 (CCQ), 1.46–3.08 (CAT) and 6.86–9.47 (SGRQ). The SEM, 1.96SEM and 0.5s.d. were 0.29, 0.56 and 0.46 (CCQ); 3.28, 6.43 and 2.80 (CAT); 5.20, 10.19 and 6.06 (SGRQ). Pooled estimates were 0.52 (CCQ), 3.29 (CAT) and 7.91 (SGRQ) for improvement. MCID estimates differed depending on the method used. Pooled estimates suggest clinically relevant improvements needing to exceed 0.40 on the CCQ, 3.00 on the CAT and 7.00 on the SGRQ for moderate to very severe COPD patients. The MCIDs of the CAT and SGRQ in the literature might be too low, leading to overestimation of treatment effects for patients with COPD. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5011855 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50118552016-09-15 Health status instruments for patients with COPD in pulmonary rehabilitation: defining a minimal clinically important difference Alma, Harma de Jong, Corina Jelusic, Danijel Wittmann, Michael Schuler, Michael Blok, Bertine Flokstra-de Kocks, Janwillem Schultz, Konrad Molen, Thys van der NPJ Prim Care Respir Med Article The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) defines to what extent change on a health status instrument is clinically relevant, which aids scientists and physicians in measuring therapy effects. This is the first study that aimed to establish the MCID of the Clinical chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) Questionnaire (CCQ), the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) and the St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) in the same pulmonary rehabilitation population using multiple approaches. In total, 451 COPD patients participated in a 3-week Pulmonary Rehabilitation (PR) programme (58 years, 65% male, 43 pack-years, GOLD stage II/III/IV 50/39/11%). Techniques used to assess the MCID were anchor-based approaches, including patient-referencing, criterion-referencing and questionnaire-referencing, and the distribution-based methods standard error of measurement (SEM), 1.96SEM and half standard deviation (0.5s.d.). Patient- and criterion-referencing led to MCID estimates of 0.56 and 0.62 (CCQ); 3.12 and 2.96 (CAT); and 8.40 and 9.28 (SGRQ). Questionnaire-referencing suggested MCID ranges of 0.28–0.61 (CCQ), 1.46–3.08 (CAT) and 6.86–9.47 (SGRQ). The SEM, 1.96SEM and 0.5s.d. were 0.29, 0.56 and 0.46 (CCQ); 3.28, 6.43 and 2.80 (CAT); 5.20, 10.19 and 6.06 (SGRQ). Pooled estimates were 0.52 (CCQ), 3.29 (CAT) and 7.91 (SGRQ) for improvement. MCID estimates differed depending on the method used. Pooled estimates suggest clinically relevant improvements needing to exceed 0.40 on the CCQ, 3.00 on the CAT and 7.00 on the SGRQ for moderate to very severe COPD patients. The MCIDs of the CAT and SGRQ in the literature might be too low, leading to overestimation of treatment effects for patients with COPD. Nature Publishing Group 2016-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5011855/ /pubmed/27597571 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/npjpcrm.2016.41 Text en Copyright © 2016 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Alma, Harma de Jong, Corina Jelusic, Danijel Wittmann, Michael Schuler, Michael Blok, Bertine Flokstra-de Kocks, Janwillem Schultz, Konrad Molen, Thys van der Health status instruments for patients with COPD in pulmonary rehabilitation: defining a minimal clinically important difference |
title | Health status instruments for patients with COPD in pulmonary rehabilitation: defining a minimal clinically important difference |
title_full | Health status instruments for patients with COPD in pulmonary rehabilitation: defining a minimal clinically important difference |
title_fullStr | Health status instruments for patients with COPD in pulmonary rehabilitation: defining a minimal clinically important difference |
title_full_unstemmed | Health status instruments for patients with COPD in pulmonary rehabilitation: defining a minimal clinically important difference |
title_short | Health status instruments for patients with COPD in pulmonary rehabilitation: defining a minimal clinically important difference |
title_sort | health status instruments for patients with copd in pulmonary rehabilitation: defining a minimal clinically important difference |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5011855/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27597571 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/npjpcrm.2016.41 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT almaharma healthstatusinstrumentsforpatientswithcopdinpulmonaryrehabilitationdefiningaminimalclinicallyimportantdifference AT dejongcorina healthstatusinstrumentsforpatientswithcopdinpulmonaryrehabilitationdefiningaminimalclinicallyimportantdifference AT jelusicdanijel healthstatusinstrumentsforpatientswithcopdinpulmonaryrehabilitationdefiningaminimalclinicallyimportantdifference AT wittmannmichael healthstatusinstrumentsforpatientswithcopdinpulmonaryrehabilitationdefiningaminimalclinicallyimportantdifference AT schulermichael healthstatusinstrumentsforpatientswithcopdinpulmonaryrehabilitationdefiningaminimalclinicallyimportantdifference AT blokbertineflokstrade healthstatusinstrumentsforpatientswithcopdinpulmonaryrehabilitationdefiningaminimalclinicallyimportantdifference AT kocksjanwillem healthstatusinstrumentsforpatientswithcopdinpulmonaryrehabilitationdefiningaminimalclinicallyimportantdifference AT schultzkonrad healthstatusinstrumentsforpatientswithcopdinpulmonaryrehabilitationdefiningaminimalclinicallyimportantdifference AT molenthysvander healthstatusinstrumentsforpatientswithcopdinpulmonaryrehabilitationdefiningaminimalclinicallyimportantdifference |