Cargando…
Can surveys of women accurately track indicators of maternal and newborn care? A validity and reliability study in Kenya
BACKGROUND: Tracking progress on maternal and newborn survival requires accurate information on the coverage of essential interventions. Despite widespread use, most indicators measuring maternal and newborn intervention coverage have not been validated. This study assessed the ability of women deli...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Edinburgh University Global Health Society
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5012235/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27606061 http://dx.doi.org/10.7189/jogh.06.020502 |
_version_ | 1782451969673134080 |
---|---|
author | McCarthy, Katharine J Blanc, Ann K Warren, Charlotte E Kimani, James Mdawida, Brian Ndwidga, Charity |
author_facet | McCarthy, Katharine J Blanc, Ann K Warren, Charlotte E Kimani, James Mdawida, Brian Ndwidga, Charity |
author_sort | McCarthy, Katharine J |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Tracking progress on maternal and newborn survival requires accurate information on the coverage of essential interventions. Despite widespread use, most indicators measuring maternal and newborn intervention coverage have not been validated. This study assessed the ability of women delivering in two Kenyan hospitals to recall critical elements of care received during the intrapartum and immediate postnatal period at two time points: hospital discharge and 13–15 months following delivery. METHODS: Women’s reports of received care were compared against observations by trained third party observers. Indicators selected for validation were either currently in use or have the potential to be included in population–based surveys. We used a mixed–methods approach to validate women’s reporting ability. We calculated individual–reporting accuracy using the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC), population–level accuracy using the inflation factor (IF), and compared the accuracy of women’s reporting at baseline and follow–up. We also assessed the consistency of women’s reporting over time. We used in–depth interviews with a sub–set of women (n = 20) to assess their understanding of key survey terms. RESULTS: Of 606 women who participated at baseline and agreed to follow–up, 515 were re–interviewed. Thirty–eight indicators had sufficient sample size for validation analysis; ten met criteria for high or moderate reporting accuracy (0.60<AUC) alone and ten met criteria for low population–level bias alone (0.75<IF<1.25). There was a significant decline in the individual level reporting accuracy between baseline and follow–up for ten indicators. Seven indicators had moderate or higher (0.4≤r(phi)) consistency between self–reports at baseline and follow–up. Four indicators met all criteria at follow–up: support person was present during the birth, episiotomy, caesarean section, and low birthweight infant (<2500 g). CONCLUSION: The few indicators that women reported accurately at baseline were consistently recalled with accuracy at 13–15 months follow–up. Although there is deterioration in women’s recall in some indicators over time, the extent of deterioration does not appreciably compromise reporting accuracy for indicators with high baseline validity. Indicators related to initial client assessment and the immediate postnatal period have generally low accuracy and poor reporting consistency over time. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5012235 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Edinburgh University Global Health Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50122352016-09-07 Can surveys of women accurately track indicators of maternal and newborn care? A validity and reliability study in Kenya McCarthy, Katharine J Blanc, Ann K Warren, Charlotte E Kimani, James Mdawida, Brian Ndwidga, Charity J Glob Health Research Theme: Improving coverage measures for MNCH BACKGROUND: Tracking progress on maternal and newborn survival requires accurate information on the coverage of essential interventions. Despite widespread use, most indicators measuring maternal and newborn intervention coverage have not been validated. This study assessed the ability of women delivering in two Kenyan hospitals to recall critical elements of care received during the intrapartum and immediate postnatal period at two time points: hospital discharge and 13–15 months following delivery. METHODS: Women’s reports of received care were compared against observations by trained third party observers. Indicators selected for validation were either currently in use or have the potential to be included in population–based surveys. We used a mixed–methods approach to validate women’s reporting ability. We calculated individual–reporting accuracy using the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC), population–level accuracy using the inflation factor (IF), and compared the accuracy of women’s reporting at baseline and follow–up. We also assessed the consistency of women’s reporting over time. We used in–depth interviews with a sub–set of women (n = 20) to assess their understanding of key survey terms. RESULTS: Of 606 women who participated at baseline and agreed to follow–up, 515 were re–interviewed. Thirty–eight indicators had sufficient sample size for validation analysis; ten met criteria for high or moderate reporting accuracy (0.60<AUC) alone and ten met criteria for low population–level bias alone (0.75<IF<1.25). There was a significant decline in the individual level reporting accuracy between baseline and follow–up for ten indicators. Seven indicators had moderate or higher (0.4≤r(phi)) consistency between self–reports at baseline and follow–up. Four indicators met all criteria at follow–up: support person was present during the birth, episiotomy, caesarean section, and low birthweight infant (<2500 g). CONCLUSION: The few indicators that women reported accurately at baseline were consistently recalled with accuracy at 13–15 months follow–up. Although there is deterioration in women’s recall in some indicators over time, the extent of deterioration does not appreciably compromise reporting accuracy for indicators with high baseline validity. Indicators related to initial client assessment and the immediate postnatal period have generally low accuracy and poor reporting consistency over time. Edinburgh University Global Health Society 2016-12 2016-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5012235/ /pubmed/27606061 http://dx.doi.org/10.7189/jogh.06.020502 Text en Copyright © 2016 by the Journal of Global Health. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Theme: Improving coverage measures for MNCH McCarthy, Katharine J Blanc, Ann K Warren, Charlotte E Kimani, James Mdawida, Brian Ndwidga, Charity Can surveys of women accurately track indicators of maternal and newborn care? A validity and reliability study in Kenya |
title | Can surveys of women accurately track indicators of maternal and newborn care? A validity and reliability study in Kenya |
title_full | Can surveys of women accurately track indicators of maternal and newborn care? A validity and reliability study in Kenya |
title_fullStr | Can surveys of women accurately track indicators of maternal and newborn care? A validity and reliability study in Kenya |
title_full_unstemmed | Can surveys of women accurately track indicators of maternal and newborn care? A validity and reliability study in Kenya |
title_short | Can surveys of women accurately track indicators of maternal and newborn care? A validity and reliability study in Kenya |
title_sort | can surveys of women accurately track indicators of maternal and newborn care? a validity and reliability study in kenya |
topic | Research Theme: Improving coverage measures for MNCH |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5012235/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27606061 http://dx.doi.org/10.7189/jogh.06.020502 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mccarthykatharinej cansurveysofwomenaccuratelytrackindicatorsofmaternalandnewborncareavalidityandreliabilitystudyinkenya AT blancannk cansurveysofwomenaccuratelytrackindicatorsofmaternalandnewborncareavalidityandreliabilitystudyinkenya AT warrencharlottee cansurveysofwomenaccuratelytrackindicatorsofmaternalandnewborncareavalidityandreliabilitystudyinkenya AT kimanijames cansurveysofwomenaccuratelytrackindicatorsofmaternalandnewborncareavalidityandreliabilitystudyinkenya AT mdawidabrian cansurveysofwomenaccuratelytrackindicatorsofmaternalandnewborncareavalidityandreliabilitystudyinkenya AT ndwidgacharity cansurveysofwomenaccuratelytrackindicatorsofmaternalandnewborncareavalidityandreliabilitystudyinkenya |