Cargando…

Relational interventions in psychotherapy: development of a therapy process rating scale

BACKGROUND: In psychodynamic psychotherapy, one of the therapists’ techniques is to intervene on and encourage exploration of the patients’ relationships with other people. The impact of these interventions and the response from the patient are probably dependent on certain characteristics of the co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ulberg, Randi, Ness, Elisabeth, Dahl, Hanne-Sofie Johnsen, Høglend, Per Andreas, Critchfield, Kenneth, Blayvas, Phelix, Amlo, Svein
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5011870/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27600314
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-016-1021-4
_version_ 1782451910268157952
author Ulberg, Randi
Ness, Elisabeth
Dahl, Hanne-Sofie Johnsen
Høglend, Per Andreas
Critchfield, Kenneth
Blayvas, Phelix
Amlo, Svein
author_facet Ulberg, Randi
Ness, Elisabeth
Dahl, Hanne-Sofie Johnsen
Høglend, Per Andreas
Critchfield, Kenneth
Blayvas, Phelix
Amlo, Svein
author_sort Ulberg, Randi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In psychodynamic psychotherapy, one of the therapists’ techniques is to intervene on and encourage exploration of the patients’ relationships with other people. The impact of these interventions and the response from the patient are probably dependent on certain characteristics of the context in which the interventions are given and the interventions themselves. To identify and analyze in-session effects of therapists’ techniques, process scales are used. The aim of the present study was to develop a simple, not resource consuming rating tool for in-session process to be used when therapists’ interventions focus on the patients’ relationships outside therapy. METHODS: The present study describes the development and use of a therapy process rating scale, the Relational Work Scale (RWS). The scale was constructed to identify, categorize and explore therapist interventions that focus on the patient’s relationships to family, friends, and colleges Relational Interventions and explore the impact on the in-session process. RWS was developed with sub scales rating timing, content, and valence of the relational interventions, as well as response from the patient. For the inter-rater reliability analyzes, transcribed segments (10 min) from 20 different patients were scored with RWS by two independent raters. Two clinical vignettes of relational work are included in the paper as examples of how to rate transcripts from therapy sessions with RWS. RESULTS: The inter-rater agreement on the RWS items was good to excellent. CONCLUSION: Relational Work Scale might be a potentially useful tool to identify relational interventions as well as explore the interaction of timing, category, and valence of relational work in psychotherapies. The therapist’s interventions on the patient’s relationships with people outside therapy and the following patient-therapist interaction might be explored. TRIAL REGISTRATION: First Experimental Study of Transference-interpretations (FEST307/95) Registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00423462. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12888-016-1021-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5011870
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50118702016-09-07 Relational interventions in psychotherapy: development of a therapy process rating scale Ulberg, Randi Ness, Elisabeth Dahl, Hanne-Sofie Johnsen Høglend, Per Andreas Critchfield, Kenneth Blayvas, Phelix Amlo, Svein BMC Psychiatry Technical Advance BACKGROUND: In psychodynamic psychotherapy, one of the therapists’ techniques is to intervene on and encourage exploration of the patients’ relationships with other people. The impact of these interventions and the response from the patient are probably dependent on certain characteristics of the context in which the interventions are given and the interventions themselves. To identify and analyze in-session effects of therapists’ techniques, process scales are used. The aim of the present study was to develop a simple, not resource consuming rating tool for in-session process to be used when therapists’ interventions focus on the patients’ relationships outside therapy. METHODS: The present study describes the development and use of a therapy process rating scale, the Relational Work Scale (RWS). The scale was constructed to identify, categorize and explore therapist interventions that focus on the patient’s relationships to family, friends, and colleges Relational Interventions and explore the impact on the in-session process. RWS was developed with sub scales rating timing, content, and valence of the relational interventions, as well as response from the patient. For the inter-rater reliability analyzes, transcribed segments (10 min) from 20 different patients were scored with RWS by two independent raters. Two clinical vignettes of relational work are included in the paper as examples of how to rate transcripts from therapy sessions with RWS. RESULTS: The inter-rater agreement on the RWS items was good to excellent. CONCLUSION: Relational Work Scale might be a potentially useful tool to identify relational interventions as well as explore the interaction of timing, category, and valence of relational work in psychotherapies. The therapist’s interventions on the patient’s relationships with people outside therapy and the following patient-therapist interaction might be explored. TRIAL REGISTRATION: First Experimental Study of Transference-interpretations (FEST307/95) Registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00423462. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12888-016-1021-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5011870/ /pubmed/27600314 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-016-1021-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Technical Advance
Ulberg, Randi
Ness, Elisabeth
Dahl, Hanne-Sofie Johnsen
Høglend, Per Andreas
Critchfield, Kenneth
Blayvas, Phelix
Amlo, Svein
Relational interventions in psychotherapy: development of a therapy process rating scale
title Relational interventions in psychotherapy: development of a therapy process rating scale
title_full Relational interventions in psychotherapy: development of a therapy process rating scale
title_fullStr Relational interventions in psychotherapy: development of a therapy process rating scale
title_full_unstemmed Relational interventions in psychotherapy: development of a therapy process rating scale
title_short Relational interventions in psychotherapy: development of a therapy process rating scale
title_sort relational interventions in psychotherapy: development of a therapy process rating scale
topic Technical Advance
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5011870/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27600314
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-016-1021-4
work_keys_str_mv AT ulbergrandi relationalinterventionsinpsychotherapydevelopmentofatherapyprocessratingscale
AT nesselisabeth relationalinterventionsinpsychotherapydevelopmentofatherapyprocessratingscale
AT dahlhannesofiejohnsen relationalinterventionsinpsychotherapydevelopmentofatherapyprocessratingscale
AT høglendperandreas relationalinterventionsinpsychotherapydevelopmentofatherapyprocessratingscale
AT critchfieldkenneth relationalinterventionsinpsychotherapydevelopmentofatherapyprocessratingscale
AT blayvasphelix relationalinterventionsinpsychotherapydevelopmentofatherapyprocessratingscale
AT amlosvein relationalinterventionsinpsychotherapydevelopmentofatherapyprocessratingscale