Cargando…

Health status instruments for patients with COPD in pulmonary rehabilitation: defining a minimal clinically important difference

The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) defines to what extent change on a health status instrument is clinically relevant, which aids scientists and physicians in measuring therapy effects. This is the first study that aimed to establish the MCID of the Clinical chronic obstructive pulmo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alma, Harma, de Jong, Corina, Jelusic, Danijel, Wittmann, Michael, Schuler, Michael, Blok, Bertine Flokstra-de, Kocks, Janwillem, Schultz, Konrad, Molen, Thys van der
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5011855/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27597571
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/npjpcrm.2016.41
_version_ 1782451906808905728
author Alma, Harma
de Jong, Corina
Jelusic, Danijel
Wittmann, Michael
Schuler, Michael
Blok, Bertine Flokstra-de
Kocks, Janwillem
Schultz, Konrad
Molen, Thys van der
author_facet Alma, Harma
de Jong, Corina
Jelusic, Danijel
Wittmann, Michael
Schuler, Michael
Blok, Bertine Flokstra-de
Kocks, Janwillem
Schultz, Konrad
Molen, Thys van der
author_sort Alma, Harma
collection PubMed
description The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) defines to what extent change on a health status instrument is clinically relevant, which aids scientists and physicians in measuring therapy effects. This is the first study that aimed to establish the MCID of the Clinical chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) Questionnaire (CCQ), the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) and the St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) in the same pulmonary rehabilitation population using multiple approaches. In total, 451 COPD patients participated in a 3-week Pulmonary Rehabilitation (PR) programme (58 years, 65% male, 43 pack-years, GOLD stage II/III/IV 50/39/11%). Techniques used to assess the MCID were anchor-based approaches, including patient-referencing, criterion-referencing and questionnaire-referencing, and the distribution-based methods standard error of measurement (SEM), 1.96SEM and half standard deviation (0.5s.d.). Patient- and criterion-referencing led to MCID estimates of 0.56 and 0.62 (CCQ); 3.12 and 2.96 (CAT); and 8.40 and 9.28 (SGRQ). Questionnaire-referencing suggested MCID ranges of 0.28–0.61 (CCQ), 1.46–3.08 (CAT) and 6.86–9.47 (SGRQ). The SEM, 1.96SEM and 0.5s.d. were 0.29, 0.56 and 0.46 (CCQ); 3.28, 6.43 and 2.80 (CAT); 5.20, 10.19 and 6.06 (SGRQ). Pooled estimates were 0.52 (CCQ), 3.29 (CAT) and 7.91 (SGRQ) for improvement. MCID estimates differed depending on the method used. Pooled estimates suggest clinically relevant improvements needing to exceed 0.40 on the CCQ, 3.00 on the CAT and 7.00 on the SGRQ for moderate to very severe COPD patients. The MCIDs of the CAT and SGRQ in the literature might be too low, leading to overestimation of treatment effects for patients with COPD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5011855
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50118552016-09-15 Health status instruments for patients with COPD in pulmonary rehabilitation: defining a minimal clinically important difference Alma, Harma de Jong, Corina Jelusic, Danijel Wittmann, Michael Schuler, Michael Blok, Bertine Flokstra-de Kocks, Janwillem Schultz, Konrad Molen, Thys van der NPJ Prim Care Respir Med Article The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) defines to what extent change on a health status instrument is clinically relevant, which aids scientists and physicians in measuring therapy effects. This is the first study that aimed to establish the MCID of the Clinical chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) Questionnaire (CCQ), the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) and the St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) in the same pulmonary rehabilitation population using multiple approaches. In total, 451 COPD patients participated in a 3-week Pulmonary Rehabilitation (PR) programme (58 years, 65% male, 43 pack-years, GOLD stage II/III/IV 50/39/11%). Techniques used to assess the MCID were anchor-based approaches, including patient-referencing, criterion-referencing and questionnaire-referencing, and the distribution-based methods standard error of measurement (SEM), 1.96SEM and half standard deviation (0.5s.d.). Patient- and criterion-referencing led to MCID estimates of 0.56 and 0.62 (CCQ); 3.12 and 2.96 (CAT); and 8.40 and 9.28 (SGRQ). Questionnaire-referencing suggested MCID ranges of 0.28–0.61 (CCQ), 1.46–3.08 (CAT) and 6.86–9.47 (SGRQ). The SEM, 1.96SEM and 0.5s.d. were 0.29, 0.56 and 0.46 (CCQ); 3.28, 6.43 and 2.80 (CAT); 5.20, 10.19 and 6.06 (SGRQ). Pooled estimates were 0.52 (CCQ), 3.29 (CAT) and 7.91 (SGRQ) for improvement. MCID estimates differed depending on the method used. Pooled estimates suggest clinically relevant improvements needing to exceed 0.40 on the CCQ, 3.00 on the CAT and 7.00 on the SGRQ for moderate to very severe COPD patients. The MCIDs of the CAT and SGRQ in the literature might be too low, leading to overestimation of treatment effects for patients with COPD. Nature Publishing Group 2016-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5011855/ /pubmed/27597571 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/npjpcrm.2016.41 Text en Copyright © 2016 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Alma, Harma
de Jong, Corina
Jelusic, Danijel
Wittmann, Michael
Schuler, Michael
Blok, Bertine Flokstra-de
Kocks, Janwillem
Schultz, Konrad
Molen, Thys van der
Health status instruments for patients with COPD in pulmonary rehabilitation: defining a minimal clinically important difference
title Health status instruments for patients with COPD in pulmonary rehabilitation: defining a minimal clinically important difference
title_full Health status instruments for patients with COPD in pulmonary rehabilitation: defining a minimal clinically important difference
title_fullStr Health status instruments for patients with COPD in pulmonary rehabilitation: defining a minimal clinically important difference
title_full_unstemmed Health status instruments for patients with COPD in pulmonary rehabilitation: defining a minimal clinically important difference
title_short Health status instruments for patients with COPD in pulmonary rehabilitation: defining a minimal clinically important difference
title_sort health status instruments for patients with copd in pulmonary rehabilitation: defining a minimal clinically important difference
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5011855/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27597571
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/npjpcrm.2016.41
work_keys_str_mv AT almaharma healthstatusinstrumentsforpatientswithcopdinpulmonaryrehabilitationdefiningaminimalclinicallyimportantdifference
AT dejongcorina healthstatusinstrumentsforpatientswithcopdinpulmonaryrehabilitationdefiningaminimalclinicallyimportantdifference
AT jelusicdanijel healthstatusinstrumentsforpatientswithcopdinpulmonaryrehabilitationdefiningaminimalclinicallyimportantdifference
AT wittmannmichael healthstatusinstrumentsforpatientswithcopdinpulmonaryrehabilitationdefiningaminimalclinicallyimportantdifference
AT schulermichael healthstatusinstrumentsforpatientswithcopdinpulmonaryrehabilitationdefiningaminimalclinicallyimportantdifference
AT blokbertineflokstrade healthstatusinstrumentsforpatientswithcopdinpulmonaryrehabilitationdefiningaminimalclinicallyimportantdifference
AT kocksjanwillem healthstatusinstrumentsforpatientswithcopdinpulmonaryrehabilitationdefiningaminimalclinicallyimportantdifference
AT schultzkonrad healthstatusinstrumentsforpatientswithcopdinpulmonaryrehabilitationdefiningaminimalclinicallyimportantdifference
AT molenthysvander healthstatusinstrumentsforpatientswithcopdinpulmonaryrehabilitationdefiningaminimalclinicallyimportantdifference