Cargando…

Practice facilitation for improving cardiovascular care: secondary evaluation of a stepped wedge cluster randomized controlled trial using population-based administrative data

BACKGROUND: Practice facilitation (PF), a multifaceted approach in which facilitators (external health care professionals) help family physicians to improve their adoption of best practices, has been highly successful. Improved Delivery of Cardiovascular Care (IDOCC) was an innovative PF trial desig...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Deri Armstrong, Catherine, Taljaard, Monica, Hogg, William, Mark, Amy E., Liddy, Clare
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5011906/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27596224
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1547-2
_version_ 1782451917929054208
author Deri Armstrong, Catherine
Taljaard, Monica
Hogg, William
Mark, Amy E.
Liddy, Clare
author_facet Deri Armstrong, Catherine
Taljaard, Monica
Hogg, William
Mark, Amy E.
Liddy, Clare
author_sort Deri Armstrong, Catherine
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Practice facilitation (PF), a multifaceted approach in which facilitators (external health care professionals) help family physicians to improve their adoption of best practices, has been highly successful. Improved Delivery of Cardiovascular Care (IDOCC) was an innovative PF trial designed to improve evidence-based care for people who have, or are at risk of, cardiovascular disease (CVD). The intervention was found to be ineffective as assessed by a patient-level composite score based on chart reviews from a subsample of patients (N = 5292). Here, we used population-based administrative data to examine IDOCC’s effect on CVD-related hospitalizations. METHODS: IDOCC used a pragmatic, stepped wedge cluster randomized controlled design involving primary care providers recruited across Eastern Ontario, Canada. IDOCC’s effect on CVD-related hospitalizations was assessed in the 2 years of active intervention and post-intervention years. Marginal and mixed-effects regression analyses were used to account for the study design and to control for patient, physician, and practice characteristics. Secondary and subgroup analyses investigated robustness. RESULTS: Our sample included 262,996 patient/year observations representing 54,085 unique patients who had, or were at risk of, CVD, from 70 practices. There was a strong decreasing secular trend in CVD-related hospitalizations but no statistically significant effect of IDOCC. Relative to patients in the control condition, patients in the intervention condition were estimated to have 4 % lower odds of CVD-related hospitalizations (adjOR = 0.96, 99 % CI 0.83 to 1.11). The nonsignificant result persisted across robustness analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical outcomes from administrative databases were examined to form a more complete picture of the (in)effectiveness of a large-scale quality improvement intervention. IDOCC did not have a significant effect on CVD hospitalizations, suggesting that the results from the primary composite adherence score analysis were neither due to choice of outcome nor relatively short follow-up period. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00574808, registered on 14 December 2007. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-016-1547-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5011906
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50119062016-09-07 Practice facilitation for improving cardiovascular care: secondary evaluation of a stepped wedge cluster randomized controlled trial using population-based administrative data Deri Armstrong, Catherine Taljaard, Monica Hogg, William Mark, Amy E. Liddy, Clare Trials Research BACKGROUND: Practice facilitation (PF), a multifaceted approach in which facilitators (external health care professionals) help family physicians to improve their adoption of best practices, has been highly successful. Improved Delivery of Cardiovascular Care (IDOCC) was an innovative PF trial designed to improve evidence-based care for people who have, or are at risk of, cardiovascular disease (CVD). The intervention was found to be ineffective as assessed by a patient-level composite score based on chart reviews from a subsample of patients (N = 5292). Here, we used population-based administrative data to examine IDOCC’s effect on CVD-related hospitalizations. METHODS: IDOCC used a pragmatic, stepped wedge cluster randomized controlled design involving primary care providers recruited across Eastern Ontario, Canada. IDOCC’s effect on CVD-related hospitalizations was assessed in the 2 years of active intervention and post-intervention years. Marginal and mixed-effects regression analyses were used to account for the study design and to control for patient, physician, and practice characteristics. Secondary and subgroup analyses investigated robustness. RESULTS: Our sample included 262,996 patient/year observations representing 54,085 unique patients who had, or were at risk of, CVD, from 70 practices. There was a strong decreasing secular trend in CVD-related hospitalizations but no statistically significant effect of IDOCC. Relative to patients in the control condition, patients in the intervention condition were estimated to have 4 % lower odds of CVD-related hospitalizations (adjOR = 0.96, 99 % CI 0.83 to 1.11). The nonsignificant result persisted across robustness analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical outcomes from administrative databases were examined to form a more complete picture of the (in)effectiveness of a large-scale quality improvement intervention. IDOCC did not have a significant effect on CVD hospitalizations, suggesting that the results from the primary composite adherence score analysis were neither due to choice of outcome nor relatively short follow-up period. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00574808, registered on 14 December 2007. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-016-1547-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-09-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5011906/ /pubmed/27596224 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1547-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Deri Armstrong, Catherine
Taljaard, Monica
Hogg, William
Mark, Amy E.
Liddy, Clare
Practice facilitation for improving cardiovascular care: secondary evaluation of a stepped wedge cluster randomized controlled trial using population-based administrative data
title Practice facilitation for improving cardiovascular care: secondary evaluation of a stepped wedge cluster randomized controlled trial using population-based administrative data
title_full Practice facilitation for improving cardiovascular care: secondary evaluation of a stepped wedge cluster randomized controlled trial using population-based administrative data
title_fullStr Practice facilitation for improving cardiovascular care: secondary evaluation of a stepped wedge cluster randomized controlled trial using population-based administrative data
title_full_unstemmed Practice facilitation for improving cardiovascular care: secondary evaluation of a stepped wedge cluster randomized controlled trial using population-based administrative data
title_short Practice facilitation for improving cardiovascular care: secondary evaluation of a stepped wedge cluster randomized controlled trial using population-based administrative data
title_sort practice facilitation for improving cardiovascular care: secondary evaluation of a stepped wedge cluster randomized controlled trial using population-based administrative data
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5011906/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27596224
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1547-2
work_keys_str_mv AT deriarmstrongcatherine practicefacilitationforimprovingcardiovascularcaresecondaryevaluationofasteppedwedgeclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrialusingpopulationbasedadministrativedata
AT taljaardmonica practicefacilitationforimprovingcardiovascularcaresecondaryevaluationofasteppedwedgeclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrialusingpopulationbasedadministrativedata
AT hoggwilliam practicefacilitationforimprovingcardiovascularcaresecondaryevaluationofasteppedwedgeclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrialusingpopulationbasedadministrativedata
AT markamye practicefacilitationforimprovingcardiovascularcaresecondaryevaluationofasteppedwedgeclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrialusingpopulationbasedadministrativedata
AT liddyclare practicefacilitationforimprovingcardiovascularcaresecondaryevaluationofasteppedwedgeclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrialusingpopulationbasedadministrativedata